Pioneer CDJ-350 user reviews ( 7/10) - 4 user reviews

• 01/14/12

  Dj azzano's review ( translated ) Improve this translation " good product"

  Overall Opinion

  I use it for 10 months.
  
  it is a good product easy to use, with good quality / price ratio.
  
  For cons I do not rekorbox, just to prepare playlists
  
  I put it on usb.
  
  I think I would do the same choice as for the right budget is good
  
  equipment.
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 12/27/11

  alex2305's review ( translated ) Improve this translation " super nice!"

  Overall Opinion

  I use it for 8 months, I ride with 2 cdj 350 and djm 350 1.
  
  This is my first cdj I used a small USB controller before and I wanted to take a heavier lol!
  
  This is an entry level course at Pioneer but I would say to start mixing is great, it has all of great ;-).
  
  The coolest feature is the USB connection (I would say indispensable to the digital age), the BPM lock (always useful from time to time), Loop and Beat Loop Divide.
  
  The pioneer gear is always a little but I Exess remake that choice without hesitation.
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 07/20/11

  FeeL-31's review ( translated ) Improve this translation " Not bad but not a "bomb""

  Overall Opinion

  I started mixing in 1987 and really mix the tempo and sequence in 1988 at the time acid house and techno with Technics MK2, I officiated pro for over ten years, only in nightclubs , bars, pubs, or techno parties
  
  
  
  I finally launched this year on CD (although I no longer "pro" now, just mix with me or friends), I chose to automatically Technics and I wanted something new, given the exorbitant price and scandalous large models of the brand I chose the 350
  
  
  
  the transition to "plateau" has cost a few hours to understand all the subtleties but ultimately it is a technology that I find the point
  
  
  
  I use no CD but with songs stored on USB flash drive 64 go, we gain precious time to mix the pieces below, is the thing that really amazed!
  
  they have no effect but it does not bother me since I assignable effects on my DJM 400, I used quite a few anyway
  
  
  
  by then the tempo issue against it thickens, it was not the time to add a decimal to BPM because they are not accurate enough to enjoy it, there are even times where I made long mixes with a BPM difference between the two pieces being yet totally in tune "by ear" unacceptable when one uses a decimal BPM!
  
  
  
  that's why the score will be lowered because really the rest is almost all good (except the inflated price knowing the margin applied ...)
  
  
  
  PS: I use them for 5 months
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 10/17/10

  DUDUDJ's review ( translated ) Improve this translation " Finally a simple platinum"

  Overall Opinion

  I was looking for turntables simple, sober and effective and not fawn tuning since they like to do now besides the 400 had no escapes this rule (I started the profession as it Twenty years ago on the famous MK2 may be just the rejection of my gadgets quickly tiresome term for that matter). Everything works perfectly. No more, no less, she has what it takes o properly.
  
  As I said above, simple, clean and efficient ... I saw a young DJ working LATEST equipped with a hardware copy but has rotted his evening programming pollutant effects indigestible and constant repetitive Why? Just because this young dj has not the key bases of the animation. Dj young, I address you, start by learning sound tempo, Entran you make cuts audible voice, the number of buttons on a deck is not a guarantee of success, by a cons good programming is the cl of Russianness a good evening. The cdj 350 you will due to its simplicity, believe me ...
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno

• Page: 1