Behringer Tweakalizer DFX69 user reviews ( 6/10) - 5 user reviews

• 08/30/09

  hugo54's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Characteristics

  We will not go back on it, already a topic again and again ...
  
  I wish, however, a notch filter and an adjustable Q for the filter.

  Utilization

  The use poses no problem, everything is simple and seems fairly obvious, the manual, as always with Behr, is very clear and user friendly.
  
  The buttons to vary the LFO are not very big, but one gets used to it.

  Sound Quality

  Well, that's where I'll be longer, I will combine sound quality and overall quality of this box.
  
  
  
  First, since it is new, the gain spit, no big deal we do not use it very often, but ...
  
  
  
  The effects are fun ... voila! There's something for his money, and I'll never party with (quoique. ..) but my room is perfect for fun!
  
  
  
  The scratch as the sampler are gadgets, but to tweak, not bad. The low-cut filter is not bad I think, but the band pass and low pass are much worse I think.
  
  
  
  The delay is classic, but I find the flanger quite successful, with sounds that I like, and not found elsewhere (in my opinion!).
  
  
  
  Do not abuse course on music, but plugged into a synthesizer, I think he is doing very well, and even used to the extreme, the resulting sound is of course completely distorted, but still usable.
  
  
  
  At the finish, that's where it coince.Le jog to look right, and pretty solid, but the plastic shell is thinner than my bottle of crystal clear, as are the knobs that inspire me that medium confidence ...
  
  
  
  on the other hand after a year and a half "normal" use, I began to have some bugs, the camera blocking ...
  
  I take it apart and ... ouch ... hot glued to the radiator integrated circuits ... not so terrible ... he suffered overheating.
  
  Today, the problem is solved, the upper is enhanced with spacers, and the circuit is separated from the radiator by a metal plate, leaving a vent on the side.
  
  
  
  In short, fun effects, but not really terrible finish ...

  Overall Opinion

  I will not reopen the debate Behringer, but I must admit that at my age (16 years) I have nothing to complain about.
  
  
  
  This product, I paid 100 euros ... what to expect? I have made repairs that do not cost me, and it works again ... effects than enough for fun, and can even be used (low dose anyway!) in the evening.
  
  
  
  For those who spit on our beloved Bérangère, I want to tell them if you do not please do not buy! But I use many products and no equals their brand value ... and remember that their products have forced the more expensive brands to lower their tariffs ;-) (I digress a bit I think!)
  
  
  
  In conclusion, I have never regretted this purchase, it will last as long as it lasts, but for now, I'm having with, and most importantly I think ;-)
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 01/09/08

  djblackbay's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Characteristics

  As effects, there is delay (not bad), an adjustable filter (though good) and an adjustable flanger (not bad)
  
  
  
  A sampler of 16 sec (????) is inside but it's not too rglo on beats, so watch out!

  Utilization

  It's hard enough to take over at beginners, but APRS rolls ...
  
  
  
  The manual is very well and is in French xD

  Sound Quality

  The effects are generally not bad, but lack a bit of finesse and quality.
  
  Caution, do not bleach product of 1500 W! pk has a little crochote!

  Overall Opinion

  I use it for 6 months. I think it's good for beginners and Madl small budjets. it is a bit kitsch but it is effective and is trs pro with his Lumire tt! I still use it now with a alesis NanoVerb, c perfect.
  
  
  
  What I blame him 100% c plastoc the quality, even the buttons or the chrome starts from ... Without power supply, the bte does (that) 300 grams ...
  
  
  
  However good for beginners and petis budjets
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 12/13/07

  Anonymous 's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Characteristics

  What prompted your purchase?
  
  The price! I had 90euros, then at 105 Woodbrass.
  
  
  
  What are the effects available?
  
  A good quality of a flanger delay acceptable, an adjustable filter but a little galre rgler, all with adjustable intensity (hardly the very first time ^ ^)
  
  The scratch is heart. it looks like noise tuft of wind in the trees, but trees full of plastic bags!
  
  a tri-band equalizer little use in my case, but with prcis kills (I plug it between my table and my numark prampli)
  
  
  
  What are the connections?
  
  2 IN RCA (phono and line a comuttable line), 1 RCA OUT
  
  Which is positive: the flanger
  
  the scratch (solo and attention ears!)
  
  2 x RCA IN
  
  Price
  
  the sampler (but the beats are too prcis)
  
  what is ngatif: the delay and filter
  
  scratch, can
  
  pitch and tense enough prcis (+ / - 12)
  
  no output to record (any fawn seen the quality of his ...)

  Utilization

  It's pretty easy to use, but it takes a little getting used to (three days at most)
  
  
  
  the effect is rglage pnible.
  
  the sampler is very simple but you must understand!

  Sound Quality

  Warning!
  
  prs if you put a PC, the sound will DCON! the housing gaffe from heat, then! must also use shielded cables, gold plated preferences avoid a violent blow.
  
  the sound of the sampler is a little and not enough dgueulasse prcis

  Overall Opinion

  It's a toy.
  
  A toy for beginners that require little. but then. if you do not want or can sell it, scratch with, make flanger, it is the only interest.
  
  
  
  when used for 3 months, we better understand the price
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 09/23/06

  clemdahouseclub's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Characteristics

  - What are the effects or types of effects available?
  
  A Flanger (auto or manual), filter (auto or manual and LFO), delay (auto or manual), scratch, equalizer (high, med, and low cut on each), pitch + / -12%, dry / wet on all effects, sampler 1,2,4,8,16 time to play and shot rew.
  
  
  
  - What technology is used? (Analog, numrique, lamp ...)
  
  Numrique probably, but not certain.
  
  
  
  - Are they ditables? Via an editor Mac / PC?
  
  Oh no!
  
  
  
  - What is the connection? (Audio / MIDI)
  
  RCA phono / line RCA input and output.
  
  
  
  - Is this a rack or rack MODEL?
  
  No rack

  Utilization

  - The configuration gnrale Is it easy?
  
  We will say yes to someone normally constituted. APRS is not very simple either.
  
  
  
  - The edition of sounds and effects is it easy?
  
  Carrment unless the scratch is complicated and unnecessary.
  
  
  
  - The manual is clear and sufficient?
  
  Trs (too?) It is 50 pages, you have it in 35 languages ​​(!) (6 pages in French)

  Sound Quality

  - Effects are they effective, suitable and adequate ralistes?
  
  Effective adpend of what you ask. Let's say a password, nothing more. All effects are samples (thankfully!), The filter is too strong (too much Dcibel, must be taken lightly ...) the delay is not much except with a lightweight intrt retad that can make a mini echo.
  
  
  
  - Which instruments do you use?
  
  With two Gemini ICDJ, a Gemini SL1210 mkII and ICFX.
  
  
  
  - What are those you prfrez, you dtest?
  
  I mainly use the flanger and filter, just like the sampler, but it must be so definitely the estpas trs gaffe for something clean.

  Overall Opinion

  - How long have you use it?
  
  About 6 months.
  
  
  
  - What is the particular feature you like best and least?
  
  
  
  Minimum: Any plastic toy ... not pro as usual 'what. Not super strong I have a dj buttonTwo rglage of chantillonage who makes his own ...
  
  Between one line (I have no send / return on my table so it's before the amp)
  
  
  
  The best: the price, the effects remain even when the quality is good for beginners fussy in the effect.
  
  
  
  - Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
  
  Some, if not a DJM500 bote effect that I found very difficult.
  
  
  
  - How do you report qualitprix?
  
  Ah bah plutt good, all for 100 Fawn not expect the pro gear, and more Behringer ...
  
  - With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
  
  I beginners in the world of mix is ​​a nice product for small portfolios and since I'm not an addict has the effect for me.
  
  APRS is true that if I had put a few dollars more, I took one or EFX500 Kaos.
  
  Overall Rating: 6 because even when it is good for those who dbutent. Aficionados of arms mix of Pioneer, Denon and Technics, go your way and go kick the real stuff!
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 08/11/06

  Dj Ass's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Characteristics

  Three more filters effect

  Utilization

  Very simple even if it byzarre it is used at the beginning

  Sound Quality

  Indeed very decent for the price but it's still room for use

  Overall Opinion

  1 year of use, disappointed at first but it's still a good machine, price quality ratio ... Normal, Berhinger could not have afford to faitre more expensive!
  
  loop is disappointing but in direct line between the table and the amp is Dtonn! the delay is too limited but the atmosphere is. Do not connect 1kw failing to explode the ears of clubbers, the quality of sound is not ... Damage, the evolution of this machine is the best esperont
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno