Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Sennheiser e 606
Images
1/168

All user reviews for the Sennheiser e 606

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
5.0/5
(7 reviews)
86 %
(6 reviews)
Write a user review
Users reviews
  • pulvoniumpulvonium

    Sennheiser e 606Published on 02/06/13 at 05:06
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    See data sheet

    OVERALL OPINION

    Utlise from 6-7 years for repirse guitar amps.
    I bought very cramped for scenes where I was tired of me taking foot in SM17 ... Purists will scream, but it allowed me to gain a little space on stage and save the transportation of a mic stand!
    Excellent sound.
    Reliable over time.
    It would take me a second ...
  • wolfdavwolfdav

    the E606

    Sennheiser e 606Published on 01/21/13 at 11:57
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Supercardioid dynamic microphone "flat profile" developed specifically for guitar amps. Optimized presence in the midrange. Offering easy installation thanks to the proximity of the capsule. Construction shock. Very high sound pressure without distortion.

    OVERALL OPINION

    4 years.
    it is very easy to implement and very good quality / price ratio.
  • tibo67tibo67

    Sennheiser e 606Published on 04/04/07 at 08:13
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    This model of microphone is designed to take the sound out of the cabinet (guitar).
    To better see the characteristics of Senn's site directly.

    OVERALL OPINION

    First advantage can let dangle in front of the baffle.Le sound is good in this way as I board the aussi.Bien not had much time to try it I board could compare to the Senn SM57.Ce more (for a record muscular) is that it is more "dynamic" on the big big sound with rhythm and notes dropped on the rope against grave.Par in palm muting I could not find it very different from the sm57 (can be a lack of time to try other settings).
    Even with sounds very modified with effects son.Jusqu it takes well to now there is the sm57 hap…
    Read more
    This model of microphone is designed to take the sound out of the cabinet (guitar).
    To better see the characteristics of Senn's site directly.

    OVERALL OPINION

    First advantage can let dangle in front of the baffle.Le sound is good in this way as I board the aussi.Bien not had much time to try it I board could compare to the Senn SM57.Ce more (for a record muscular) is that it is more "dynamic" on the big big sound with rhythm and notes dropped on the rope against grave.Par in palm muting I could not find it very different from the sm57 (can be a lack of time to try other settings).
    Even with sounds very modified with effects son.Jusqu it takes well to now there is the sm57 happened to take some of my effects. (I searched the board not expensive microphones having said that)
    Compared to the Shure is quite similar even if it is (some areas) slightly more dynamic, better still I try trouve.Le recess.
    I will definitely choose this one for my group already has sm57 and they are almost the same price.
    See less
  • KimoKimo

    Sennheiser e 606Published on 12/04/07 at 10:14
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Microphone for guitar amp (for saturation), but also for brass.
    Dynamic microphone.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I just worth the buy. Just trying to be said that I won plutt.
    In fact I had one with my SM57 disto plutt shrill and cold. So I wanted an alternative. In fact, the sound of this mic is pretty dull (very seventies, eighties ...) with beautiful high mdium without dchirer ear. I noticed that for clean sounds, the microphone tends to clear the plutt dark. So for clean sounds I'll stay on the SM57.
    I coupled my Joemeek Six Q and I have a warm distortion plutt! Arrrgghhh by now. In addition it is small and lightweight!
    I find the report of this gear qualitprix trs satisfactory. I…
    Read more
    Microphone for guitar amp (for saturation), but also for brass.
    Dynamic microphone.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I just worth the buy. Just trying to be said that I won plutt.
    In fact I had one with my SM57 disto plutt shrill and cold. So I wanted an alternative. In fact, the sound of this mic is pretty dull (very seventies, eighties ...) with beautiful high mdium without dchirer ear. I noticed that for clean sounds, the microphone tends to clear the plutt dark. So for clean sounds I'll stay on the SM57.
    I coupled my Joemeek Six Q and I have a warm distortion plutt! Arrrgghhh by now. In addition it is small and lightweight!
    I find the report of this gear qualitprix trs satisfactory. I was afraid to be the.
    So if you want a microphone that you dlivre nice saturation (adpend your gear as well as you!;)) Must not hsiter. I think my sound is close enough group Sevendust (in all modesty, eh!) With the microphone.

    Good advice is one hot. J'mette will have a cold all of the same opinion.

    Tchuss the zicos.
    See less
  • mitchmitch

    Sennheiser e 606Published on 10/31/08 at 02:12
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Small micro gnial!

    OVERALL OPINION

    I could try it on a rhythm guitar in his clear, it is trs clean, with good prsence in the mix. I usually back the guitars with an AKG C 414 in the studio but live, I Dangle this little trick. Really good. Prcis more than 57. But the o's for me you recording trumpet and flugelhorn. Extra! I did not touch the q. The sound is rich, soft and prcis. Finally enough of the trumpet solo or section. I put on a floor tom as a both a record and it's still better than even 57, especially at the low. on the other hand, for the snare, not better. Even a little worse. is not to transplant a snare is not n'chappe 57.
    the 606 is great for congas but also proxi…
    Read more
    Small micro gnial!

    OVERALL OPINION

    I could try it on a rhythm guitar in his clear, it is trs clean, with good prsence in the mix. I usually back the guitars with an AKG C 414 in the studio but live, I Dangle this little trick. Really good. Prcis more than 57. But the o's for me you recording trumpet and flugelhorn. Extra! I did not touch the q. The sound is rich, soft and prcis. Finally enough of the trumpet solo or section. I put on a floor tom as a both a record and it's still better than even 57, especially at the low. on the other hand, for the snare, not better. Even a little worse. is not to transplant a snare is not n'chappe 57.
    the 606 is great for congas but also proximity with another micro atmosphere.
    In résumé from the 57, the 606 has much more bass and a little more treble as well. A genus of 57 with loudness. It parat also a bit more natural, less color. in return, it does not heat the mdiums 57 is Sennheiser's what. Prcis.
    Report quality-price! I'll buy another. or even two.
    See less
  • nico_lasnico_las

    Sennheiser e 606Published on 05/31/09 at 14:32
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Micro classical dynamics.

    It is for the sound of an instrument with good sound pressure.
    I also use it in singing and it is thundering.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I use it for a year now. I had an SM57 and then before I fell on this one.

    I use it mainly for transplanting a guitar amp and bass incidentally. It lacks the low fat to all of the same.

    The cot Obviously practice is to hang in front of the amp without asking any question. Stack is placed in front of the CNE and basta, the catch is good!

    Its Difference from a standard sm57 is the directivity. L o can help finish 57 ultra prcise, the e606 is much broader.
    I'll be honnte, I always had trouble with 57. The sound change…
    Read more
    Micro classical dynamics.

    It is for the sound of an instrument with good sound pressure.
    I also use it in singing and it is thundering.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I use it for a year now. I had an SM57 and then before I fell on this one.

    I use it mainly for transplanting a guitar amp and bass incidentally. It lacks the low fat to all of the same.

    The cot Obviously practice is to hang in front of the amp without asking any question. Stack is placed in front of the CNE and basta, the catch is good!

    Its Difference from a standard sm57 is the directivity. L o can help finish 57 ultra prcise, the e606 is much broader.
    I'll be honnte, I always had trouble with 57. The sound changed too depending on the position and I never russi back the essence of my amp. Now I place it between two bowls 30cm and I grahou, the sound of my amp natural version. I always sound synthetic and trs tightened with the SM57. Its directivity of loudspeaker combines remoteness gives me a good rsultat trs.

    I found the e606, a nice little companion that allows me to sing or get my amp.
    Singing, fix on one foot, I find it great. Fidler is great and pushes the feedback (good stuff). I like the cot to the proper square to the mouth. Trs is subjective but I personally feel better with that big square in front of me like that little lollipop sm58 or worse a 57 ....
    On battery, it takes quite a snare but honntement too big and too prescriptive. The drummer is often the form gn: It takes from the front and not on top like 57/58. It must be placed above the lgrement was and who knows if it is unbearable for a drummer to be careful of where he hits.

    REFERENCE good short to me.
    See less
  • barrjobarrjo

    Sennheiser e 606Published on 09/22/09 at 11:59
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I used to mic the sound of a guitar tube amp in the studio
    nothing special to say

    OVERALL OPINION

    it has been 9 months that I use and I have many things to say to those who have difficulty with.
    In his clear, this microphone is very well placed almost glued to my HP, slightly displaced orbits the center, the sound is harmonically rich, well balanced, I have the sound of my amp, and played as part entendudans he n 'There is no worries.
    For its full, it took me 5 months to really understand how to use the studio and have a sound very very good.
    To do this, I had to catch her with all of the positions of the microphone relative to HP, and over the équalo the amp.
    I lowered…
    Read more
    I used to mic the sound of a guitar tube amp in the studio
    nothing special to say

    OVERALL OPINION

    it has been 9 months that I use and I have many things to say to those who have difficulty with.
    In his clear, this microphone is very well placed almost glued to my HP, slightly displaced orbits the center, the sound is harmonically rich, well balanced, I have the sound of my amp, and played as part entendudans he n 'There is no worries.
    For its full, it took me 5 months to really understand how to use the studio and have a sound very very good.
    To do this, I had to catch her with all of the positions of the microphone relative to HP, and over the équalo the amp.
    I lowered my fat distortion, turn to the level of background noise, without losing my distortion on the recording itself, and equalo was adjusted primarily on low and midrange.
    my microphone for studio is located at 5cm from the amplifier, between the center and the edge of the HP, right in the middle, but that's where it changes everything: the microphone is not facing directly to the HP!
    It is about 45 degrees, towards the center of what HP.
    And, I have some beautiful harmonic sound clean, no noise, clear sound, very little about the sound I hear in my room, a big distortion, my frequencies, flawless, it's terrible.
    But why it took me forever to find out the place, this is my first microphone like this, in direct proximity of HP, and it amazes me, I'm very happy, I have MY sound.
    This review is read by all those who have difficulty using it as me at first but now he is really good for the studio, I would buy this with joy, for the price of 100 €, it is very good!
    See less