Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Sennheiser e 855
Images
1/56

All user reviews for the Sennheiser e 855

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
4.7/5
(6 reviews)
67 %
(4 reviews)
33 %
(2 reviews)
Write a user review
Value For Money : Excellent
Users reviews
  • AzimutAzimut

    Sennheiser e 855Published on 11/21/02 at 14:19
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Micro trs versatile singing and making sound amp.
    cartode super directivity, while building the mtal therefore suitable scne.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I use it for two months. TRS is a good product. trs quality good value for money.
  • qwerty26qwerty26

    Sennheiser e 855Published on 12/01/03 at 11:02
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    OK Song,
    sound recording, but I am far from being a pro and I have nothing to compare.
    It works fine, no breath ....

    OVERALL OPINION

    I use it for about 6 months ...
    Qd I bought it I compared to the SM58, it's cheaper and it seems better.

    In our local repeat, Larcen hand more easily than other pickups, but how it is placed is rotten ....

    In my home studio, no worries ... Nickel
  • wijzz :8)wijzz :8)

    Sennheiser e 855Published on 02/16/04 at 12:01
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    At the cost, we felt the less "nasal" the SM58, which we asduit. The votes taken in the studio is clean and burr-free trs. Rpt used in 'in a room of 30-35m2, yes it is relatively sensitive and causes a feedback or sometimes Rumble. O On some SETTING THE gain and four right thing but I find it much more "hot" a Shure.

    OVERALL OPINION

    Super qulitprix report. 1000frs for less than 3 years ago, the German is the quality the touch is soft and enjoyable and weight leaves a transparatre indniable quality manufacturing guarantee of robustness. With the exprience, I repeat 2! Sennheiser or Shure is according gots!
  • Jean-Jacques SardouJean-Jacques Sardou

    Sennheiser e 855Published on 06/26/04 at 22:45
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Excellent technology, superb ergonomics, absolute fidelity ... perfect for the look and sound of Michael Jackson!

    OVERALL OPINION

    Michel Sardou used shamelessly to each of his appearances on television. His is wireless and has a red ribbon is the best effect, it's fitting color with his legion of honor.
    When I sing in the microphone, I have exactly the voice of Sardou in lakes of Connemara, including bagpipes!
    The price / quality ratio is excellent, except that I have the red ribbon of the draw!
  • Lô83Lô83

    Sennheiser e 855Published on 01/12/07 at 05:47
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Dynamic mic that I use exclusively for singing.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I've had four months soon. I did gigs with 5-6. The overall opinion is pretty good. I have long used an sm58 is a bit Drout beginners to spend on this microphone. It was not the same dynamic. The sound is more neutral with the Sennheiser with the shure. there is no such bump in the mdium CHARACTERISTICS sm58, and the treble is more clear.
    I find it quite sensitive to feedback (back strong when I play in a small room! So it's no wonder) and that its output level is "medium". Fawn subjective, I would say it is not rock'n'roll trs o) If you play rock and mtal, I think the sm58 is better. If it's more jazzy see variety…
    Read more
    Dynamic mic that I use exclusively for singing.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I've had four months soon. I did gigs with 5-6. The overall opinion is pretty good. I have long used an sm58 is a bit Drout beginners to spend on this microphone. It was not the same dynamic. The sound is more neutral with the Sennheiser with the shure. there is no such bump in the mdium CHARACTERISTICS sm58, and the treble is more clear.
    I find it quite sensitive to feedback (back strong when I play in a small room! So it's no wonder) and that its output level is "medium". Fawn subjective, I would say it is not rock'n'roll trs o) If you play rock and mtal, I think the sm58 is better. If it's more jazzy see variety, sennheiser seems to me better. It also dpend your tone of voice ... try me before purchase.

    Apart from the remarks I made prcdemment, I still advise the microphone. It took me several RPET and concerts to "tame" but now I'm really happy.

    Buy another microphone before?? Yes, I think the sm58 is happening everywhere and is a must.
    EDIT January 2007

    In the end I am happy with this micro plutt. He has super Aiges, trs lens, probably a little cold for some votes. But it is a matter of taste. For I am against of its robustness ... He gave me four years of loyal service, but now he's dead. The capsule glue whenever j'mets sound of the cost, I rechte else ... we will test the BETA58 to see;)
    See less
  • alcoolsalcools

    Sennheiser e 855Published on 02/19/10 at 02:22
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Super Cardio rising up and high frequencies (18khz if I remember correctly).

    OVERALL OPINION

    Having long used an SM58, I went on this microphone for a sound thinner and less attachment to feedback. The sound is really more fine and precise, almost the sound of a condenser microphone. This "smooth" a lot of voice: It gives precision tuned as the medium a bit "mushy" are mitigated - However the sound is at once not very neutral!

    Many dynamic and also a high output level (the SM58 has to be largely boosted to reach the same level of output).

    This micro grip a bit less feedback than the SM58, but does not solve everything!

    Since I gave my 855 to my bass player who has a voic…
    Read more
    Super Cardio rising up and high frequencies (18khz if I remember correctly).

    OVERALL OPINION

    Having long used an SM58, I went on this microphone for a sound thinner and less attachment to feedback. The sound is really more fine and precise, almost the sound of a condenser microphone. This "smooth" a lot of voice: It gives precision tuned as the medium a bit "mushy" are mitigated - However the sound is at once not very neutral!

    Many dynamic and also a high output level (the SM58 has to be largely boosted to reach the same level of output).

    This micro grip a bit less feedback than the SM58, but does not solve everything!

    Since I gave my 855 to my bass player who has a voice with a bit of this medium and micro naturally corrects this problem.

    I would do the same choice for my bass player because he had too much midrange. For me, I bought an E945 which suits me better (although the E855 was already far better than a SM58 for me). See you soon in the opinion of 945!
    See less