![Marshall 4102 JCM900 Dual Reverb [1990-1999]](https://img.audiofanzine.com/img/product/normal/5/4/5402.jpg?fm=pjpg&w=300&h=218&fit=max&s=7ee2a3bb6ac6f8f39e8857d6a20185ad)
View other reviews for this product:
Berzin
Published on 03/05/06 at 06:05
The 4102 is a combo amp lamps. Its power is given to 100 watts, but I had a Vox AC 30 (33 watts) that sounded as loud. There are relatively few settings and it is regrettable that the qualiseur is common to both channels (a reverb plutt indpendante). It has a choisr pedals to the channel and activate the rverb. There is an output of selector with hp supplmentaires impdance. The weight is consquent (2 x 12) but the grips are comfortable and well latrales useful.
UTILIZATION
To get sound, it's simple, since there is little rglages. Of a good sound ... Lourdes is the passage that board. When the amp is warm, the tle derrire potentiomtres the gondola and ESG handling of them. Moreover, it appears that rverbe is a bit fragile, mine acd.
SOUNDS
The qualiseur is almost ineffective. The sound is clear cry commonplace. There is no deep throbbing bass or treble singing. Waterloo, dull plain ... I used the keyboard amp Laney an era and an old lamp Garen, who killed the Marshall no problem in terms of clean sound. Gain as the name does not indicate (high gain) remains flush with pquerettes. Pluissance enough to finish the deaf, but the hundred watts ads are hidden. In fact, to have good sound (no more), you really play hard trs (and distortion) to properly heat lamps. But overall, the sound is trsdcevant. The only possible use, as noted by another user, is to connect a prampli (a pod?) For one's drinking. The neutrality of the JCM is then a property: it serves as a power amp. The problem of this amp is résumé in three points: knobs ineffective, no bass and no gain. That's a lot for a single right?
OVERALL OPINION
I used the Marchall 4102 for six years (that long ...) Since I'm dfait. Instead, for the same price, I bought a guitar amp. Acqurir before, I had almost nothing tried other, which is why I bought it. We all make mistakes of youth ... The price does not seem excessive for a one hundred watt bulbs, but given the benefits ... The advice I give is a potential buyer walk away and run fast. There is no better elsewhere and more expensive.
UTILIZATION
To get sound, it's simple, since there is little rglages. Of a good sound ... Lourdes is the passage that board. When the amp is warm, the tle derrire potentiomtres the gondola and ESG handling of them. Moreover, it appears that rverbe is a bit fragile, mine acd.
SOUNDS
The qualiseur is almost ineffective. The sound is clear cry commonplace. There is no deep throbbing bass or treble singing. Waterloo, dull plain ... I used the keyboard amp Laney an era and an old lamp Garen, who killed the Marshall no problem in terms of clean sound. Gain as the name does not indicate (high gain) remains flush with pquerettes. Pluissance enough to finish the deaf, but the hundred watts ads are hidden. In fact, to have good sound (no more), you really play hard trs (and distortion) to properly heat lamps. But overall, the sound is trsdcevant. The only possible use, as noted by another user, is to connect a prampli (a pod?) For one's drinking. The neutrality of the JCM is then a property: it serves as a power amp. The problem of this amp is résumé in three points: knobs ineffective, no bass and no gain. That's a lot for a single right?
OVERALL OPINION
I used the Marchall 4102 for six years (that long ...) Since I'm dfait. Instead, for the same price, I bought a guitar amp. Acqurir before, I had almost nothing tried other, which is why I bought it. We all make mistakes of youth ... The price does not seem excessive for a one hundred watt bulbs, but given the benefits ... The advice I give is a potential buyer walk away and run fast. There is no better elsewhere and more expensive.