All user reviews of 4/5 for the Behringer B-2 Pro

Vocal mic large diaphragm condenser

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 11 years now. Initially for lyrical singing and 5 years for the voiceover.

I like different microphones Rode in or Audiotechnica.

Now that it has become my reference microphone for voice-overs, what I like is that it is very linear over the entire spectrum. No grain, no heat provided by a Neumann-type lamp, but with the advantage that we do what we want her master. It is a little less sensitive than eg Rode NT1A, but the voice just what is excellent, because the useful signal is recovered with less noise or mouth breath. A good gate to -50 db mixing and your client receives an audio file without any noise interference.

If I rest solely on the voice application, the value is unbeatable. I for customers the biggest clubs in the world (Nestle, Samsung, Times Warner ...) and all were impressed by the quality of the sound (to cabin voice, of course). When I started this business I thought that if I became rich and famous I'll pay a U87, but with experience, I think for the price differential would be a waste. The U87 will be reserved for the beautiful music.

I paid $200 at an online music store (I think B&H photo) for the mic to do some home studio vocal recording.

For the money, less than Rhodes or AKG's similar models, and way-way less than any Blue mic, it sounds great. It is very transparent and quiet. When I went to the studio I do my mastering at, even the engineer commented on the quality of the vocal recordings.

There is some noticeable sibilance around the "ess" vocal frequency, that is not quite flat. We used a software de-esser to adjust for the problem.

The construction is top notch. Heavy and sturdy casing, also came with a very nice (and hard metal) carring case and windscreen.

For any newbies such as myself, don't blow $800 on a studio condenser when you can record very high quality vocals with this this mic (the B2-Pro) with small amounts of necessary correction.

This review was originally published on http://www.musicgearreview.com

See doc of the manufacturer.

OVERALL OPINION

This is the only condenser microphone that I tried (I have been offered) and I must say that, given the price, it is rather interesting for small "home-studio owners" who, like me, n ' have no means but looking for a micro stretch with a minimum of interest.
Even if the lump desired by Behringer to 12kHz can disturb, it also "clarify" his voice a little (I tend to be severe enough). Not necessarily a fatal flaw in itself, but if you want to leave a voice proper, it must apply to the song and ... the mix!
I have never tried otherwise than for singing.

The title "watch" is that it is some time after plugging it as usual on my EMU 1820, here I am with a sound that fluctuates and who finally cutting back a few minutes later and disappears new.
Having heard of some problems with the phantom power supply of the EMU, I order a nice little box that allows me to power two condenser microphones and there ... always the same!
I did not dare to start my incriminate B2-PRO and yet it is of him is the problem (I said he is always stored in its original plastic bag then put in the suitcase).
I dismounted and I realized that the head containing the capsule is somehow plugged into the body of the microphone and it may well be that the contacts merdouillent time. By slightly turning the head (without forcing either), the problem seems to have disappeared for some time. A monitor!

The Behringer B-2 Pro is a stereo large diaphragm condenser microphone that is designed for use in the recording studio. The mic has two separate capsules and all, along with it's own power supply and 5 pin cable. The mic has a frequency response ranging from 30 Hz to 20 kHz and has cardioid, figure eight, and omni directional pick up patterns to choose from. The mic also comes with a case and it's own shock mount.


OVERALL OPINION

As far as stereo microphones go, you aren't going to find many of them that are cheaper than the Behringer B-2 Pro . More and more you're starting to see microphones like this for cheaper, but I haven't seen many stereo microphones going for this low price. Of course you're getting a cheaply made stereo microphones, but it's a stereo microphone nonetheless and it actually sounds pretty nice. I've only used the Behringer B-2 Pro as a room microphone while recording a drum kit, but it did a really nice job of picking up the ambient sound in the room, while giving a very nice stereo spread feel. It's nice that you don't have to worry about phasing or anything, so in the future I'd definitely like to try out the Behringer B-2 Pro as drum overheads as well. I've used a few other microphones from Behringer, but this is probably the best bang for your buck out of any of them I've used. This would be fine in either a professional or home studio, but only in a professional studio if you're going to use it once and a while. If you want a stereo mic to use on a daily basis, I'd recommend something like the Shure VP88 instead, as it sounds better and will last longer. However, if you're interested in a good sounding stereo microphone on the cheap, the Behringer B-2 Pro is the way to go.

Condenser microphone condenser. Double Diaphragm "large."
3 Directivity: Cardio, Omni, Figure 8.

Rather for making voice, and recovery of instruments.

Comes with case and suspension.

OVERALL OPINION

Used for two years.

I've used other models in the same price range, the more expensive too, also different static tube ... but often out of budjet I can devote to music.

Most:
+ With no breath.
+ A made more correct than the majority.
+ A definition of "awesome" sound for a user accustomed to dynamic mics (I remember the first time I rubbed two fingers against each other in front of a condenser microphone, with the result Daus DT770 headphones closed . In perfect silence, I felt like my ear roamed the surface of every cell of my fingers, in a flurry light, precise and supernatural!)
+ Accessories.
Efficiency + in some cases on men despite her nasal voice characteristics (4KHz bump), it is possible to make it more neutral ... and less type, which is quite surprising!
+ A possible interest in troubleshooting couple over-head battery, because their lack of effectiveness in heart can take when they are placed high enough in both cymbals, and toms charlet ... (I said in troubleshooting.)

The -:
- Rejection of inadequate cardiovascular sounds.
- Little difference between gross and omni cardio, with a lack of precision in high-volume listening situations.
- Lower mediums quite dull and without much life (that's more felt than anything else ...).
- Difficulties with the way women, often becoming aggressive with some subtle EQ.
- The acute parraître may well defined, but in reality rather aggressive than well defined.
- Alignment of the diaphragm with the outside of the capsule unsatisfactory. I compared 3, was not a parreil. There was one who had more than 30 ° with the axis of difference! In cardio, you think back a tool after placing the micro ... no luck, it's 30 degrees next! (Heureusemet there ear to correct ...)

The -:
- Very great difficulty in bringing out the voices of the rest of the mix. This is the main drawback of this microphone. Alone, it sounds more than good for its price and any bluffs unsophisticated user. on the other hand, in the mix, the voice is difficult to place, whether naturally or with a lot of equalization. It remains in the background, does not fit in line with the rest and becomes really understandable with a little volume and natural cuts, ultimately destabilizing the mix. It is this which leads me to a very divergent opinions of some users who advocate the store Neumann, Brauner & Co. ...

This microphone is excellent for home studio use ... but in my opinion does not blockbusters, and it is also not his goal! Do not compare what is comparable ...
Final year, the price / quality ratio, because that is essentially very interesting for users whose goal is the demo recording, acoustic instruments, vocal ensembles ... without the fuss (or in association).
There is no real competitor in this price range, and approximates more expensive microphones brands.

The use of the windscreen for a voice recording is not appropriate, in my opinion, because it does not allow placement of reference between the singer and mic ...

Condenser microphone, I will not dwell on the specs, many others have done!

The accessories supplied (+ suspension + windshield case) are correct invoice, even if the suspension needs to be handled carefully.

The finish seems good, the micro trust. For 3 years I have, I have no problems.

OVERALL OPINION

SOUND:

When one is in its first static, we are always amazed! So much detail, as apparent definition, both sensitivity ... At first it does! And then we move to the professional (AKG C414 in my case) and then measuring the difference! Sometimes you read that micro (or others of the same class) are standard microphones to 1000 euros: NOTHING IS MORE WRONG! I regret having taken years to understand that!

In hindsight, we can say:
- The B2 has a good accuracy and a boost of high frequencies. On a low voice, spoken or serious, or a nylon guitar, it does very honorably! It's just natural, since missing the microphone creates high harmonics that distort the sound a bit. But that can not even realizes it when we can compare with a pro mic.

- The treatment of acute capacity becomes painful when you push on the voice. If you yell it, the sound becomes slightly aggressive, and you begin to gallery to the equalizer to mitigate this phenomenon. If your voice is nasal, or acute, I do not recommend this microphone!
In addition, it does not cash the very high levels of dynamic, fast ... and it saturates

- There are real holes in the low-medium frequencies! ... The comparison with the C414 is edifying! I found my voice in frequency ranges that I did not know!

- This micro lack of presence. You do not know to explain it, but you realize that bring out the vote in a responsible mix requires 3 or 4 plugins insert (comp, Equal ... etc) while a pro microphone gives you the right on.

I recommend a preamp that has a bit of character, if possible lamp (Blue Tube) rounded to the next "hard" the microphone.

The best advice I can give (I was given the same, but I did not listen!)
Spend much of your budget to the microphone! Believe me, you will not regret it! Even with a small preamp (Blue Tube, VTB-1) make do to nab an AKG C414, Neumann TLM103 or, for example ... 80% of your sound will be done! After the mix is ​​self-evident, the voice comes out alone, with natural warmth and balance! No Plugin can do nothing against using a microphone (such as B2), and I know what I mean! A C414 is 4 times more expensive, but 5 times better! Without a doubt ...

I put 7 as the quality / price is right!

Everything has been said ...

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for a little over a month to record tracks of acoustic instruments and vocals.

This microphone works great for recording acoustic guitars and classical. I also tested for the registration of harmonica and rendering is correct (to the limit a bit loud in the treble).

For cons, I did not like the song! It gives a sound and a cold, metallic timbre. Even with a pre-tube amp it's hard to fix it. You lose a lot of time to "hack" to get the equalizer at the end of a see through normal rendering.

Given its price, this microphone is a very good acquisition for a home studio. However, it is to know what use to give it. You can not record everything with and it's far from the Swiss Army knife that had behringer. Still I would do this choice.

Miking acoustic voice, violin and pipe organ
I tried the three keys.

OVERALL OPINION

For two months in room acoustics and recording in the studio.

The quality of manufacturing and accessories.

Micros DJ utiliss: AKG C1000S, NT3, CAD M177

To: In difficult conditions with many recording rverbe is the omni directivity given me the best rsultat with some atmosphere and a beautiful violin sound trs but impractical. For voice is the directivity in eight is the most efficient.

Cons: It is too heavy. It can be rough (loses precision) to a large mass of sound, a sound and aggressive in the treble gnre enough noise. Trs difficult to isolate even in cardioid mode.

More efficient in the studio atmosphere and much less prcis, balanced a Cad M177.

I use it for vocals, with a small prampli Behringer TUBE ULTRAGAIN MIC 200 lamp, to the computer music. I use it for voice and harmonica.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 1 year. The + + +: The sound seems good and prcis. The voice, organic and warm. No breath. Nothing wrong. I have not tried other models of micro condenser. Professionals are more demanding than I knew, but I'm happy with the trs rsultat and what I do, I could not gure esprer better. In addition, he has a mouth that micro book in his briefcase, made class. --- The: Only default finding the handle of the microphone was blackened trslgrement, may be in contact with its support. Or the + or -: I have, so far not seen any diffrence between the positions cardioid, omni, supercardiodes, but I did not really try to test them thoroughly. So, see ... Following a power recording studio, with high end mics (Neumann including ..) So Obviously, I need to have the ear of his aussiaiguise a Ingnieur chevraun trs is stupid, but I do not see the diffrence with the quality of Behringer (in rcoutant tracks one by one at home, with headphones). It Balot. Yes, I would do this choice. Good quality price.

micro versatile, colorful, but when you know it, we can judiciously need color.
condenser microphone.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 5 years.
I like his value for money stunning. I love her outstanding sound quality especially in omni (it's better than akg c 414 on this ground there ...) I like her less low end that lacks definition (for the cons is that less a 414 .. c) I like least is that the suspension gadget .. in fact do not count on it too if you want a REAL suspension.
I have owned micro Rode, AKG, I used the DPA, I know very well Shoeps. Of course the comparison does not really deal with DPA or Shoeps, but frankly for the price should not go without is a much better deal (Report Q / P) or a Rode audiotechnica ... in my opinion, but it's still a micro China. I said that I had four B2-Pro, and none have shown real differences in quality compared to others, the construction is quite reliable.
Value / Price unbeatable.
I would do without hesitation that choice, and sometimes I still use this microphone for its own qualities (especially in omni) are still useful to me. But I have a lot more expensive.

DUAL DIAPHRAGM CONDENSER MICROPHONE B-2 PRO
Studio condenser microphone and dual gold-plated large diaphragm
Condenser Microphone Dual large diaphragm and a''gold-plated for a better sound experience
Ideal as main or auxiliary microphone in studio and on stage
Directivity selectable cardioid, omnidirectional or bidirectional
Pressure gradient transducer with shock-capsule large diaphragm dual gold-plated
Ideal for acoustic instrument jacks, as overhead, etc..
Low-cut filter and-10dB input pad detachable
Transformerless FET input noise level extremely low distortion eliminating low frequency
Manufacture ultra solid brass body with nickel plated
Gold plated XLR output ensures perfect signal transmission
Suspension, windscreen and aluminum case included
High-quality components and exceptionally rugged construction ensure long life
Conceived and designed by BEHRINGER Germany

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 2 years and frankly at the outset, woahou cheerleaders, compared to my SM 58 (also perfect for live performance) using a micro static
changes everything.
I fed with a mini mic preamp from the same brand and a Line 6 UX1 to acquire software on my PC with Mixcraft to record.
Good value, solid, beautiful presentation briefcase with support and Bonetti, the sound is sometimes a little too inclined towards the treble, but nobody is perfect and certainly not an amateur musician that I am &% &% &% &%

Originally written by fabrice.fargues on Audiofanzine FR.

Condenser mic with different polar patterns (cardioid, omnidirectional, figure 8)
Low cut and 10dB pad
Sold with case, wind screen and suspension


OVERALL OPINION

I bought it twice: the manufacturing quality, the easy handling and the price appealed to me...
I use it to record choirs. The sound precision is ok. The definition is very good in high frequencies without being harsh. Very good for female vocals. The mids sound a bit too "hard." It captures the deepness of male voices but has a slight lack of warmth. A good preamp will compensate that a bit...
I was pleasantly surprised by the timbre reproduction of rich and complex sounding instruments like a clarinet or a flute, when close miking (otherwise the high frequencies are too emphasized). It can handle loud sources (trombone, trumpet) and is very versatile. Good product considering its very affordable price.
Of course, it's not a Neumann U87 (I'm a fan): it has neither the precision nor the warmth, but the value for money is very good.

Pros:

- comprehensive set of accessories
- Selectable polar pattern
- All-round mic
- Value for money
- Clean sound

Cons:
- Mids are a bit "hard"
- Overemphasized high frequencies
- Lack of warmth and roundness

It has never failed (no defects) after four years of use. With a good EQ and a good preamp, you'll get satisfying results but don't expect the same sound as an M149 because there is a huge difference between them... Very useful to learn and understand miking techniques (polar pattern, position, etc.) without going bankrupt... High-quality products will come later...

This is a studio condenser microphone. It is large diaphragm. This microphone probably wouldn't work well outside of a studio environment, but seeing as it's really cheap, it wouldn't be a horrible idea to experiment with it outside. I still woudn't use it in a live environment though, as it has few, if any, applications. The microphone has a -10 db pad as part of its features. It also has three different pickup patterns, normal, figure 8, and omnidirectional. It is almost like a cheaper version of a U87. It comes with a shock mount and clip, as well as a pop screen which is egg-shaped. The mic, as a condenser, requires phantom power to operate.

OVERALL OPINION

I was surprised to find that this mic is as good as it is, as the quality of Behringer products in general is often described harshly and negatively. This mic does work quite like a U87 does. I like to use it on acoustic guitars, vocals (especially spoken word, or rap). I've had it work decently on a piano too, but not a superb sound. When running them both through a high quality API mic pre, like I did at the studio I work for, the U87 beats it hands down, which is to be expected. However, at home on my Digi 002, and when recording a part that doesn't require a crystal clear signal, it's still worse, but not drastically so. Therefore, I'd have to say that I can really only recommend this microphone to home studio users. I haven't heard much about how durable it is, but I haven't had any issues with it breaking. I'm almost expecting it to, given Behringer's reputation, but so far it seems sturdy enough. I would certainly say that there are better mics out there, but none that are even remotely as cheap as this one.