View other reviews for this product:
kYZmar
Published on 01/20/05 at 14:26
Value For Money :
Correct
- At the sound is far from being terrible bass not too bad (although a little "stereo") but too Submitted, the upper register is not great and the high-medium, c is worse ...
Bon coutable remains, all is not that bad but it's true that it is not tip top either ...
- Insulation is not too bad, for drummers, is a lightweight but cases less "extreme" went well ... gnral plutt
- For comfort, good ... the supra-aural tour, I am not too fan but ... A circuit circumaural (around the ear) t would use more discreet. But it's not just for its price range ...
- The faux leather is not terribly comfortable, but also has the password.
- on the other hand, a feeling that one discrtement whispered in the ear, as on my 280Pro: one feels the HP too prs of the ear. I will say that the contact pressure too high, but not the top CHARACTERISTICS at the site of Sennheiser ... I'll add a little thickness of foam (like home), I think the problem arduira.
I give 5 as a note, because I think both sound than the insulation, comfort and quality manufacturing, it MRIT prs little mean, neither more nor less ...
I think this is a good solution for home studios, small radios, to a large network headphone (live recording ),...
A report qualitprix correct: I have not spent much time testing range, just the AKG K58 (version "professional" of K55) and I live off, without taking the time to cost: just too uncomfortable! I could not see spending more than 5 minutes on it ... But it is my opinion and only my opinion.
Compar a HD280 but the same manufacturer of high-end dynamic headphones closed (the two extreme !)... Well, the diffrence in price is really justified: both products are not comparable.
The HD280 is a good headphone and rev the HD202 is a product that dpanne well.
I bought one to cost my CD in the misleading '(not want to get bitten my HD280!) And the monitor when recording (in the same piece that is no nearfield zicos ...).
I think I will redeem at least one for dpanne or headphones for a network, if it takes time, though I took a good circumaural MODEL ...
Bon coutable remains, all is not that bad but it's true that it is not tip top either ...
- Insulation is not too bad, for drummers, is a lightweight but cases less "extreme" went well ... gnral plutt
- For comfort, good ... the supra-aural tour, I am not too fan but ... A circuit circumaural (around the ear) t would use more discreet. But it's not just for its price range ...
- The faux leather is not terribly comfortable, but also has the password.
- on the other hand, a feeling that one discrtement whispered in the ear, as on my 280Pro: one feels the HP too prs of the ear. I will say that the contact pressure too high, but not the top CHARACTERISTICS at the site of Sennheiser ... I'll add a little thickness of foam (like home), I think the problem arduira.
I give 5 as a note, because I think both sound than the insulation, comfort and quality manufacturing, it MRIT prs little mean, neither more nor less ...
I think this is a good solution for home studios, small radios, to a large network headphone (live recording ),...
A report qualitprix correct: I have not spent much time testing range, just the AKG K58 (version "professional" of K55) and I live off, without taking the time to cost: just too uncomfortable! I could not see spending more than 5 minutes on it ... But it is my opinion and only my opinion.
Compar a HD280 but the same manufacturer of high-end dynamic headphones closed (the two extreme !)... Well, the diffrence in price is really justified: both products are not comparable.
The HD280 is a good headphone and rev the HD202 is a product that dpanne well.
I bought one to cost my CD in the misleading '(not want to get bitten my HD280!) And the monitor when recording (in the same piece that is no nearfield zicos ...).
I think I will redeem at least one for dpanne or headphones for a network, if it takes time, though I took a good circumaural MODEL ...