Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
Our members also liked:
5.0/5(1 reviews)
100 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
poolos91Published on 01/12/09 at 15:53 (This content has been automatically translated from French)For singing, guitar and a bunch of acoustic instruments.
Attention relatively fragile. (Year 1930)
Micro lamp ec 92 (I think), replaceable today.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 4 months
warm sound really different from ms Neumann today. (Compared with TLM49)
other models tested. I prefer to U87, a standard not lower ms
q / p not given.
Yes I will ever be the choice. It is an object comparison ss.
Attention simply to voice sibilants. He does not forgive. Same for audio, it is very very sensitive.Read moreFor singing, guitar and a bunch of acoustic instruments.
Attention relatively fragile. (Year 1930)
Micro lamp ec 92 (I think), replaceable today.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 4 months
warm sound really different from ms Neumann today. (Compared with TLM49)
other models tested. I prefer to U87, a standard not lower ms
q / p not given.
Yes I will ever be the choice. It is an object comparison ss.
Attention simply to voice sibilants. He does not forgive. Same for audio, it is very very sensitive.See less00