View other reviews for this product:
Bernard Ancèze
Published on 01/24/08 at 07:31
Lamps, cardio or low-cut or pad. The construction seems slight, but he resists.
OVERALL OPINION
The MKL 2500 is a good microphone, almost very good, no glaring aberration, not dominant color, good output level. The bass and mid-bass lacks definition. It will benefit women's voices, the soprano and alto sax, flutes etc ... Piano, acoustic guitar = middle, the string quartet I like, acute and severe defined smooth. This microphone has no low-cut, or cut and a single directional, cardio. And that's a fair bit because, while it has no major fault he did not very strong personality (the medal and its reverse). Not easy to place, take his time. In production situation you do not always take time to overcome the defects of the material. It could compete with a U89 or C414, but there is always something wrong. Missing the low-cut, too far, too close, it's almost but not entirely satisfactory. Becaufe it is gasping senses that the good result is not far. For a few € more I much prefer a more comprehensive and easy C414 or 3 times as much, Of course the U89, but it is a micro already very interesting.
OVERALL OPINION
The MKL 2500 is a good microphone, almost very good, no glaring aberration, not dominant color, good output level. The bass and mid-bass lacks definition. It will benefit women's voices, the soprano and alto sax, flutes etc ... Piano, acoustic guitar = middle, the string quartet I like, acute and severe defined smooth. This microphone has no low-cut, or cut and a single directional, cardio. And that's a fair bit because, while it has no major fault he did not very strong personality (the medal and its reverse). Not easy to place, take his time. In production situation you do not always take time to overcome the defects of the material. It could compete with a U89 or C414, but there is always something wrong. Missing the low-cut, too far, too close, it's almost but not entirely satisfactory. Becaufe it is gasping senses that the good result is not far. For a few € more I much prefer a more comprehensive and easy C414 or 3 times as much, Of course the U89, but it is a micro already very interesting.