All user reviews of 4/5 for the Pioneer DJM-707

One of the big news of the beginning of 2004 ...
Mixer two ways:
- 2 line inputs
- 2 phono-line
- An input session
- A send / return for fx
- XLR Master 1
- Master 2 on rca
- A booth output
- Entered a mic combo
- 2 start (by fader or button)
Triple correction (switchable) + gain by

UTILIZATION

A little clutter to a 2-channel mixer, the bottom is littered with the state of diode reverse / fader start and another.
The switches in turn seem super fragile because too close and too upaders proméminents, I really afraid of breaking them stupidly.
Their position is adjustable comem it any mixer, except that here you are asked to bring home the Pio for that! It''s really nptk ...

Section adjusting fader / Xfade.
- Inversion of the 2 + cross upfader
- Adjusting the curve of the cross separately on each side
- Adjusting the curve of each upfader
- Adjusting the distance of attack of the crossfader
- Adjusting the hardness of the cross (not very noticeable and a little gadget I think ...)

The manual details extensively the different use of the start function and its agents, but who cares a finally force the manual is useless ...

SOUNDS

I clearly recognized the Pioneer (which I'm not a big fan) is far from the clarity of SA8 or SA12 but the ears accustomed to the Vestax will not be out of place ...

The sound is still good (I did not say excellent), breathless with dynamic honest, of course everything is subjective, but "appear" that the table includes a compressor, and the block diagram of Regar the table I came across a mysterious "HPF" (?!?) which is located between the module and the mix output block, ie all their transit through him ...

The equalizer is especially known to be very discreet I find that either + or - it is still very subtle but right now I could not listen on large system ...

OVERALL OPINION

I have the table for about 3 days, she has already suffered a session with five excited, and so far (I knock on wood) it going again ...

What I like about this table is the concept generally, the possibilities of using the 4 line. However the fact that it is a Pioneer (sound quality and price) is a bit hard to digest and I think the bottom too crowded and disorganized. but hey it's the engineers who make the table at Pioneer ... not dj

Another big problem in my opinion: the inverters.
They are great in the wrong place in the top left of the vertical part, and therefore are not aligned with the faders. This means that vosu can not adjust the table to the touch is essential to bend down to find the right button ...

So given my previous table: Gemini PS626/Killer 19, 3002 Numark, Vestax 05, DJM 300/500/600, Stanton SA8 - SA12 is not the best I've had tabel but if it totu the most expensive and the price is not justified (sound clarity, ergonomics).

I do referrer aps that choice (I say this every time) because I think that's 800 euro for abuse of dominant position, for me this table is 600 euro maximum for I have found less thought that Stanton SA12 and the sound is not what we expect from this price range. The compressor gives fishing but I do not feel quite the dynamic on the table, but I wait to test on a big system to get an idea of ​​its final ...

CONCLUSION:
Pioneer offers a table with interesting features, however, ergonomics (and certainly the sound) are not totu in line with the price but that's a habit must Pioner of consumers to absorb costly DJM909, DMP555 and DVD-DJ ...

Many connectors are available and therefore adaptable to most equipment.
No effect (it's not worse).

I think the table quite hot (?)... to see ...

UTILIZATION

The main functions are snuff in hand in less than 20 minutes. It's good that big table not laugh.

The manual is pretty good. Nothing is too much anyway.

Settings characters: everything is adjustable. it's true that it's not bad but in fact it typically cost to the default setting, otherwise it does strange things ...

A small flaw: the interlock Transform poorly located: just above the cross -> Sure enough, in the heat of the moment, I started a without realizing it and therefore selected another output unless I like it ... There's also other buttons that need to be careful not to inadvertently support.

I think it's the main flaw of this table must not have fingers to use them properly lumberjack

SOUNDS

I am disappointed that when you put the equalizer to a minimum, there is still sound coming out, a lot. In fact, it would have had there are kills. So it's my fault ... however, this is not really detrimental in mix and I finally learned that the kills were not far from a gadget, which is not present on the tables very high-end ...

Otherwise it's big sound. Not necessarily clear, but quality nonetheless. I like it ...

OVERALL OPINION

Warning: This is a table clearly intended to hip hop, RnB, scratch. No electro. I already knew before buying it but hey I still made for various reasons.

I have since late July 2005.

I like his general appearance, it's still good stuff I think. I do not like the fact that it not cut the sound when the equalizers are zero.

Previous model: a shit Expelec purchased crossroads, which was ultimately correct.

value for money: correct.

If it again, I again saw the same Denon X300 is no longer available!

Me that my table always fain especially coming from Pioneer.
Dja the XLR connection for the Master can take the table in the studio, proof that it is in the hardware business. I never test the functions of the CDJ FOR dpart.
SETTING THE personally the flexibility of the cross I really fesait pinball, but in fact it works perfectly s'avre, and the diffrence between the two extreme and standard: trs flexible ( too lightweight even for me) or drive.

UTILIZATION

The table is pretty well configured, trs linear forcment people come here. on the other hand, it is true that the manual is really vague, but hey it's not the one mackie 32 so even a novice understand the use.
The cuts are the cross prcises, and the cross are also rglages prcis trs. The strong cross the air, finally I am not a nag with me in a hard gnral, should be tested with a nag scratcher to see.

SOUNDS

The sound is clean, test on a big sound XLR I do not have the t too. I t tonn by qualisation: indeed it is a ct can be just as it does not cut the compltement frquence, but a perspective Sound I think the table has its own grain, and for me playing with this table qualizeur Has a real pleasure (trs is subjective).

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for six months, she flat well and I think I'll keep the cross may be too lightweight for my taste but the scratch does not impede too.
I am a tester and I srial test really great mix of tables, it parat me well for someone who wants the quality of gear.
APRS standard scratch is really good, the cuts are prcis and I think we can do anything with, APRS is a matter of taste, try it's always the same.
Well I must admit that I prfre even when a good big samurai to the scratch but it's not far trs I think anyway.