All user reviews of 3/5 for the Numark 5000FX

On CHARACTERISTICS there is nothing saying that while it possde rve the heart of a dj: effects effective faders correct beatkeaper and tap ... FUN

UTILIZATION

Fawn used trs intuitive without reading the manual it was under control after 48 hours

SOUNDS

The sound is clear and warm: no breath, however, could cut the EQ a bit more

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 11 months and I'm happy (and ITS EFFECTS). Personally I prfre the djm 600, but this is only my opinion ...

Parcontre must raise its reliability problem! She left 2 times dj in the Service because of alimntation which Cramm! Too bad, because the reliability is what is expected of a stuff called "professional"!

Despite this BMOL my verdict is positive: I love its sound and its effects, but Dornava I keep my home studio to make my mix and I go out, and ds the budget is the j'achte a djm 600 for "EXIT"

On paper it has all the necessary equipment to any beginner who hopes to develop a minimum.
XLR, 5 tracks, effects, ... that you ask for

UTILIZATION

It is very easy to take over the side a little too plastic for my taste, but given the price / performance ratio, there is no photo.

The purchase of this console was for me the transition from the mix console to mix on USB console independently with platinum cd.

It has good ergonomics and does not open the manual.

SOUNDS

The sound quality is well worth its price can not be compared with a table that costs € 800 or more.

OVERALL OPINION

A table with a good value if you take care enormously.

It is very semsible to dust!

Rackable table but the brackets are optional.

MASTER OUT connectors XLR, RCA, 3 phono, 9 lines
Box effect etc.

For the rest, see the datasheet.

UTILIZATION

Easy to use, no need to open the manual for primary functions.

However, the function sampler, loops etc. requires a look at the doc.
The box effect is quite simple to use.

SOUNDS

The knobs and faders (including the master) "crack" after a few months of use.
The equalizer is not terrible especially at the bass kills: S

At the level of breath, like bin at the beginning I did not pay attention but after several months we hear clearly.

OVERALL OPINION

Buy new in 2006, I liked the box effect with the jog at the beginning and then dropping off the effects and ultimately I do not use it anymore.

I had in my possession two other tables Numark (DM3050 DMX09 and I regret), I tried tables Gemini, Technics, Gemini --- Eclerc same quality after Numark Technics etc ... it's a different budget but the quality is there.

I just separate myself for Allen & Heath Xone 42: love:

In summary: I am particularly disappointed with the effects box and equalizer.

The manufacturing quality is poor with time and use.
Looking back, I will not go that choice.

It is better to put a little more money in a table better and have no worries with only a few months.

Originally written by Droopy5915 on Audiofanzine FR.

Rack mixer with optional mounting brackets.

Master out on XLR and RCA connectors. Three phono inputs and nine line inputs.
Effects processor

For other features, read the specs sheet


UTILIZATION

Easy to use: you don't need to read the manual for the main applications.

On the other hand, the sampler and loop functions require that you take a look at the manual.
FX processor simple to use.


SOUNDS

The pots and faders generate noise after a few months of use.
The EQ is not impressive, especially the kill function for the lows :S

Same thing regarding noise: in the beginning, I didn't notice but after few months of use, it's impossible to ignore it.


OVERALL OPINION

I bought it new in 2005. In the beginning, I liked the FX processor with its jog wheel but the effects became boring so I don't use them anymore.

I already owned two other Numark mixers (DM3050 and DMX09). I tried out Gemini, Technics and Eclerc mixers. Gemini products provide the same quality as Numark. Technics and co. are much better but also more expensive.

I sold it to buy an Allen&Heath Xone 42. Nice!

Summary: I was particularly disappointed by the FX processor and the EQ.

The manufacturing quality is not good enough to withstand years of use.
Based on my experience, I wouldn't buy it again.

It's better to spend a couple of bucks more for a better mixer to avoid problems after some months of use.