All user reviews of 5/5 for the Samson Technologies Resolv 65a

The technical specifications that have motivated my choice:

Not to take anything that has t said before, I would say that Resolv65a are indeed remarkable in every sense of the word. (Finishing, Aesthetics, and connectors rglages, sales of low front)
The price is reasonable trs screws from the competition and at the same quality sound
The arrangement of my monitors is such that I had no parasites at ESG, I have closer to my screen (Iiyama) less than 20 cm and no worries or no monitors at the level the same notch it. In my opinion the screen is more than enough and I also think that some notches may be better conus.
It is true that a slightly warm (not more than other active monitors for that matter) but hey!
The rear face is not too bad, I'd even done well, leaving some originality this product. (Well I will not m'terniser )

SOUNDS

Well for the record, having worked with several major brand or even have the cost and test (Alesis, Yamaha NS10, the Fostex PM-1, M-Audio BX8, Beringer TRUTH B2031, of krk V6, V8, Mackie HR824, Yamaha MPS5, GENELEC 1030A - The NS10, 1030A, and HR824 V6, V8 Studio Pro) I would say that RESOLV 65a tonn me by the quality of sound and their power.
In compare with friends mixes made with in the studio with NS10 and then with RESOLV 65a we concluded that the only matres board are our ears, and we gots our style. The mix taient all as thundering as each other. Like every human being is unique we do not perceive things the same fawn at the same instant (in fact fortunately!)

- The curve is neutral frequency drives and corrected in case.

- Stereo image is excellent. Once the speakers well placed, the precision is remarkable.

- The sound is clear trs, although prcis across the spectrum, low trs trs agree well despite what some say on the forums. The bass may even be trs heavy, with excellent precision (again, make your own expriences) now, depending on what you want to mix or take a box. The acute excelled net clean and shine well.

- The dynamic is amazing and well respected. Surprising even when the template for the speakers. They will surprise you, test them and you tell me the news. For pregnant Proxim nothing better. They respect the quality of your mixes high and low volume. No draping observation.
Perfection n'tant not of this world, it is well worth 9 / 10 10/10 but I vote to give a boost that will make these monitors and mritent proven to have a place in the world Audio Pro.

OVERALL OPINION

Use for 10 months.

Say anything except that "pay what is Samson Samson." They are Gniales. I have friends who make their mix of big names and found them all as gniales. (It should be tamed his gear)
Again, make your choice based on your ideas of music, your style, your feelings, your exprience forcment for some and not with everyone else.
In my opinion the best tools will not forcment the best sounds when the musician is dpourvu sense of logic and crativit.
The biggest highlight studios such and such stuff because for some, be "BIG" is to buy what is more, it's as close to but watch out marketing, sponsorship and the socity of consumption in which we live.

There is no reason quune good mix appears from your home with RESOLV 65a

To recommend the report qualitprix excellent and the rest too.

Cest the man who tames the gear and not the other way but good design and all the rest ......

With exprience, it's a choice I would do without hsiter.

Musically,

First monitors in my possession, I was looking to replace my Hi-Fi set which I used to COSTS Systm of previously and whose trs trs trs silent rendering of what diffrent I had the headphones. So I have notice of an amateur who might be in enlighten others in the same case.
I orient my choice of product for the following reasons:

1 - opinions with other users among them, people who could compare this to other hardware range and this config in their home. This product seems plutt good for its class: power, speaker (diameter / bass response ,...), coloration of sound ergonomics.
I for one did not compare with other instructors, I would say that nanmoins 75W/25W are pretty impressive and I do not really see why they would need more. At home, the cost is 20% of the rgl max. Likewise, the diameter of the woofer provides a low return correct, at least Fidler. If I want more, I can always hook up my hi-fi amplifier
Ditto for the quality of sound, though I look, I see no diffrence for the time between his headphone and the sound of these monitors. Ergonomics is good unless you DCID to control the volume directly on the speakers. I use my table to mix the output level, continuously monitors both 20%.
Note, a mode of eco NRGi that cuts the amps after a while (I think 10 minutes) of inactivity.

2 - the price: yes, they are cheap so what? as a novice, has made me a little afraid to invest in this kind of hardware with an elastic my wallet. Two fingers to take the NF06A Thomann, half the price, I finally chose them by compromise between the popularity and price. I'm waiting to find someone who has to judge whether the NF06A it possible to have silent as well (relative to need) for even cheaper.

3 - I need: in an amateur home studio, in a room together without sound worthy of the name, these monitors are utiliss component cost for guitar / synthvoix Save to PC Waveterminal 192M through a POD2 a SBLive for drums / bass / synth and a Yamaha MG10 table / 2. It seemed to me that given the quality of the recording chain / restitution, nothing served to go higher in the range of monitors. I am satisfied with this choice trs in this context.

I use the entries symtriques TRS 6.3. These monitors have nanmoins XLR input (symtriques) or RCA (asymtriques).

SOUNDS

No noticeable diffrence over costs at the headphone.
Several possible rglages curve frequency drives (MID FREQ).
Clear, full, dynamic sound.
Low frequencies properly made.
Power to go bous.
Shielded environment without default for PC + screen + amp + effects + guitar ...

OVERALL OPINION

APRS 2 months of use, I am so far satisfied with this product trs.
Efficient, no frills.
On the form, these monitors are less sober than some other parraitront and the same shot a little less certain pros ... the blue LEDs are nice and the standby mode is welcome if you do not want to tamper Derri re every 5 mins.
I did not test other monitors and consquent, it is difficult to assess objectively the report qualitprix but since this product is among the cheapest in the range and it is perfect in my context of use, which must be one of many AF members, I would simply say that if c'tait again, would be the case without hsiter.
Purchased from Musik-Produktiv for 344? pair in 09/2004.

- 2-way active - bass reflex with wind laminar faade.
- Bi-amplified 75W bass + 25W (RMS well sr).
- Bandwidth (APRS to my doc) 45 Hz> 22 kHz

- Boomer 16.5 cm 6.5 "titanium tweeter and a 2.5 cm" pice with phasing.

- Between 1 XLR - 1 x RCA (gold plated!) - Jack from a 6.35 (symtrique and asymtrique)

- A volume and a correction of mdium the rear.
- Switch power on the rear.

I put 9 / 10 only because it would t better to put in rglages faade.

SOUNDS

Dpendant rglage of the mdiums (the rear knob), the sound can be completely neutral (mdium 0) - Stereo sound more (mdium -1) or strengthen mdium (NS10 and Genelec sound type).
Stereo image as it is exemplary. It locates each sound perfectly. In addition, these monitors are not too prescriptive, which keeps a good image Stromme so eccentric.

The sound is really clear trs including the entire spectrum. This also does not forgive bad mix with ...
The bass is perfect with Dfine mdium warm. The treble can not rest, as they are both trs "son" and powerful.

For the dynamic, trs important point: It is standard!

It's amazing what these monitors and especially restore cashing! I did not even pushed back so the volume is important is to say ...
The bass can be gentle but they can also hit hard, trs trs down low. And all this while remaining fully Dfine! No need to invest in a subwoofer, it would be too much for a cost of proximity. Besides, I do not understand Samson Specifies a BP on their site down 62 Hz, while on my note book with the speakers it is marked 45 Hz?!
All I can say is that it descends down. In any case below 62 Hz, sr!

So the dynamics, one word: HUGE!

OVERALL OPINION

I am in love since ending for a month.
I love their sound and their dynamic gnrale. The finish exudes quality. In fact I love everything about these monitors!

What I like least, though I find I can not find ... Finally, if the fact that they can be quite warm. But that does not appear to pose problem and must be Conuention for.

Actually, I tried other models such as M-Audio, Behringer B2030. I prfr Samson as the opinions are unanimous in the positive Resolv65. I found the bass and dynamics Dfine greater.
The report qualitprix is ​​excellent. The Samson Chres are the least of the three!

Without hsiter, I would do this choice. Moreover j'espre soon buy two pairs to switch to multichannel monitoring.

Future that require very recognized REFERENCE - A MUST

Uh, frankly I chose based on price and forums AF, thank you for all of you also because I do not really regret my choice.
Usage: trs small home studio to the electro. They had to be not too large as I step back. No wind the rear bass reflex in order to put the wall prs.
Config: they are powered by a sound card EDIROL UA 25

SOUNDS

I am not a professional sound, I do not know what value my ears. REFERENCE is my only my cost on my hardware HiFi "high end" (Onyx 713K2 JMLab speakers, amplifier and CD Onkyo Integra SERIES, wiring own blind). I just t bluff by the precision sound of the little things. The highs are sparkling trs, trs so well for monitor, the bass is good Submitted (this is also true that I am the corner between two walls which strengthens). They seem neutral, a bit aggressive in the treble, however, but again I find a good rev to compose. The image stro frankly with an amp for each cot I do not see how it could not be good ...
The sound is clear and for me trs prcis across the spectrum, but with a small hole in the mdium around 3500-3800Hz and then c my JMLab with a 3500-3800Hz tip? But I look for the hole because plutt aprsvrification lgre I had a hump in my qualisation this frquence qualiseur mastering. Mchant nothing anyway.
RULES are in neutral, may be I should change a. ..

OVERALL OPINION

I have for a month.
I love them, so much so that now I have CD Listen to it to thoroughly understand
C The least the power button and the stop-knobs of the adjustable rear, but well faade would not have made a pretty and would disrupt the sound.
I never cost of the monitors before them.
Report qualitprix really excellent, when I think of my 4500 euros Hifi together ... even if the cost is not the same it is true (the JMLab a strong if pete trs you get angry and without any disturbance!)
As long as I have not cost the other I Rasht same eyes closed

Last day 8.5
It's been a little more time than I use and I must say that even if I love them as always, I am somewhat in agreement with Brahma as to flicker. You really have acute Submitted trs and plutt in the upper part of the spectrum, for this to become standard on other Systmes of cost. So the ears are a lightweight blow because it gives her a trs aggressive, but the "benefit" is that one just a short and clear trs trs prcise of everything about things and other noises. So I go down in note 9.

- What characteristics have motivated your choice?

The advertised power, shielding, solid appearance, the look, the jack or XLR inputs, Mid control

- For what purpose?

Essentially the recording and listen to homestudio amp simulator (AdrenaLinn GNX4 and 2).

- What amp / What configuration? ...

65 announced ... and they are there!

SOUNDS

- The frequency curve is sufficiently neutral?

I find these speakers very neutral to the extent that high volume can become very tiring to the ears ... a small flat for mediums that need a little adjustment.
Send the bass you need without making the porridge that is a treat with my Gibson, whose character "serious" is historically said! The treble can just "whistle" at high speed.

- The stereo image is good?

Nickel chrome ... it changes from enciente multimedia ... we are in another world and become a treat mix when you're picky in the placement of sounds.

- The sound is clear and precise on the spectrum?

Yes, he is with the flat at high volume. But I am in a small room, gold, high volume is not sustainable ... so my flat is not "neutral"

- The dynamics are respected? ...

2norme momentum after several attempts elsewhere, is the main feature that made the song to bring these speakers.

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?

4 months now

- What is so special that you like most and least?

As I said above ... dynamics huge, the bass really well (for a small room 12 m2).
What I like moisn is the power behind each speaker. Maneuver painful!
Attention as they heat up faster then carefully vented behind in your disposal ... inquiry, it is normal ...

- Have you tried many other models before buying it?

Uh ... yes there I think I try everything that exists on the market between 300 and 500 euros a pair!

- How would you rate the quality / price?

The value for money is excellent for those who want the real monitoring speakers that do not compensate with a large dynamic (bass and drums come out badly on these machines! My neighbors would love if they liked the music) and the bass response.

- With experience, you do again this choice? ...

Yes, without hesitation ... Now that I've found I'm not going to change anytime soon

What characteristics have motivated your choice?
For what purpose?

I needed the monitor to record, mix and mastering dessu and a small surplus puissanse n is thus seen not refuse the price and the reviews on Audiofanzine, I have purchased. (Thank you for that matter)

What amp / What configuration? ...

I work with cubase and hoontec DSP 2000

SOUNDS

The frequency curve is sufficiently neutral?

I think the midle and treble are very aggressive but only at home or because I've tried, it sounded good. (A medium sized piece with lots of echo floating)

The stereo image is good? The sound is clear and precise on the spectrum? The dynamics are respected? ...

I find that c is very decent for the price. Good image, its accurate (a bit) and a super BIG PLUS dynamique.UN C is the volume which is surprising, even powerful.

OVERALL OPINION

I have a year and the quality of my songs and much higher. J had tried it once and I know what tannoy that coutait 50,000 francs a pair and I think the quality difference n is not as important as price. I think before making the same choice, I would have tried the 50 who had perhaps better suited to my room but the 65 has a OCEEI well soundproofed, it makes good.

- What characteristics have motivated your choice?

Power spectrum, dimension

- For what purpose?

For the mix, record sound without coloration.

- What amp / What configuration? ...

amp not just out of my master table.
Mixer Ecler Smac Pro 40 + 2 CDJ800 (Pioneer)

SOUNDS

- The frequency curve is sufficiently neutral?

impec 'a bit too low, but otherwise nikel.

- The stereo image is good?

Yes, after this depends on the installation. but I think to have them at ear level is impeccable '...

- The sound is clear and precise on the spectrum?

yes just ds deep bass, ability to set mediums really well ...

- The dynamics are respected? ...

Yes.

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?

for 5 months now.
- What is so special that you like most and least?

power, clear sound with no coloration, just as little power not fully exploitable to me, sniff! but operated in return for halloween pub they are hell

- Have you tried many other models before buying it?

no, I trust the opinions of several different monitoring, and make my choice, it's risky but I'm happy with the result.

- How would you rate the quality / price?

well.

- With experience, you do again this choice? ...

again and rather than 2 times

What characteristics have motivated your choice?

bi amplification: 75 watts and 25 watts for the tweeter.
30Hz-30kHz bandwidth and a + - 3 db.
45Hz-20kHz and a + - 3 db.
For what purpose?
home studio, home mix.


What configuration? ...
connected to motu traveler

SOUNDS

- The frequency curve is sufficiently neutral?
- The stereo image is good?
- The sound is clear and precise on the spectrum?
- The dynamics are respected? ...
nothing to say.

modif after 5 days, ca still a bit flatter, cest hard hard to balance anyway to go anywhere on a mix of several support sheets.
but I must say jai never heard my mix that's how it scales, cest still very clear.

OVERALL OPINION

Nothing to say.
jai tried two models of Tapco, fostex 2, 1 ... Berhinger (What a waste of time the Behring)
unbeatable value for money.

I use to mix my models with the Korg D3200,
is the preamplified
25W acute
75W bass

SOUNDS

I chose the RESOLV65A for accuracy and good dynamic
just before, the seller made me listen to PRODIPE (FRO) which lacks clarity and momentum, I quickly made my choice.

the upper midrange is a little tough

lacks a little low but we must know how to use

OVERALL OPINION

I use them for 4 months

I tried ALESIS (its very light, as acute)
of PRODIPE (sound like the speakers to buy SUPER U)
M-AUDIO (better to take a hi-fi)

decent value for money
the sound is good, I know not what they will give over time

I bought this more pair of speakers by following the advice of my dealer in comparison to others. C'tait qualitprix the report I was looking for the era: a time that fell within my budget, both the sound I liked right away (I must say that I went to Coutes trsmdiocres!).
I used these speakers for 4 years to monitor any type of sound and music work.

SOUNDS

The curve is obviously not neutral on this type of product trs affordable. The serious and are prcis plutt well doss but lack potato, dynamics. They do not descend below trs but given the size of HP is a bit normal! The low-mids are poorly Defines and mediums plutt correct. L o these speakers do a good job is in the high-mids: prcis and highlighted (may sound rude to some) they put the bare signal fawn Drout (the slightest false note, any cart on a song, a saxophone or violin means right away). These speakers are quite effective for the treatment of voices and other sounds whose spectral energy is concentrated in areas like frquentielles.
The image is good stro condition of being well located in relation to the speakers: the correct position located in a well prcise! ! So pay attention to placement, if the image changes a lot, not to mention the rpartition treble.
What m'amne that they are quite aggressive and a little whistling in the ear training ... Not so good in fact!

OVERALL OPINION

But then when the same price ... INTERESTED!
APRS four years of using these speakers are good for me to learn to fawn monitoring cheaply. Exprience with it comes to find their limits, little by little, and what better? This proves that the hearing is refined. ^ ^