Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
Tutorial

Magnetic tapes: R2R systems

By EloMCBo on 01/14/2023 - (Intermediate)
Enlarge
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Teac A-3440
Images
1/144
Teac A-3440

Analog Multitrack from Teac

Write a user review or Ask for a user review
Reviews
Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums

Hello,

this tutorial aims to describe the important parameters of magnetic tapes

It  is a translation of a French version (under review); English is not my mother tongue; in a firrst step I will use google translation
to summarize the characteristics of some bands available in 2023 on the market.

There are several reference standards, I only own the IECs and have found partial copies of the NABs.

Reference standards

IEC 60094-6 (1985) Sound recording and playback systems on magnetic tapes - Part 6: Reel-to-reel systems
IEC 60094-2 (1994) Magnetic tape recording and playback systems - Part 2: Standard magnetic tapes

excerpts from 60094-2: any standard master tape must include at least the following sections:
1) reference level;
2) azimuth adjustment;
3) amplitude/frequency response.
Each section should be taped at an angle of 90° ± 1', relative to the edge of the tape.

Composition of a magnetic tape

The magnetic tape is made up of different layers as shown in the sketch below

Tape layers

The support material (base, substrate) can be

paper (the very first) stable but fragile
AC cellulose acetate, not stable
PVC, sturdy
PE polyester, polyethylene; stable (not polyester urethane)

the different materials are more or less resistant to the action of time and in particular to humidity.

The tensile force for an elongation of 3% varies according to material, width and thickness; same stress at break.

With all the physical, chemical and magnetic parameters, we can calculate a 'score' for the lifetime of the magnetic tape. Certain makes/models should be avoided. The number of saves/erases has practically no influence. Thus, mentions such as "registered only once" should not be taken into account when purchasing; these are often archival tapes that are good for the trash because chemically/physically damaged and will completely mess up your tape recorder in seconds. The box, the reel may be of interest.

Dimensions and distribution of tracks

Band width:

  • CEI 60094-6 (1985) 6.3 mm = 0.248 inch et non 1/4 " (graphe ci-dessous)
  • NAB NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS Cartridge "Tape Recording and Reproducing" (1964) 0.246 inch
  • NAB E416 (1965) 0.246 ± 0.002

Tape size

Band Thickness:

there are 4 thicknesses, there are small differences depending on the manufacturer; 'designations' are not standardized

'standard play' 52 µm total thickness
'long play' 35 µm total thickness
'double play' 26 µm total thickness
'triple play' 18 µm total thickness

depending on the thickness, we can put more or less strip [m] on a coil, the thickness of magnetic oxide is independent;

the playing time will vary as in the table below

Reel Dia Length Thickness [cm/s] [cm/s] [cm/s] [cm/s] [cm/s] [cm/s]
[cm] [m] [µm] 2.38 4.76 9.525 19.05 38.1 76.2
13 180 52 128 64.0 32.0 16.0 8.0 4.0
13 270 35 192 96.0 48.0 24.0 12.0 6.0
13 360 26 256 128.0 64.0 32.0 16.0 8.0
13 540 18 384 192.0 96.0 48.0 24.0 12.0
18 360 52 256 128.0 64.0 32.0 16.0 8.0
18 540 35 384 192.0 96.0 48.0 24.0 12.0
18 720 26 512 256.0 128.0 64.0 32.0 16.0
18 1080 18 768 384.0 192.0 96.0 48.0 24.0
27 760 52 532 266.0 133.0 66.5 33.3 16.6
27 1080 35 768 384.0 192.0 96.0 48.0 24.0
27 1440 26 1024 512.0 256.0 128.0 64.0 32.0
27 2160 18 1536 768.0 384.0 192.0 96.0 48.0
30 1100 50 768 384.0 192.0 96.0 48.0 24.0

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Fabricant
modèle
année
base
coating
back coating
total
Pays
Brand
type
year
[µm]
[µm]
[µm]
[µm]
ISO2
AGFA
 F
 1948-
16
 56
De
AGFA
 PEM369
 1988-1990
20
11.5
1.5
33
De
 AGFA
 PE31
 1958-1968
20
14.5
no
35
De
AGFA
 PE39
 1986-1990
23
8
--
35
De
BASF
DP26
1996-
15.5
9
1.5
26
De
BASF
DP26 LH
1970-
15.5
9
1.5
26
De
BASF
DPR26 LH
1973-
15
10
1.5
29
De
BASF
 LG/LGN
 1948-1952
30
26
 56
De
BASF
LP35
1970-
10
35
De
BASF
LP35 LH
1970-
10
35
De
BASF
LPR35
1996-
20
11
4
 35
De
BASF/RMG
PER528
1991-2003
30
14
4
48
De
BASF/RMG
SM.468
 1995-2003
30
14.5
48.5
De
BASF/RMG
 SM.900
 1995-2003
30
18
52
De
ATR
Master tape
-2003-
36
12.5
0.8
50
US
ATR
MDS-36
-2003-
24
12.5
0.8
37.5
US
Capture
914
-2022-2023-
36
9
3
48
Capture
930
-2022-2023-
19
9
3
31
Maxell
 UD18
 18
JP
Maxell
 UD25
 25
JP
Maxell
 UD35
-1979-2002-
 35
JP
Maxell
 UD50
-1979-
 50
JP
Quantegy
 406
-2002-
 35.4 (1.40)
10.1
0.8
46.3
US
Quantegy
 407
-2002-
 21.5 (0.85)
10.1
0.8
32.4
US
Quantegy
 456
-2002-
 35.4 (1.4)
12.7
0.8
48.9
US
Quantegy
 478
-2002-
 35.4 (1.4) 
15.2
0.8
52.2
US
Quantegy
 479 = 478
-2002-
479-1586LL
15.2
1/4”x 1650’
 plastic R 7"
US
Quantegy
 480
-2002-
35.4
15.2
0.8
51.4
US
Quantegy
 499
-2002-
 35.4 (1.4)
15.2
0.8
51.4
US
Quantegy
632
 -2002-2023-
36 (1.42)
7.9
43.9
US
Quantegy
642
-2002-2023-
22.4 (0.88)
7.8
30.2
US
Quantegy
652
-2002-2023-
12.2 (0.480)
7.8
20
US
Quantegy
661
-2022-2023-
12.2 (0.480)
5.6
17.8
US
Quantegy
795
 25.3 (1.0)
5.1
1
31.4
US
Quantegy
 GP9
-2002-
35.4
17.7
0.8
50.9
US
RTM
LPR35
-2022-2023-
20
11
35.5
Fr
RTM
LPR90
-2022-2023-
20
12
35.5
Fr
RTM
SM468 
-2022-2023-
30
14.5
48.5
Fr
RTM
SM.900
-2022-2023-
30
19
52
Fr
RTM
SM911
-2022-2023-
30
16
50
Fr
Scotch 3M
111
 1948-
38.1
17.8
55.9
US
Scotch 3M
206 (21)
1979-
15.2
5.6
20.8
UK
Scotch 3M
206 (50)
 1969-1979-
36.1
14.2
 52.8
US
Scotch 3M
207 (15)
1979-
9.5
5.6
15.1
UK
Scotch 3M
207 (35)
 1969-1979-
21.6
14.2
 38.4
US
Scotch 3M
250
1979-
33
16.5
2
51.5
UK
Scotch 3M
256
1979-
33
17
3
53
UK
Scotch 3M
265
1979-
20
3.8
2.5
26.3
UK
Scotch 3M
806
 1986-
36.1
10.2
 48.3
US
Scotch 3M
807
 1986-
23.4
10.2
 35.6
US
Scotch 3M
908
 1993-
 35.1
9.1
 46.2
US

Note (year) put on the market: '1948-' beginning; '-1995' end; '-1979-' or '-2001-2023-' seen in a magazine, a site that (these) year(s) there
Magnetic characteristics
Bias (recording and playback)

It seems to me necessary here to give some explanations on the magnetic properties of a tape, their composition and details on the heads of recording and reading. In addition, it is necessary to take a look at the principle of AC polarization (tutorial on AF)
The main magnetic quantities used are:
Magnetic flux (unit: Wb)
Flux density B (unit: T) = 10,000 Gauss
Magnetic field strength H (unit: A/m)
They are linked by the equations: B = µ x H [1 x A/m]; Φ = B x S [T x m²]
The saturation flux density of professional tapes is < 100 mT
A typical value for the maximum value of the flux density recorded in the emulsion of a magnetic tape is 50 mT. This would be achieved at the maximum value of a full record level record.

Calculation 1

The effective value of this flux density is then
Brms=0.71*50mT=35mT
The total flux in the ribbon emulsion is then the product of the flux density and the magnetic surface area. This surface is the product of the width of the tape and the thickness of the emulsion.
S=6.3mm*14μm=9*10-8m²
Φrms = 35 mT * 9 * 10-8 m² = 3150 pWb
This total flux in the emulsion is normally related to the track width. Therefore, we state it in terms of flux per mm of track width: Φrms/width = 3150 pWb / 6.3 mm = 500 pWb / mm = 500 nWb / m
It's a bit unusual for me to see Wb/m, we can see in the detail above that it's the right unit (you can replace the 6.3 mm by the magnetic width of 1.05 mm in the case of 4 tracks , the value is the same)
This is a typical value for the flux level used in modern tape recording (professional equipment) in yellow in the tables below

Ref fluxivity cal tape [nWb/m] desired ref Fluxivity [nWb/m]
1 kHz (700Hz)
185
200
250
G.320
355
500
180 (185) 0.00 dB -1.00 dB -3.00 dB -4.00 dB -6.00 dB -9.00 dB
200 1.00 dB 0.00 dB -2.00 dB -3.00 dB -5.00 dB -8.00 dB
250 (260) 3.00 dB 2.00 dB 0.00 dB -1.00 dB -3.00 dB -6.00 dB
320 4.00 dB 3.00 dB 1.00 dB 0.00 dB -2.00 dB -5.00 dB
355 (370) 6.00 dB 5.00 dB 3.00 dB 2.00 dB 0.00 dB -3.00 dB
500 9.00 dB 8.00 dB 6.00 dB 5.00 dB 3.00 dB 0.00 dB
  • 3M data induction 50-150 mT

Retentivity tapes evolution

  • below fluxivity values found in the literature (column 1), tape datasheet or on the net (forum)
  • knowing that the signal current is about 3 to 20% (here 14.6 & 21%) of the bias signal, based on "calculation 1" we can make an estimate of column 2-3-4 (each manufacturer has decided based on SN ratio, THD etc)
    we take the coating thicknesses in the table above
Fabricant
modèle
Hc coercivity
Brms
Saturation flux
Fluxivity
Fluxivity
Fluxivity
Fluxivity
Brand
type
[kA/m (Oe)]
[mT]
[nWb/m]
[nWb/m]
[nWb/m]
14.6%
21%
AGFA
F
6.8
34
540
(79) 112
79
112
AGFA
PEM369
27.2
115
1350
(193) 272
193
272
AGFA
PE31
23.5
95
1380
(201) 284
201
284
AGFA
PE39
27.2
135
1080
(158) 222
158
222
BASF
DP26
26 (325)
145
1300
250-320
(191) 269
191
269
BASF
DP26 LH
(310)
110
1100
250
(145) 204
145
204
BASF
DPR26 LH
(310)
120
1200
320
(175) 247
175
247
BASF
LG/LGN
6.4
26
--
(99) 139
99
139
BASF
LP35
(300)
90
250
(131) 185
131
185
BASF
LP35 LH
(310)
110
250
(161) 227
161
227
BASF
LPR35
25
165
1800
(265) 374
265
374
BASF/RMG
PER528
137
1920
(280) 395
280
395
BASF/RMG
SM.468
30
140
1990
320
(296) 418
296
418
BASF/RMG
SM.900
28.6
134
2410
(352) 497
352
497
ATR
Master tape
26.3
140
320
(256) 361
256
361
ATR
MDS-36
26.3
140
320
(256) 361
256
361
Capture
914
(360)
130
1950
(171) 241
171
241
Capture
930
(360)
130
1950
(171) 241
171
241
Maxell
UD18
200
(0) 0
0
0
Maxell
UD25
(0) 0
0
0
Maxell
UD35
(0) 0
0
0
Maxell
UD50
(0) 0
0
0
Quantegy
406
26.3 (330)
130
1400
(200) 250
(192) 270
192
270
Quantegy
407
26.3 (330)
130
--
(192) 270
192
270
Quantegy
456
25.5 (320)
150
2300
(250) 355
(278) 392
278
392
Quantegy
478
29.5 (370)
140
--
(311) 438
311
438
Quantegy
479
29.5 (370)
140
--
(311) 438
311
438
Quantegy
480
29.5 (370)
140
(311) 438
311
438
Quantegy
499
31.1 (390)
160
2900
(355) 500
(355) 501
355
501
Quantegy
632
24.7 (310)
110
--
(127) 179
127
179
Quantegy
642
24.7 (310)
110
1000
(--) 200
(125) 177
125
177
Quantegy
652
24.7 (310)
110
--
(125) 177
125
177
Quantegy
661
24.7 (310)
110
--
(90) 127
90
127
Quantegy
795
27.5 (345)
100
--
(74) 105
74
105
Quantegy
 GP9
29.5 (370)
160
413
583
RTM
LPR35
25.5 (320)
127
1800
(204) 288
204
288
RTM
LPR90
29.5 (370)
158
2400 ?
320
(277) 391
277
391
RTM
SM468
30
140
1990
320
(296) 418
296
418
RTM
SM.900
29.5 (370)
154
2319
320
(427) 603
427
603
RTM
SM911
25.5 (320)
145
2320
320
(339) 478
339
478
Scotch 3M
111
21.6
90
1024
(--) 200
(234) 330
234
330
Scotch 3M
206 (21)
25.6
105
1488
(200) 250
(86) 121
86
121
Scotch 3M
206 (50)
25.6
105
1488
(200) 250
(218) 307
218
307
Scotch 3M
207 (15)
25.6
105
1488
(200) 250
(86) 121
86
121
Scotch 3M
207 (35)
25.6
105
1488
(200) 250
(218) 307
218
307
Scotch 3M
250
30.2 (380)
120
(289) 408
289
408
Scotch 3M
256
30.2 (380)
100
1050
(320)
(248) 350
248
350
Scotch 3M
265
(700)
135
(75) 106
75
106
Scotch 3M
806
29.6
140
1440
(208) 294
208
294
Scotch 3M
807
29.6
140
1440
(208) 294
208
294
Scotch 3M
908
29.2
160
1440
(213) 300
213
300

example with Quantegy 499 (I did not put the intermediate calculations)

Flux max and Fluxi

Recording and tape head modeling attempt

the first simulations of the recording give the following results, some parameters are guessed and to be confirmed. I use a model with kinematics, the tape is a 50 µm ring that rotates anti-clockwise (you only see the top). The material is a "magnet" with the data of the manufacturer of the SM 911 (used in this tutorial) then of SM 900 & LPR 35

Head flux 01Head flux 02

the highest induction [T] in the band (at the location of the air gap) is higher than indicated above (0.15T) but when the material saturates, the induction increases further if H [ A/m] increases. In the head, it is weak ± 100 mT

References:

  • TEAC "A-3440 service manual"
  • MAGNETIC REFERENCE LABORATORY, INC Choosing and Using MRL "Calibration Tapes for Audio Tape Recorder Standardization"
  • Masanori Kimizuka "Historical Development of Magnetic Recording and Tape Recorder"
  • JRF Magnetic Sciences: "Tape Heads-An Introduction"
  • NAB MAGNETIC TAPE RECORDING AND REPRODUCING STANDARDS REEL-TO-REEL
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS "NAB Standard Cartridge tape recording & reproducing"
  • JOHN G. McKNIGHT "Speed, Pitch, and Timing Errors in Tape Recording and Reproducing"
  • ROBERT K. MORRISON FOUNDER STANDARD TAPE LABORATORY "STANDARD TAPE MANUAL"
  • IEC 60094-6 (1985) Magnetic tape sound recording and reproducing systems. Part 6: Reel to reel systems
  • SCOTCH Magnetic Tape "Sound Talk" vol1 #2 (1968)  High frequency bias requirements for magnetic tape recordings
  • HP (1967) rev1975 Magnetic tape recording handbook HP-AN-89
  • NASA (1982) ref 1075 Magnetic Tape Recording for the Eighties

DSC 5645 coco cut quarter

Be the first to post a comment about this tutorial

    Would you like to comment this tutorial?

    Log in
    Become a member