All user reviews of 3/5 for the Roland XV-5050

Rack presets featuring some of the Fantom S / AF, Adi regained some presets XV, which regained some presets them same JV ... Welcome to Roland ...
The rack comes with an editor I've ever ssay, my config is Hardware ...
There are SRX ports, 2 I believe j'me remember too much ... more
Standard connectivity, record, an optical output ...

USE

I have not found simple at all, but I knew not before Roland ...
So much so that I used that in Patch mode, because the non conviviality menus and the smallness of the screen me drunk ...
Ah Ah Ah Ah! (Bold laughter!), Manual, chui far from quick to understand in general but still ... c'tait worse than usual ...

SONORITS

There's good sounds, but there's nothing special, it's always the same waveforms between various Roland I ssay, which changes between machines is converters and effects, and those are the grand, better a 5080 XV.
The effects it's funny because I think it's a big problem on the rack, I do not know why but most patches are noys in invraissemblables reverbs, and it's really annoying to disable the go just for listen ... If this is the basic effects Roland, nothing to add ...
I had a preference for the guitars and I dtstais pianos and violins ...

NOTICE GLOBAL

I used 6 months, what I liked least is the screen, menus, effects.
What I liked most is some very good quality sound for the price I'd pay ...
I ssay the Triton LE / Studio / V2, Roland Fantom / S / FA / XA, E-MU Planett Phatt, a lot of apps ...
It's worth 400 euros, no more!
I do not have that choice, I would take a XV 5080, or 2080 bourr JV cards ...

Trs a wide range of sounds, some really good trs. In addition, we have the possibility to add the SRX cards extansions ...
At the moment I do not use the connector numrique, the analogue, which, contrary to some rumors, is correct (ms I admit to not require this level be trs l

UTILIZATION

A joke do you? This is the expander quatrime possde I (and I have not used the ones I possde), and even if the use that I was doing silent rather simple, the I'm really at a Chinese puzzle head.
User manual, even in English, is very simple. But it think it is another machine in question ...
In addition, many buggs (not too much MIDI information at the same time if that pile of mtal quickly lost) do not help.
With a computer, it becomes easier ... thankfully A condition (if using cubase for example) to have the text file ptit adquate (thank you Leibniz pr ca!). I am ms qd same trssvre because it is filled with some ystre running this thing ... However, it must be ready for 8 years I use expanders Roland ...

SOUNDS

The sounds are quite ralistes, thanks a surtt raction palette rponses the VLOC rich enough.
It says adj bcp t, ms it is true that some layers are also quite striking

OVERALL OPINION

What really makes me hallucinate is that my old sound modules, much cheaper work 1000 times better, with MIDI. When information such as "program change" + "score" for example, are too close to each other, and although the note is not played. It only made me Never again on my old machines.
GM bcl it. If you do not need it, it's therefore have a problem, ms, otherwise forget. I have the same out my little PMA5 (yes, it's not even a real expander is a squenceur pocket, which is incidentally GM expander).
Now, of that I regret my purchase, no. There is no choice in bcp expanders of this type of fawn all ...