QSC RMX 2450
QSC RMX 2450
  • Increase or decrease font size
  • Print
  • RSS

All user reviews for the QSC RMX 2450

  • Like
  • Tweet
  • Submit
Average Score:4.5( 4.5/5 based on 26 reviews )
 12 reviews46 %
 6 reviews23 %
 1 user review4 %
 1 user review4 %
Value For Money : Excellent

brikabrak's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" good"

QSC RMX 2450
We have 3 at work and I have two for several years, and no worries.
I have mounted in various institutions, and also, no problem.

Perfect for heads, but just for a few subs.
dj charle jean08/31/2011

dj charle jean's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" A monster!"

QSC RMX 2450
I use it for several months.

Yes Bravy a very low-end merdik!

Most: sound quality of course when I'm used to the sound merdik when there is a QSC RMX 2450 is the 518th's change believe me! warmer more péchut less garish! is setting behind the Pro Connection! In any case I can not do a clipper! button on the gain precise feel good the notches.

The less body weight is a flycase with the amp in over this, this, this and that it quickly becomes heavy! I even feel that it is heavier than the subwoofer yet there are only 45 kilos.

Considering the price that I pay I can say is that I am very pleased a good amp for the entry level.

I think Qsc is unstoppable and I intend to keep it a decade or so I remain faithful to the brand so yes!

ecce48's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" Poor !!!!!"

QSC RMX 2450
I bought it nine months ago. I use a good vieu United States in 1300 on the sub and I was told it would be nice to replace it even though it still works perfectly. I would not say disappointed!! Pushed too far into 4 ohms, it's heating, low equalized at nothing, that clip ... Finally, it was a bad plan and I reconnect the United States. Not letting me down, I try it on the media instead of the Mackie FRS 1700, it's just as well. On the same frequency I compare it to the crown MT 1200, still disappointed!! result would have been better to put some euros more (barely) to make a PLX.
That said and despite all the pain I have said, it's not a bad amp, I think the amp is versatile and will suit a excelence by many amateur ... But not for me, next time I will make my way to the PLX. It is worth its price but not more and more, the Mackie was a bit cheaper.

Ramaz's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" Very good amp. reliable, robust and cheap enough"

QSC RMX 2450
For how long have you been using it?

I use it all for 1 year battery. It comes out too often, 1-2 times per month.
Did you try many other models before getting this one?

I tried a few: I have a QSC Rmx1850HD also, I also owned the Stage Line, DAP and JB ...
I've just played in a company that amplifies its KIND and sub in for some top rmx2450 QSC (FCR art500).
What thing do you like most/least about it?

+: Price, quality sound output, design, ... IN CRE is missible
-: It takes so I always put the weight (20.2kg) and he sometimes fast clipper.
What is your opinion about the value for the price?

Simply brilliant!
Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice?

Yes without hesitation. I separated from my family just because he is not powerful enough for my boxes if I'd keep.
The amp is really good. Especially when I got it I did not have much experience with good brands but now I'm working on the Kind, QSC, Crown, etc, is something else.
They may say that it is the entry level of QSC I find this amp great. I also sell at cons heart.


watcha80's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

QSC RMX 2450

ppgc.location's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

QSC RMX 2450
I confirm was the top !! mine must have at moin 5 or 6 years, he has served outside toujour ds jpense worse condition and has a wrinkle pri pa pa .... heaters, clip pa pa beug, imortel ... a buy yeu closed <img class="smiley" src="https://fr.audiofanzine.com/images/audiofanzine/interface/smileys/icon_wink.gif" alt="wink" />
it turns on two subwoofer with franchemen made impressive.

Djetasvp's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

QSC RMX 2450
I use Ben Deou prs three years bought new 695 euros in France projector shop for those who might be interested that price.
I use them with my pair of speakers and it works nsx tr3 bton.bien my tr3 can suporte but hey more power to buy the same plx gnration must ante up first, but works pretty good the coallition well no worries.
I tried several models but need in. rflchir 50 years because the brand I wanted this but I admit some hesitation with a m inter m2000 because I possess an inter dja m m1000 and I did not know in. the promotion because of my QSC I saw more alantours of 1000 euros and I shut supra enjoyable when my supplier I shared this promo durable so I have no po hsit 50.
I recommend it as an amp of this size that price I say thank you QSC.
With the experience I would do as much without any hsitation except to buy a power or plx soft.NO JOKE OF COURSE I would be a waste of money. I will put 10 put j admits he is quite heavy but good as the rest of the stuff so it stays on FDMA wavelength.

merri-val's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

QSC RMX 2450
Superb amp, I use two 4050 and 2450 a 4 years since 1450
these amps have the PCHE, good quality sound and does not move even when clipe for hours (all without chauffle only problem is the weight of this set lorsq'il is in his fly.
trs good protection of the speakers (I had before the cler and the Sphynx, there's no photo)
trs good report quality price and good resale trs
With the exprience I take up some of this rmx especially for bass, but would take for the rest of pl2 (more lightweight, better sound quality, but many high)

Anonymous 's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

QSC RMX 2450
I possde 2 since 2000 with a short time leaving APRS (3 of MODELS era).
The bombs are certainly heavy but they never failed the task. They pousss the T252 for a few years. Aujoud'hui they are on a system Eminence. The next evolution of this Systmes should point me to a 5050 and I possde MX3000a is also a great ERRF them.
The report qualitprix and become super interressant over the years (my first when I 7500Frs same cost) but I've never regretted.
Some of potentiomtres problem that "spit" but a small mettoyage deep and it went away.
If not for the record, the first day served a growing medium from the bottom of KF850 in relief. And the surprise was the appointment. Ing of the facade there was seen the fire.
In short, if you prefer a bte to see more often.

Mooph's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

QSC RMX 2450
I use it for 8 months now.

+ Power reserve
Strength + components
- Weight? (Yeah, a powerful amplifier, weighs ca ... especially if it is solid;) )

The value is excellent. As already mentioned, for a similar quality, you have to buy the Crown or equivalent, and it is expensive! Attention to purchase only if there are speakers of similar quality to put on ...

I would do this choice certainly ... I also do it again if I may need and the means