Beyerdynamic M 201 TG
Beyerdynamic M 201 TG

M 201 TG, Dynamic Microphone from Beyerdynamic in the M series.

  • Increase or decrease font size
  • Print
  • RSS

All user reviews of 5/5 for the Beyerdynamic M 201 TG

  • Like
  • Tweet
  • Submit
Average Score:4.5( 4.5/5 based on 10 reviews )
 5 reviews50 %
 5 reviews50 %
Value For Money : Excellent
Not satisfied with those reviews?
View price information
Audiofanzine FR12/05/2008

Audiofanzine FR's review

Beyerdynamic M 201 TG
(Originally written by pitchoune/translated from Audiofanzine FR)
See manufacturer's features.


- How long have you been using it?

One year

- Which feature do you like the most / the least?

Ultra versatile, like a SM57 but much better!

It's the best mic I found for a rock or heavy metal snare.

Also great to record distortion and crunch guitars.

- Did you try any other models before buying it?

SM57, Beta 56, Audix I5, etc.

- How would you rate its value for money?

There is no big difference in price compared to a SM57.

- Based on your experience, would you buy this product again?

I own two. If I could I would buy a truckload of them!!! :-)

Anonymous 's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" the best in its category"

Beyerdynamic M 201 TG


I have 4 years

Yes I try not bad, but that price is the best

He buried the 57 hands down

pierre7's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" Among the very best dynamic!"

Beyerdynamic M 201 TG
Dynamic microphone all purpose (other than singing with the microphone in his hands).


Used for three months. I had many other dynamics (mid range).
I was astonished by the fidelity of voice restoration.

I used to sound with an altar in a church because he
is quite discreet and not brittle, and the sound coming out the speakers (of
Fostex studio monitors) was that of the speaker, without staining, we
only had the impression that he was closer.
I will not say it is more accurate than a good static, but I never
course also true dynamics.

I also like the strength, quality of making his (accurate) even remotely.
It can be used for almost anything.
on the other hand it is sensitive to manipulations, the output level is low and I
seems that other newer pickups are more resistant to feedback.

In the category of discrete dynamic microphones I have not found better,
value for money is very good (it is good 2 sm57!) and I think
buy a new one.


afrohair2004's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" Excellent dynamic"

Beyerdynamic M 201 TG
Dynamic Microphone small, but quite heavy for its size: a good sign! Supplied with clip and windscreen.


Used recently in the studio.
A snare: very good, punch, precision, placed at 8 or 9 inches from the drum.
Before a guitar amp: really excellent, heat, definition, balance, I think the EQ is downright useless for mixing; placed the center of HP, in the axis, 1 cm from the grid.

So far, by far, the best dynamic mic I've used.

Phil443's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Beyerdynamic M 201 TG
Dynamic mic super cardio-do everything. This microphone is the style mat and have me dpann an impressive time of scne as the studio. Prcis, balanced and warm are the adjectives that come first to dcrire this dinosaur, capable of getting out of some prs all situations.

Any robust evidence.


I have a pair since ... since?? I have natr with such a long history.

What I like most: Everything. What I like least: nothing.

From the moment we do not ask him to replace a large static recovery of voice in the studio or go pick a song of whales by 2000 meters below sea level in its scope, it is not micro- ckeller ... I put my 9 only because perfection is not of this world and that I would not be too swollen ankles ings / technicians in Beyer ...

Excellent qualitprix Whereas if you have the equivalent to nine, we must break the bank srieusement, while a remaining opportunities in TG 201 trs affordable. It's something that everyone should have, and if I had to do my purchase? I would take four, brand new ...