All user reviews of 5/5 for the Prodipe TT1 Lanen

What type of microphone? (Voice, sound, mixed ..)

It is a vocal microphone
What technology? (Electret, condenser ...)
See more below ples

NOTICE GLOBAL

How long have you use it?
10 months
What is the particular feature you like best and least?
Solid with good grip and ... SOUND

Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
Yes, I use all kinds of microphones on stage and in the studio for 18 years.
This mic is more directive than a Shure SM58 and less like the voice.
He may be accused of being a little plussensible the plosives, but he plays in the same court as the Shure.
Having Adi Sm and beta, I use it in complment for the singers on stage with unMC1 Prodipe for leads.
For connoisseurs, the difference between the tt1 and mc1 is the same between one sm and beta.

How do you report qualitprix?
It is stunning I have 35 pay destocking online.
Some retailers on Ebay offer lots tt1 prixcasss, may be good for groups.

With experience, you do again this choice? ...dropoff Window

Without hesitation, unless the MC-1 passes also 39! lol

Voice or singing karaoke.

OVERALL OPINION

I am not a specialist in micro, but I have another microphone which is twice trademark of tech that made me bought in a shop on Nancy touting the merits that this was the copy of SM58 and well TT1 Lanen is also good, more gain and an ON / OFF switch that I do not have the other. Perhaps slightly less well than the other as I have, but 2 times cheaper, all black, pleasant to touch.

For mobile DJs or karaoke, no need to put € 100 into a microphone, make a rather cheaper for 2

Value for money, perfect !!!

I'm not going back on the technical characteristics, it is a dynamic cardioid microphone, something like 58 sm.
I am guitarist in a blues-rock and I do the vocals on some tracks. I needed a proper mic, I read the reviews on the Prodipe TT1 Lanen and told myself that for the price I did not risk much.

OVERALL OPINION

I bought this mic on Cygnus Audiofanzine for € 25, the switch model. Regular use, weekly, and live again, he has a potato this mic is terrible! My singer has an AKG D5, very good mic, I would say a bit more defined than the TT1, but less fishing. He tried mine because at our last live performance, people thought my voice sounded better than his own mix.
He was amazed, I was immediately told that less tired voice, because no need to force, the only complaint and this is true it is more directional than the AKG, with TT1 must always sing well in front of the cellule.Mis aside this detail, nothing!
I have a friend who runs a small recording studio in his park he has SM58, SM57 and TT1 he uses for vocals by the lead voice for this he uses a tube microphone, but for remains carefree.
With a quality / price ratio like that we can only recommend this microphone for those seeking an easy mic that sounds right away, just not enough perspective on his life, we'll see.

Micro dynamic to the scene or taken for "draft" in the studio without having to leave the static sensitive with his cage and everything.
I use it for voice and beatboxing.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for several months. This is my first dynamic microphone. I really needed to have a small dynamic mic to record in all conditions, without breaking my head with my static (a m-audio luna which I am very pleased by the way).

What I love most is obviously the price (!) € 50 for a microphone that was done serious work. For cons, I can not tell its limits considering my use (working draft before making serious), and the fact that I have not tried yet on stage.

With experience, I will ever choose this without hesitation: I see it out over 50 € for a microphone that will use this. BUT ... if after testing on stage, I realize that in addition it provides, I revindrai change my opinion to put 10/10 everywhere!

I use this microphone to add sound and record the singer of my band.
We use it in rehearsal, recording and concert.
We are an amateur group, we are not super demanding, we want a versatile microphone that does not pose any problems and we seem to have a good sound.
We do not have neither the will nor the means to have an array of microphones.

This mic is great for us because it corresponds to our high standards.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 2 years since we tried it the other relegated only micro that we know, the SM58 in the closet.

Upon first use the singer was amazed by the result: a song that stands out and easily.
We also have fewer feedback problems with the SM58.
We are not experts in the sound and the sound system and it helps a lot.

What I like about this microphone is that it's simpler to have a good result.
I find the price / quality ratio excellent.
I do it again this choice easily.

cardioid dynamic vocal microphone

OVERALL OPINION

I use this mic for a little over six months, I wanted a microphone to dub my guitar amp but not the budjet for a 57 sm, I pulled on the advice of my dealer about this tt1.
microphone that has a good international practice.
value for money simply unbeatable for me.
I did recement the acquisition of a 57 sm and I realized I had spent € 70 too because I have a PA sysytem, ​​which holds the road and be very HOnet I do not find differences with the tt1, I used the same vocal mic (metal) and I left my 58 sm in his kit.

In summary, it must surely be better but for € 40 you do not prenezz the head, try you will not be disappointed mas.

microphone for singing or recovery instrument (sax, trumpet, accordion)

OVERALL OPINION

I have long worked with a black fire sennheizer 527 for singing and I could not do without it. I must say I was worried for his succession. I try Shure (SM58, BETA58) but the grain does not suit me Pasetti sennheizer an E840 which I found pretty good.
there are some less music store prodipe I entrust this to test, then at the price I have seen dpart one can laugh but when I used I found it much better than the shure and my opinion as well as my old black fire that I thought iremplacable.
So do not look at the price, made the test.
for me anyway it is very well, j'espre that age well, I think take a deuxime but the pro TT1 model (without interruption)
for once and found the good stuff at low prices do not hesitate

The Prodipe TT1 Ludovic Lanen microphone is, hands down, a fantastic microphone that was developed by the French audio company Prodipe. The goal of the Ludovic Lanen was simple: they wanted to create a good budget microphone that didn’t compromise on sound and did not feel at all cheap in any way. What they came up with was the TT1. This microphone has a typical frequency response from 50 Hz to the typical hand held dynamic 15,000 Hz, and has a cardioid polar pattern. So the specs are nothing particularly fancy. In fact, those two particular things are straight copies of the SM58, a microphone more than triple the cost of the Prodipe. What makes it special is the fact that the company Prodipe simply went through a bunch of Chinese capsules and found one that was both cheap and biased in a certain way to lend the microphone a certain flavor. What ends up happening with this microphone is that there is a peak in the low end and a bit of clean air at the top. This makes the microphone sound very unlike a typical stage microphone, because it is surprisingly detailed.

OVERALL OPINION

The incredibly special thing about this microphone is that it costs less than $30. This makes it possible to acquire many of them very quickly. In use, I have found that these are not great microphones when you put many of them on many voices, as the lower frequencies do tend to get a little bit bloated. However, these can be used on pretty much anything, with it having a wide pickup pattern and a very high level of gain. On guitar and toms it sounds unbelievably expensive, or example. So if you need a workhorse that an double as a fantastic vocal microphone for live and studio settings, look no further.

Micro singing, dynamic type, a bit old style point of view, but very nice metal, really sweet.

OVERALL OPINION

So here I go out of a test rather surprising, sm58 course, SM86, Audio Technica atm70, sm 58 beta, and prodipe tt1. Well, there's no picture, prodipe is what is the best, it's unbelievable. Its level, perhaps it is the audio technica a tad better, but we were four, one blind eye, and impossible to believe that the price différence.Je 39 euros, we did think that it could not be better .
I work in the studio with the neve, the Avalon and microphones prestige, all that to say that .... I can be a bit used. I'm on c.. The worst thing is that as a console on stage using a Yamaha LS9 ... and there for sure, we'll end up with two microphones is frankly balls ...... the case of the century. Now on the strength of the product, I can not say anything, I just hope they will in the coup.J forget, no hangs feedback, at least not more than with others.

- What kind of microphone?
Micro trs mixed but well suited to the voice speaks, confrence, its animation made for eq dj.



- What technology?
Low dynamic impdence, trs high output level (4 to 6 dB more than a SM57, SM58).
Very much like a Sennheiser 835, 935, 845 ....



OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?
1 day, but so that won ....

- What is the particular feature you like best,
His voice pr eq, trs dirrectement powerful as the rglerait with EQ. here no need to departure. a man's voice comes out good right now. a little loudness, trs hot, a bit high treble. You can always adjust ca APRS but saves time which is sometimes lacking, and an amateur who does not know chatters rgler console has a powerful sound facillement.

The capsule is a key force in the body of a rubber tube, Scary recess for handling noise but the system must be floating shure expensive produce. and ultimately it goes thanks to superb effect coating paint rubber. everything is mtal I can assure you. black copper grid.
Aspec it looks more like a Sennheiser 835, 845 has a shure and that's good.
Switch discreet and quiet.

A body which prevents curve to go hide the grid with his hands,



and more ..
mplats of the bottom that will prevent the microphone from rolling down on a table land.



The least
chippoter really for the price, very fine house and a little short to fit the clamp louse, but is against the microphone clip by REALLY toy, too soft, low-end plastic trs. Many inscriptions in white on the microphone but fortunately all the cot of the singer.






Plosives just pronounce all the same (high in the low eq) prvoir a Bonette.
A real hard drive conector Neutrik returned it.

- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?

I have a complte SERIES test and a bunch of microphones. the sm58 dpasss seem long, the beta 58 I was never convinced. akg only allowed me to have a voice at times beautiful, but in the range capacitor and therefore fragile.

I did that test again at home, but Saturday I take them in a small caf where it is difficult to trs sound (feedback, demand level for the size ..)
- How do you report qualitprix?
Simply UNBEATABLE. flawless except for the clip that should not be book as it reduces the microphone.

- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
No problem, I have two prices (the first 39 euro and the second 20 EUROS!
and 3 for a friend, same one was 39 euro and the other 2 to 20 euros. It compltement FOU.

I attached some pictures toujour enjoyable to see what we are talking about.
In my opinion, not neutral enough for the resumption of amps, but on some instrument is tested.

I put a 10 all the same price because there is as nothing of this quality. This micro "is" the price of a sm58 in ocas or before the prize amounts. Rest SEE LIFE. but the appearance can believe in a certain solids.

A microphone singing / talking lctrodynamique cardioid uni-directional.

Sensitive: -49 dBV / Pa (2.2 mV / Pa)
Rponse in frquence: 50-15KHz
Impdance output: 600 ohms 1 kHz, output level lev!

Comes with cover and clip.

OVERALL OPINION

I only used once for the moment, RPET.
I was using a MC1 of the same brand until I break it btement ...

I particulirement its coating, trs enjoyable but mostly useful to reduce noise when handled.
This mic is powerful, I put the volume less than half of what I usually put the MC1. The MC1 is more neutral. The TT1 is more pronounced bass and I got my totally change to my usual rglages on the table (much less bass and more treble). The plausives I was not as gn and I noticed a diffrence gross volume depending on how I positioned relative to the microphone to sing, what the MC1 Tolra better!. . No problem of feedback!

The microphone looks solid and the button "on / off", too, is reassuring. I prfre microphones that do not but can be useful for some or studio.

The cover is being protected trs beautiful but nothing. It can be amliorer putting foam on the wound micro and entering all the indoor stuff to.
The clamp is carrment gadget! We keep in case o ...

I have not tried so many microphones as a head but it takes some more expensive mics!

I have not tried to transplant my guitar amp, but I have seen on tests that trs dvissant correct in the grid and finding the best position.

The report is qualitprix phnomnal! Only Prodipe makes a.
Given the quality and price, I would do in this election but I am considering IMMEDIATE even when the future of a micro acqurir Audix OM7 attracts me a long time ...
But I do not regret this purchase and I advise the TT1! Do not rely on the price!