All user reviews of 4/5 for the Sennheiser e 609

Large diaphragm microphone designed special like for miking guitar amps. Compact design. Silver on the input side. Black on the audience side. I play loud rock guitar and I am very picky about the tone of my rig being accurately sent to FOH. I use some effects in my signal path and want them to make the trip out front too! Sound techs like 'em too!

Bought two of them at Piano's N Stuff in Blawnox, north of Pittsburgh. I think I picked them up for just under a $100.00 each since I was buying two.

<a href="https://www.nstuffmusic.com">https://www.nstuffmusic.com</a>

I use two combos in my live set up. Any two of the following: Marshall 5175, Fender Studio Lead. Tech 21 Trademark 60. Hughes and Kettner Attax 80 or Gallien Krueger Backline 100. You put the E609 in front of the speaker, close up and you are done. The sound of the rig comes out front, not the mike (yes, I'm talking to you Mr. SM57). I put relatively high SPL into these knuckleheaded looking mics with no breakup. That's good.

you can't polish a turd. If your tone blows this microphone will not cure it.

Well made mic by a good company. Both of mine have about a hundred gigs on them and two recording sessions. No complaints.

You will not break the bank on this mike and should be very happy with the results. I you are not satisfied, please keep the wonder whisk as our free gift.

This review was originally published on http://www.musicgearreview.com

Dynamic Microphone Designed for supercardiode transplanted guitar amp, but that can be used stuff mdium rich and low-mdium.
Note the hyper ct practice for the design of microphone that allows it to hang in front of the guitar cabinet for the transplant is an economy of a microphone stand and especially place!

OVERALL OPINION

I compare it to that j'utlise sm57 a long time. This E609 me more each time I put him sondier front of my amp, whereas with a 57 half the time I had a screaming his trs. I am buying a history know him a little better and actually it's a big slap.
In making a comparison, the 57 sounds a bit dirty but bright and full of attack, the E609 is much more rich and low-mdium mdium, I think it goes down much more serious as the sound is cleaner, softer. It seems more linear than the sm57 which seems a bit nasal ct but the effect of proximity and may be a little worse for low gr trs quickly become invasive which is a common problem on 57.
It is therefore trs complmentaire and diffrent of 57. At 57 I use the Submitted for everything solo, arpge, lightweight little riff and E609 for all that is rhythmic and application of the scale and precision throughout the spectrum, especially in the bass.
I think it must be percu trs good on toms or congas type of batteries as well.
It is not EMDU on vocals, m'enfin there are better, it works well trs to effect a "little dynamics could allo houston problem we have."

excellent dynamic microphone.
* Rugged metal body
Internal Suspension * Advanced Design
* Directivity Supercardioid
* Compensating coil anti-snoring


OVERALL OPINION

I use it (4 years) exclusively for the resumption of my amp and timbre of the snare. But it can be very versatile ... also for brass instruments (trumpet and horn).
I find it responds extremely well and accurately reproduces the original sound (my ears)! attention to the placement anyway!
I could look at Shure SM57 Rode NT1 (guitar amp and snare) well but for the price does not happen at the ankle.

For examples:
https://fr.audiofanzine.com/homestudio/forums/t.424376 the-Sound-of-your-home-studio.html
https://fr.audiofanzine.com/homestudio/forums/t.424376 the-Sound-of-your-home-studio post.6263886.html