VH-12 classified ad
Alerte nouvelle annonceImages
Reviews
4.5/5(2 reviews)
50 %
50 %
Write a user review
BuBuOnePublished on 01/23/09 at 15:19 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Finally an opinion on the pad
I use it for about a year. Previously I was playing on a TD-3 module with the CY-5. I will not give you the insult to compare the two, so I prefer to compare the rendering of a real charlest: this is expected to be in an amount of a VH-12 TD-20.
So in general: it is not bad at all! There is a sensor that detects the pressure between the two plates, and one course in typing.
The charlest is well managed, but I find that there is a flaw in shades of openness. Indeed, the move charlest lot when struck while it is semi-open, and this causes differences in the detection of the opening level. Therefore play regularly in open and semi-open is much harder...…
I use it for about a year. Previously I was playing on a TD-3 module with the CY-5. I will not give you the insult to compare the two, so I prefer to compare the rendering of a real charlest: this is expected to be in an amount of a VH-12 TD-20.
So in general: it is not bad at all! There is a sensor that detects the pressure between the two plates, and one course in typing.
The charlest is well managed, but I find that there is a flaw in shades of openness. Indeed, the move charlest lot when struck while it is semi-open, and this causes differences in the detection of the opening level. Therefore play regularly in open and semi-open is much harder...…
Read more
Finally an opinion on the pad
I use it for about a year. Previously I was playing on a TD-3 module with the CY-5. I will not give you the insult to compare the two, so I prefer to compare the rendering of a real charlest: this is expected to be in an amount of a VH-12 TD-20.
So in general: it is not bad at all! There is a sensor that detects the pressure between the two plates, and one course in typing.
The charlest is well managed, but I find that there is a flaw in shades of openness. Indeed, the move charlest lot when struck while it is semi-open, and this causes differences in the detection of the opening level. Therefore play regularly in open and semi-open is much harder than on a real charlest. Once we found the right position, it stays there, but as we had not found the sound is approximate.
To address this, I wanted to secure the plates more rigid, to be under the effect of oscillation. But if it is feasible for the top plate, the bottom one problem: it is mostly held by two plastic straps, which I do not find a rock-solid. I'm still looking how to improve rigidity, if anyone has any tips thank you to send them to me!
The price / quality ratio is hard to say. Roland is the best material to date, so if you want something that looks realistic, is for you. If however you are looking for efficiency and better quality / price ratio, I suggest you also consider the purchase of the VH-11, which seems to have less of a problem of oscillation.
I use it for about a year. Previously I was playing on a TD-3 module with the CY-5. I will not give you the insult to compare the two, so I prefer to compare the rendering of a real charlest: this is expected to be in an amount of a VH-12 TD-20.
So in general: it is not bad at all! There is a sensor that detects the pressure between the two plates, and one course in typing.
The charlest is well managed, but I find that there is a flaw in shades of openness. Indeed, the move charlest lot when struck while it is semi-open, and this causes differences in the detection of the opening level. Therefore play regularly in open and semi-open is much harder than on a real charlest. Once we found the right position, it stays there, but as we had not found the sound is approximate.
To address this, I wanted to secure the plates more rigid, to be under the effect of oscillation. But if it is feasible for the top plate, the bottom one problem: it is mostly held by two plastic straps, which I do not find a rock-solid. I'm still looking how to improve rigidity, if anyone has any tips thank you to send them to me!
The price / quality ratio is hard to say. Roland is the best material to date, so if you want something that looks realistic, is for you. If however you are looking for efficiency and better quality / price ratio, I suggest you also consider the purchase of the VH-11, which seems to have less of a problem of oscillation.
See less
20
»
alcoolsPublished on 09/24/09 at 04:50 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
I had a VH-11 (on a TD12) and I now have a VH-12 (a + TD20 TDW20). I just wanted to give an opinion contradictory to the previous opinion: Personally, I find that the VH-12 is just as easy to play (at opening) as the VH-11. And above all, it seems more natural (except the noise "plop" of coutchouc associated with the printing of the material where indolence is closed hihat).
20
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Roland
- Model: VH-12
- Category: Electronic Drum Pads
- Added in our database on: 09/16/2008
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Other categories in Electronic Drums & Percussion
Other names: vh 12, vh12