All user reviews of 2/5 for the Electro-Harmonix Little Big Muff Pi XO

Use
Characteristic
Its
Manufacturing
Average rating


Happy to receive it, I tested the pedal on my new "Bugera V22" tube, fan of the 70s, seeing thomann references to Pink Floyd and Santana, I think it goes ..... ensure short, trying a lot of different settings, the sound does not suit me at all, that is very rough and hard to get her to take a rhythmic own thomann for solos, it's a little nicer but without breaking bricks short, I returned the Little Big Muff and probably choose the DS1 Boss, I'm still happy to know the differences between the two Big Muff??? IP USAet the Little Big Muff standard 53 EUR

UTILIZATION

The general configuration is simple but accurate for trimmings, it thickens ....

SOUND QUALITY

I find the sound very rough, short, not for me, I tested on my strat U.S. 2012 or with my Charvel CH.1 a Bugera amp tube V.22 and frankly, I'm super disappointed when we refers to Santana or Pink Floyd, I'm kidding, this should not be the models there???

OVERALL OPINION

It's simple, I purchased from Thomann ago and I returned a week later, the price is very correct but value for money, ie some quality but c ' my taste is personal, I had to try several beautiful trimmings, I 've not been able to have his drinking ... I tried one, fortunately, since I have found what I was looking for a sound of hell (for me) CoolDrive Artec pedal, you can listen on YouTube, it sounds serious ....

Description already available. I want to emphasize that like all EHX pedals recent nano (holy grail, freeze, etc. ..) the species of aluminum alloy, although strong, is nowhere near the feeling of strength and quality offered by boss pedals, TC electronics or MXR. This is a personal opinion and the price is not the same, but you know ...

UTILIZATION

Setup could not be more simple and standard volume, tone and gain. After, each to refine their sound by playing with the settings

SOUND QUALITY

Like any self-respecting big muff, it sends the fat and could cover the sound of a chainsaw with the gain at 3. I cons by two separate opinions on the quality of the beast:

- One ear objective, the pedal is a good quality / price ratio. The fuzz is pretty good quality and done the job for both large gulps rhythmic serious jack to the white or black keys, for solos with the sustain fairly consistent even with a strat. It gives a real shot gouache has single coil pickups. For this price, it was basically a choice between a boss DS1 and a little big muff, the two are trying because they do not use the same but the investment is worth it.

- A suggestive ear, I also has a russian big muff, because without boring 9v jack. I Éclusé all youtube videos and read a lot of opinions, and I had the sensation that the sound was not as good on the little. I thought I was a bit autistic and threw myself anyway.
I can confirm that the sound has NOTHING to do, say you found the mind, but it's not going away. Where BM Russia would spend my strat for a bulldozer, filled with serious but very well defined and does not drown provided the higher notes, the LBM in comparison is a real boiled compress it to death, but in the negative sense, ie big loss of momentum and total drowning in low flowing completely his agreement. The difference is less felt on the other hand on solos.

Where I can not help but display a goofy smile when I let off steam on the intro Cherub Rock Smashing BM with my Russian, I honestly thought I was going to cry after experimented with LBM ...

OVERALL OPINION

My overall opinion is average. I think a non-owner of Big Muff should be satisfied with the LBM. For those who know the "standard" of this gem and hope to find it in this pedal, flee .. I would recommend, given the price difference, opt for the standard Big Muff certainly pervasive, but that sounds.

22/08/11: Nothing transcends add this chapter. The small size is sympathique.8/10

UTILIZATION

22/08/11: RAS (analog pedal without menu inexitant manual, 3 portards to turn the basic ... in basic) - 7/10

SOUND QUALITY

22/08/11: Ouch, that's where it gets tough! ... The sound quality ... View my opinion global.Sinon, I try to use it with either simple (Fender Custom Shop 69 Tele and MIK) or double (Kit of Langcaster Humbuckers). Or in one case or the other I do not remember what I was expecting. Explanation below:
2/10

OVERALL OPINION

22/08/11: In 1977, I had been offered a U.S. Big Muff. Like a triple fool, I lost in a move that I made myself (I'm never recovered). I remember a very cumbersome pedal, but with its insane, so organic.
Fell on the Little Big Muff Reissue with its pocket size, I plunged. Result, I cry more than before the disappearance of my Muff 77. It is light years ahead of the original. It is simple, it is absolutely not the same product, and the effect is, in my eyes (well, my ears) simply sucks.
It fuzz cold (I almost wrote "digital"), where 77 fuzzait warm sustain it a little, where 77 sustainait to death, it compresses madness, where 77 would compress more intelligent or reasoned, and especially the distortion product as a turning signal, a kind of oscillation which, in addition, the effect prématurément.J breath, I put it first on account of the stack. At the same time, the consolidated stack of 77 was ridiculous, so why the news boufferait more? But anyway, stripped of its battery and plugged into my PSU Powerplant is the same story.
This is clearly a purchase that I regret, and has the big drawback to heighten my remorse for having lost my jewel of the time. 3/10