Price engine
Classified Ads
  • Increase or decrease font size
  • Print
  • RSS

All user reviews of 3/5 for the RODE NT2

  • Like
  • Tweet
  • Submit
Average Score:4.1( 4.1/5 based on 24 reviews )
 10 reviews42 %
 9 reviews38 %
 3 reviews13 %
 2 reviews8 %

Lagalo's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" Drle a micro ..."

I do not m'tends on CHARACTERISTICS. Enough said.
Over time, I use a little for anything and everything, for curiosities. Dernirement for taking a Little Martin, of low, given aa sound a bit old trs fun. For voice, this is the explanation of my title. I recorded a 5 track EP rcemment: same singer, same rglages, same location. Finally, a coup is a coup was wrong! This is not original, since he knows there is no micro IDAL.
True, he does not like whistling but is there a microphone who love them? There is much talk of his "bump" ... I will speak plutt troughs. I found it a trend "encaverner" the voice!


I use it for 6 years. (I do not know truth) This is my one large chart and as I did not put in a Euro 2000 Neuman, I privilgie from the dynamics (including EV pramp TLA) that I find more alive. But I do not spare it surprises me sometimes (see above). No concern for solidity either. The ratio Q / P is (n'tait) no top. But now 150 euros secondhand (if in good condition Obviously) is a good deal to address this type of microphone.
laszlo garibaldi01/22/2008

laszlo garibaldi's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

It is a condenser microphone, I use it for vocals on my workplace, a neighborhood mostly studio turned to rap.


it's been a year since I listen to every day performance of this microphone, I find his hump in the upper medium rather unpleasant and sometimes unpleasant, overall it's not horrible, but it is far from great, as long as the preamp is of poor quality and it's the end of the beans ... I find it does not go to all voices, especially male voices acute, however it seems to take the shock strength level ... but anyway there is no miracle malmheureusement for high-end, it is filled in, but for models in the home studio that's enough!

Dryfe's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Previous DEFINITIONS-see


- I use it for two years in a home studio environment, to catch my voice, and decision-guitar.
With a tube-Pr on which I ran several lights.
Depending on the lights, it's going to so and so frankly quite, empty.
And I record with a 0404 base Emu.

- I got it for cheap the era: 150

- I have tried other micro before, but I can not really compare because these tests were not performed on my config 'today.

- APRS two years:
The capsule cash bad pop and breath, it is moisture sensitive trs and found several significant loss of gain after the catch proximity.
It is a micro fragile.
It pnible to wait twenty minutes before making a decision.
In short, I think he is no longer state of perfect market, the mutt.
-For recording scratch it is very well against by

- I do not see it as a dsagrable the cost.
It is true that low privilgie mdiums.
Its use to beginners, I reworked systmatiquement its legalization, but a "no investment" allows me to avoid this manipulation ':
I attack the decision-voice m'excentrant lgrement and the four is rquilibre.

All my Premire DMOS have recorded with the t i, and Repass derrire ing is my catch, much more than the expression found its silent right same.
trs good.

Since it m'enquiquine often, I'll paste an average score ui l.
I believe in other home stduio microphones least chrs that sounded just as good or better as the studio project B1.
Shape with the same budget, I would do not the same choice.