• Increase or decrease font size
  • Print
  • RSS

All user reviews of 5/5 for the RODE NT2A

  • Like
  • Tweet
  • Submit
Average Score:4.4( 4.4/5 based on 15 reviews )
 8 reviews53 %
 4 reviews27 %
 2 reviews13 %
Value For Money : Excellent
Buy at Sweetwater

melou2003's review" Impeccable in lots of different configurations"

A very heavy condenser mic that inspires confidence. I bought it knowing I should pare it with a sturdy mic stand.


I used it essentially to record vocals, since I already had an NT55 for my guitar. After several trials, various positioning changes, equalization, compression, I found I actually preferred the NT2A for my guitar (instead of the NT55). I plugged it, placed it about a meter in front of the guitar, slightly offset to the left of the guitar's sound whole, and it worked great. I hardly touched the EQ, and only did so to dig a little medium heat hum sound.
So for those looking for a microphone a little off-road, it will be a good choice

Here is an example of a picture taken of his guitar, almost nothing in treatment if not a TC Native Reverb, a limit on the master


kierel's review"WTF!!"

"Vintage" studio mic, both in terms of sound and design!


After having looked for THE mic for a long time, including lots of comparative tests (neumann, shure, seinnheisser, akg, etc), I gave a try to this rather classic-looking studio mic. As soon as I had it in my hands I felt reassured by its weight (so watch out for the boom stands), it's not a plastic mic! I plugged it into my small H4 to make some tests and boy was I surprised: an awesome "vintage" sound! With an H4! I checked the settings on the zoom and realized everything was flat! I asked if I could test it with an avid system (which was displayed at the store) and I wasn't the only one in shock! This mic has an excellent sound quality (if you like vintage sounds), worthy of better-known products. When I asked the price I was dumbfounded! I thought it would be around $500-$600 and it was only $380 with shock-mount suspension and (removable) anti-pop filter! The store must have gone out of stock with the dozen clients that were in that day! It certainly won't oust a U87, but at this price, it's unbeatable!

hhub17's review"All-purpose, good performing mic"

Very versatile, due to the polar patterns available (omni, cardioid, figure 8) and low-pass, as well as pad: You can record percussion vocals, piano and everything else you want, with the only condition that you need to have some time to test the settings: 3 polar patterns x 3 filters x 3 pads = 27 possibilities.
Large-diaphragm, condenser mic, which means it needs 42V phantom power.
To make yourself an idea, you can make simulations at Rode's website: You need to send a recording made with another indexed mic and then listen what it would sound like with the NT-2A and these or those settings. Nice and interesting, but you should always take the results with a pinch of salt — it's their site. They also have pedagogical videos regarding the capturing of sound.
I have no shock mount, only a standard screw-on clip but the low-pass filters out lots of annoying rumble from the ground. It's practical and improves the recording, while also reducing the need for digital processing afterwards, like using a digital filter after digitization.


I have it since 2006 and I didn't test anything before: There was simply nothing comparable at this price point back then, I think. And I still think the same today.
I use it with an MC200 Behringer preamp, and it sounds pretty good (even if I think the tube must be changed), or with a Toneport UX2 when it is in the mood for working, or even with my small Alesis USB mixer. It comes out clean and clear out of all of them, without any shrill, but you obviously need high-end hardware to get the best out of it.
The pros: It is not only versatile, it is good and not expensive. It's even a bit too good: You can clearly hear the noises from the computer and even the fridge in the room next door. I'll have to isolate better my studio.
The cons: I got mad when I saw that it is now sold with a shock mount for the same price. And you must also be careful with mic stands that are too light, since the mic has a considerable weight. I don't know if it's fragile, I have always taken good care of it.
In hindsight, I'd buy it with the whole kit rather than having to settle for the mic clip.

LRStudio's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)" Excellent value for money"

Large-diaphragm condenser microphone (requires phantom power)

Pre-designed for voice, but also excel in other situations

3 polar
attenuation 0, -5,-10db
low cut 40, 80hertz

See datasheet


I have not had large enough static membrane to make the best possible comparison, but I have heard recordings made with a number of static, and I honestly think he is doing well for its price, even compared to the Neumann!

The sound is clear, straight, powerful, has great presence and is relatively neutral (I mean, there are no holes in the passband). It integrates a priori very well in a mix.

The proximity effect (severe reinforced) is quite far, the pop filter is required within 50 cm. Besides the bundle version is very nice, support anti vibration and pop filter on the same piece, it's great!

On the grave of a djembe, bass clean and defined sound perfect.

A snare: you forget, in my test: zero punch

On an acoustic guitar is clean, but lacks some precision, because of the low reactivity transients. If you do buy one microphone to catch live or re-recording, it is still relatively versatile, thanks to its directivity, and can therefore be a good solution.

The directional precisely, are quite effective, even if I did not notice much difference between "8" and "Omni" (not tested too much to be said, since I only needed the "heart").

No breath, one of the quietest mics, market, noise from my PC (very quiet in real life, housing Fractal Design R3, about 25db) is much higher than the breath of the microphone.

Obviously, product prices tight, no briefcase, just a protective cover standard is already something, but you take care of the microphone carrying case!

Verdict: 5 / 5, recommended, value for money excellent!

RaphRaymond's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

I'm going to go fast on this part, the Rode site is well done. It is a large diaphragm microphone with three electrostatic directionality (Cardio, Omni and Bi), two cups low (40 and 80Hz) and two attnuations (-5 and -10 dB).
It comes in a cardboard box with a small kit and a simple clamp trs. I have benefitted from a suspension gives the elastic o SM-2 provided silent so I did not even dballe the clamp. (And if the store but for the mk-319 because it also fits the SM-2!)
The knobs are on the front of the microphone is not trs trs Aesthetics, but very practical as they were before the eyes ... (Albeit anti-pop ...)
Trs low noise, output level comfortable plutt medium-high is a microphone sensitive enough.
Caution is trs heavy prvoyez a good start with a good counterweight (or foot without pole).


While the sound ... (I use a mk1 Goldmike, pramp lamp plutt prcis trs and transparent, it is obvious that the characters can change depending on pramp is used).
Obviously the 3-position ring of Manir quite Different. Personally I do not like the bi-directional, the sound lacks a bit of air, space, and it is trs nose (quite dsagrable development of the band 800-1kHz). I do not use it I do not speak.

In Cardio dj is much better. A diffrent distances the sound is always clear and Retailer. As you approach the microphone, the effect of proximity is very well gr and we will not need to break the overflow serious like crazy. The mdium trs is enjoyable, there is the body but is late. This is not a microphone to make voice raw feeding. The extreme acute plutt is highlighted but it shines with great gentleness and finesse also, it will not rise above the frquences 7kHz to mix because it gives micro really not bad, but we are not obliged to decline because they are pretty. There are between 2kHz and 5kHz that sound can be a bit "dr" according to sources and the proximity of it. Cel said nothing excessive, I myself even a voice so nasal and mtallique high enough, but I do not need to fall more than 2 dB EQ, and even while dpend catch the musical context ... (But if your a girl you have a nasal voice and your pramps are slamming trs / gloss, it may become aggressive). Please note I did not say that it was inappropriate to vote fminine, on the contrary it may be by the fineness and lgret he excels, the men could missing a little bit of low-mdium warm as that of NT2A plutt neutral or even a little cold.
In short, we must think of it as a microphone 250 to 300 it will not be perfect!

In omni microphone becomes neutral trs. Sr Although there is no effect but the proximity of small agressivit mdium also disappeared leaving a softer and finer the image of the extreme treble. It can sing without the microphone derrire concern (the sound is really a little less Retailer I doubt that being aware in a mix) but not on CTSO the we lose too much top-mdium and acute. In this directivity normment it lends itself to anything and can go anywhere you need a jack o soft, shiny and plutt ar.

Given its price I think it's a good micro trs caractriserais soon as I "prcis, plutt neutral or bright." It is a ready-made micro compltementaire my mk-319 which is a bit poor but bright possde just a grain trs pretty warm, intimate, almost sensual ...
Over time I think I would take a deuxime NT2A to a pair of omni classical training and resume (quartet, choir etc ...) I am satisfied with trs trs but beware does not the torque of gear that could make the sound a bit harsh.

At this price, and three directional possdant there that day, and I know that the C-3 of studio projects that I could not test it would be interresting to compare!

gorden's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Micro comes with multi fixing micro in a small house black.
average price 226 euros
cardio, omni, fig8
Low cut
Made in Australia


I use it for 3 months (harpsichord, guitar, vocals ....)
I am satisfied with its rendering in the bass and treble
it's really a pleasure to work with a microphone of this type.

I plan to buy 3 more!

prosonix.be's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Large diaphragm condenser microphone with 1 "Diameter inch (2.5 mm)
(Which means he has an eardrum 5x larger than the VTRE.)

- It is adjustable directivity (cardioid, omnidirectional or Figure 8)
- High Pass Filter (Flat, 40Hz, 80Hz)
- Attnuateur selectable (Flat,-5dB,-10dB)
- Beach trs frequency drives complte 20Hz - 20000Hz
- Maximum pressure 147dB
- The elastic suspension and the tui is provided which is not the case of some brands.


I use it for 8 months
I find trs flexible thanks to its ability rglages trs is a good mic that can do almost anything.
I saw my mtier quite familiar with the studio microphones. So I tried many before this one

The report quality price of this mic is its best qualitbr />
I would do without this choice hsiter!

Aktivist's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

CF description ...
It has the defect of its qualities, namely that it is going anywhere with the settings directivity, gain and mounted filters. But that handicaps can be a bit (note that I have not done comparative tests) in terms of rendering compared to static tenors ultras specialist has only one directional ...


I use it for over a year, I made all kinds of face, in environments more or less suitable, and he did well every time ...
Settings arranged to adapt the microphone to the conditions and requirements of the outlet, is perfect when there is not a big fleet of microphones on hand ...
Excellent value for money in terms of robustness and reliability of Rode mics ...
I referrer choice without hesitation, and in general, rode mics are a great alternative to high-end microphones and have a build quality and sound reproduction is far superior to all entry-level products ( Chinese mic etc. ..)