Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Jackson Pro Randy Rhoads RR3 (Before 2006) reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Jackson Pro Randy Rhoads RR3 (Before 2006)
Images
1/41
Jackson Pro Randy Rhoads RR3 (Before 2006)

V/XPL/FB Shaped Guitar from Jackson belonging to the Pro series

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
KyrieLeeXIII KyrieLeeXIII
Published on 11/03/07 at 12:28
Pro model japan
22 jumbo frets
microphones H / H Seymour Duncan TB4 (bridge) SH-2 (sleeve)
Floyd Rose Licensed
3 knobs (2 volume 1 tone) a 3-way selector
handle vissbr />
Score: 5, 22 for freight (no ass for a solo in my opinion) the licensed floyd specially not reliable when it comes to save the tuning and Bolt (that trs heavy in the treble that even when feasible)

UTILIZATION

Overall the handle is comfortable / fast freight although more or less on trend poses you rcurer the thumb of the indoor moderately enjoyable way>: <(

Access in acute is more or less suitable dpendant matrise your instrument in the execution of technical solos, pure shred of anything is a neck-and possibly screwed way ibanez rg . The personal, the heel makes me srieusement the head>

lgre the rr3 is like a feather, level ergonomics unlike ides received it is much easier to play sitting (a horse on one thigh) and standing in the latter case because she got a serious tendency to pitch nose, not excessively, but when even

get a good sound of the still dpend derrire stuff you have, but overall with microphones origins and basic transistor amplifier gives a big fat sound and thundering on versatility.

Score: 4, I will change is not for nothing

SOUNDS

I play any style of metal and it is true that Randy Rhoads is almost the ultimate metal guitar, the Randy Rhoads yes, not specially rr3 not. I recommend the above range ...

I changed the original microphone config H / H for the EMG 81 (bridge) and I must say that I did well: ca m'vitera to repeat the same mistake I lost all hihi versatility (0 absolute versatility) and the time I need to find a t rglage multiply by ... long for rsultat not forcment mieu than that obtained with the microphones origins dcidment trs good. (Be able to sustain mieu also: /)

NOTE: 8, 8 even when I put becaufe even if I am not satisfied with the MOI mdifs I even bring the big sound that chih mom is not a myth associated Randy Rhoads was the error, if you play only the metal in any case: it is a pure killing that will bring a sound and solid edge (the palm muting is joussif scratches on this) even RACORD a transistor amplifier 3 watts =]

OVERALL OPINION

I use the guitar as main rr3 for over a year, when Cal j'crit is a horse in my arms on my thigh and I must say that it hurts me to tell you that she has only weeks to live (at home anyway) before being replaced (by a LTD KH-602)

I am sad, because it really is a guitar that I love for its looks (I vnre and I'll miss the point that I can tell you that I buy some another rr later) and a big sound that never fails in more than one year of good and loyal service.

However, it has flaws which I can not m'accomod (the 22 boxes, the handle screwed on licensed floyd is a monumental crap ...)

With the experience I would do the same no choice, but it's a bit easy to say because my game has absolutely impresionante evolve since I bought it.

In the era with my level of false beginners / intermediate this guitar a silent gem that share prices will please report any quality apprentices metalheads who want to have a scratch of the mouth and sends ... APRS I would advise apprentices satriani another guitar or a model of the range gear-board suprieur with more reliable and a better finish.

NOTE: I can not give an overall score is something that is priceless lol (I learned all about this guitar so ...) but if I really had no choice I would have put 5; )