Behringer UltraVoice VX2000
+
Behringer UltraVoice VX2000

UltraVoice VX2000, Other Studio Effect from Behringer.

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
  • Increase or decrease font size
  • Print
  • RSS

All user reviews of 1/5 for the Behringer UltraVoice VX2000

  • Like
  • Tweet
  • Submit
Average Score:3.0( 3/5 based on 6 reviews )
 3 reviews50 %
 1 user review17 %
 2 reviews33 %
Value For Money : Excellent
Not satisfied with those reviews?Request a new review
bidule100008/12/2003

bidule1000's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Behringer UltraVoice VX2000
Analog preamp

UTILIZATION

It is in the use and settings that things get complicated. The connection is simple: XLR or jack. Outwardly this preamp has a very pro with air (too) many of knobs and LED. For your long winter evenings, you are entitled in addition to the power cable with a thick manual 3 pages (in french), taking in a "botched" the various parts of the device.

1st part: "vintage discrete input"

48-volt power supply: no problems
-Phase inverter: ok
-Gain input (-12 to +12 dB): do not climb above 0 dB under penalty of having a very ugly breath
- Lo-cut: honestly I wondered if it was not broken because it does not cut much and even adds a lot of breath.

Part 2: "expander" good expander are very expensive and if it really is not any good

3 ° part: "tube emulation": if you've never heard a sound warm with a real tube amp, you will find the result amusing, but it warms nothing!

Part 4: "opto compressor"

For what the deal is pro compressor efficient enough for the price, the compression module has very little use.

5 ° part: "voice optimized EQ"

still need a specialized device that gives her a nice taste of cardboard!

Part 6: "esser opto" without comment

SOUND QUALITY

As for the sound itself, I wish I had one of the engineers from behringer to know what he wanted to do with this unit! The only functions that I use on this unit are: 48 V phantom power and phase reverse. Everything else is turned off.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for almost a year (and I am the proud owner of three of these charming devices) and I admit I wanted to throw in the beginning. By using it to feed my condenser mics, it works perfectly well but do not ask him more. A remake for the price I would go faster for "presonus tube pre" cheaper and far more efficient.
Doyeuxyvan01/24/2003

Doyeuxyvan's review (This content has been automatically translated from French)

Behringer UltraVoice VX2000
Preamp + lots of gadgets that should have not to be for a better quality preamp.

UTILIZATION

A little original but understandable.

SOUND QUALITY

Awful, when the LED lights on a GIS means a "pop" in the sound. Not at work!
The main purpose of this preamp preamplifier is, but it really hurts!
Behringer What a mistake!
Here is how to lose customers! I think this preamp ravirais me for the price if there was not his pops. Behringer's too late! Like Thomson, I banish this mark on future purchases (well, we'll see ...).

The preamp is the Behringer Shark DSP as well (without the pops) and cheaper! (For cons can not adjust the level of output).

I use a dynamic mic and I have to have the preamp gain fairly high so his pops agree too! In my opinion with a condenser microphone can not hear it!
But it's too late, when in doubt, buy a simple preamp for 150 euros and qq.
Well at least it preamplifier.

OVERALL OPINION

If you do not have ears, you take it for home studio use, it's awful! For the live true that c is less demanding, but a product as bad should not exist!