View other reviews for this product:
tomdes « But well »
Published on 10/25/12 at 14:47This is a copy of one of my posts in the forum:
"Hello all,
I wanted to share with you my impressions of the controller and the novation automap.
I'm on the forum because I know that people sometimes post netting.
I'll post as the opinion section.
I find the concept really super good.
There are thousands of midi controllers on the market and innovations are for me the only one worth it.
I had just about every and each time I was disappointed by either the quality of manufacture (eternally plastic) side and oriented "live".
In fact most are made for the live, on uc-33 for example (everyone uses while it is horrible) with Ableton live, we make an apple + M and assigns almost everything what we want.
But the studio to share the mackie control (for once only studio oriented and overpriced) there is not much.
Both meet the innovations and it is very good.
It is very good but of course it does not work that well, it would be too good.
I recall that I have the first version but since the firmware is the same as the new one, I guess the machines are identical.
- The first problem is the lack of space between the knobs.
I imagine that it is important that the controller is transportable and must go to the economy but it is really tight. Handling live knobs can be quite frank, there I am obliged to turn the fingertips.
Why have not deleted the edit buttons in the center? This is a usb machinery which is mainly used with a computer (which does not have a computer today?), One would have imagined that the editing controller parameters is done through software innovation.
- Then there is the recovery value of cc by different controls.
The knobs are supposed infinite avoided jump values, it works pretty well but we need to turn the knob a few degrees before starting to change a setting.
I do not speak but not normal knobs.
- The automap is really the big advantage of this controller, it is finally the voice of a universal machine. By mark against my daw is not always the controller.
I sometimes have to reboot several times before the controller is detected.
It often touches crisis nerds.
The automatic mapping is not hyper point either. It would have been quite a few together some basic function in the same places that the user have pins.
Kind for synth + cutoff + resonance envelope in the same places.
- The pads are MUCH too hard! The mpc it tells you something?
- Finally, it concerns the new version: But why did you delete the second screen???
Why go back???
Again I find this system very hyper automap, I accommodated all its flaws, and again after all the templates I am getting returned and I know the tricks to make it work properly.
But what I find distressing is that innovation is close to the perfect product for those who make the computer music. Vst to control its universally and separate from this damn mouse.
But there is still ....
If you have any other comments similar it would be nice to share them here.
These people have included in innovation.
I look forward to the v3 controller.
I imagine that it is expensive to develop the perfect product, and that sells more when the price is low, but why the world is abandoned noon? Why not make a line "public" and line "upscale", as speakers, mixer etc. ...
Gentlemen in innovations help us please. "
"Hello all,
I wanted to share with you my impressions of the controller and the novation automap.
I'm on the forum because I know that people sometimes post netting.
I'll post as the opinion section.
I find the concept really super good.
There are thousands of midi controllers on the market and innovations are for me the only one worth it.
I had just about every and each time I was disappointed by either the quality of manufacture (eternally plastic) side and oriented "live".
In fact most are made for the live, on uc-33 for example (everyone uses while it is horrible) with Ableton live, we make an apple + M and assigns almost everything what we want.
But the studio to share the mackie control (for once only studio oriented and overpriced) there is not much.
Both meet the innovations and it is very good.
It is very good but of course it does not work that well, it would be too good.
I recall that I have the first version but since the firmware is the same as the new one, I guess the machines are identical.
- The first problem is the lack of space between the knobs.
I imagine that it is important that the controller is transportable and must go to the economy but it is really tight. Handling live knobs can be quite frank, there I am obliged to turn the fingertips.
Why have not deleted the edit buttons in the center? This is a usb machinery which is mainly used with a computer (which does not have a computer today?), One would have imagined that the editing controller parameters is done through software innovation.
- Then there is the recovery value of cc by different controls.
The knobs are supposed infinite avoided jump values, it works pretty well but we need to turn the knob a few degrees before starting to change a setting.
I do not speak but not normal knobs.
- The automap is really the big advantage of this controller, it is finally the voice of a universal machine. By mark against my daw is not always the controller.
I sometimes have to reboot several times before the controller is detected.
It often touches crisis nerds.
The automatic mapping is not hyper point either. It would have been quite a few together some basic function in the same places that the user have pins.
Kind for synth + cutoff + resonance envelope in the same places.
- The pads are MUCH too hard! The mpc it tells you something?
- Finally, it concerns the new version: But why did you delete the second screen???
Why go back???
Again I find this system very hyper automap, I accommodated all its flaws, and again after all the templates I am getting returned and I know the tricks to make it work properly.
But what I find distressing is that innovation is close to the perfect product for those who make the computer music. Vst to control its universally and separate from this damn mouse.
But there is still ....
If you have any other comments similar it would be nice to share them here.
These people have included in innovation.
I look forward to the v3 controller.
I imagine that it is expensive to develop the perfect product, and that sells more when the price is low, but why the world is abandoned noon? Why not make a line "public" and line "upscale", as speakers, mixer etc. ...
Gentlemen in innovations help us please. "