Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Pioneer CMX 3000
Images
1/138

All user reviews of 5/5 for the Pioneer CMX 3000

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Filter
4.2/5
(21 reviews)
52 %
(11 reviews)
33 %
(7 reviews)
5 %
(1 review)
Write a user review
Value For Money : Excellent
Users reviews
  • tidjacktidjack

    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 11/12/04 at 10:22
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I have one friend who owns this board !!!! Frankly nothing to say! Finally, perhaps the scratch that does not give the effect of a real scratch! I have also had the opportunity of esseil evening with him to techno! Thanks to its counters bpm very accurate !! and also are self beats! Sometimes maybe not sync well but not often! also nothing to say!
  • titouutitouu

    product and super simple utlisation

    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 01/14/12 at 03:40
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    The Pioneer CMX 3000 is really a good product for its features and ease of use (Multi-format CD Audio, CD-R, CD-RW, function "Emergency Loop
    3 Hot Cues, Automatic synchronization of tempos, Scratch Mode, Wave Function Display, 2 digital outputs, Master Tempo, Loop adjustable IN and OUT, Inserting the CD slot in, Legato Link.
    Very good for the mobile disco.
  • sissebsisseb

    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 01/07/04 at 15:17
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I use it for almost two years discomobile.
    No worries, though orders trs think, easily accessible.
    Automatic enchantment, but effective on the securities o trsrgulier rhythm is otherwise useless.
    Scratch function, not a scratch rel, but plutt take as an effect (there are indeed delayed the resumption of the music when it lche o ring).
    The hot starts are INTERESTED trs and efficient.
    It gre CD TEXT is a great feature when you have a computer drive.
    Its default: Accs blocked the tracks when introducing the CD. Wait until the CD is recognized by the player to change tracks. Function quickly becomes tiresome as scratch limit. If not say anything, it is Designed, like all Pioneer CD …
    Read more
    I use it for almost two years discomobile.
    No worries, though orders trs think, easily accessible.
    Automatic enchantment, but effective on the securities o trsrgulier rhythm is otherwise useless.
    Scratch function, not a scratch rel, but plutt take as an effect (there are indeed delayed the resumption of the music when it lche o ring).
    The hot starts are INTERESTED trs and efficient.
    It gre CD TEXT is a great feature when you have a computer drive.
    Its default: Accs blocked the tracks when introducing the CD. Wait until the CD is recognized by the player to change tracks. Function quickly becomes tiresome as scratch limit. If not say anything, it is Designed, like all Pioneer CD players.
    See less
  • djnrickdjnrick

    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 11/07/04 at 16:30
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Hi, I'm near the 2 years I use the CMX 3000, c frankly a good machine, what's missing is a box built-in effects. perfect timing wheel, hot cue are top, you can even back your loop directly above and in the evening simply insert your CD for the machine to recognize the very interresting. Which sometimes is not great is that it may take some time to load some cdr burned, but it is not common. If you want to mix plates only CMX should do the trick. on the other hand do not expect to scratch with a CDJ 1000 or 800 elsewhere besides that I have 2 cdj 800.

    Finally it was good stuff you will not have unpleasant surprises.
    Read more
    Hi, I'm near the 2 years I use the CMX 3000, c frankly a good machine, what's missing is a box built-in effects. perfect timing wheel, hot cue are top, you can even back your loop directly above and in the evening simply insert your CD for the machine to recognize the very interresting. Which sometimes is not great is that it may take some time to load some cdr burned, but it is not common. If you want to mix plates only CMX should do the trick. on the other hand do not expect to scratch with a CDJ 1000 or 800 elsewhere besides that I have 2 cdj 800.

    Finally it was good stuff you will not have unpleasant surprises.
    See less
  • Dj fou 87Dj fou 87

    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 11/11/04 at 12:18
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    It's been a year since I use this machine and its progress! perfect curls, perfect timing, hot cue well tudi can even record the loops and it's cool. However the scratch is not at all gnial but hey, a platinum as it has for the first mix! And it did a good job!
  • lacharrierlacharrier

    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 02/24/05 at 15:21
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    J'utilisecette plate for about a year and I am not satisfied prs. We arrive to take in hand after 10 minutes, each button possde a function (not like the Denon or you have to play with normment button and thank you for not taking his hand)
    It Ragit like clockwork I scratch with Mrs. Russ without too much problem!
    When even a small default: the platinum "plantquot; several times in the middle of night and it took the rdmarrer. But with a head cleaning reading everything went arranged. The loops are just perfect there is a small dcalage tempo when using the "emergency loop" which can Dranger in a mix.
    I think this is a good choice for this award because two platinum brand with its funct…
    Read more
    J'utilisecette plate for about a year and I am not satisfied prs. We arrive to take in hand after 10 minutes, each button possde a function (not like the Denon or you have to play with normment button and thank you for not taking his hand)
    It Ragit like clockwork I scratch with Mrs. Russ without too much problem!
    When even a small default: the platinum "plantquot; several times in the middle of night and it took the rdmarrer. But with a head cleaning reading everything went arranged. The loops are just perfect there is a small dcalage tempo when using the "emergency loop" which can Dranger in a mix.
    I think this is a good choice for this award because two platinum brand with its function as a low plusde 1000 we find no beacoup. Pioneer thank you!
    See less
  • maestro_84maestro_84

    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 03/07/06 at 06:14
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I have this double platinum for about 5 years is a real treat, even if I have not had the opportunity to test many other decks, I realize that it really makes a lot of things Contrary to another, such as changing the tempo keeping the pitch (this is not found on many decks, or even any, may be the cmx-5000 I do not know ....) and even level accuracies it's a terrible walk, with settings cue with amazingly simple ... and even for the scratch I think we do really cool stuff easily; system with snap discs course .... short test it, just a night you will see!

    I blame him one bit is not read mp3 cd ... but hey, I understand that Pioneer wants to keep a certain quality so we forgive ....

    I …
    Read more
    I have this double platinum for about 5 years is a real treat, even if I have not had the opportunity to test many other decks, I realize that it really makes a lot of things Contrary to another, such as changing the tempo keeping the pitch (this is not found on many decks, or even any, may be the cmx-5000 I do not know ....) and even level accuracies it's a terrible walk, with settings cue with amazingly simple ... and even for the scratch I think we do really cool stuff easily; system with snap discs course .... short test it, just a night you will see!

    I blame him one bit is not read mp3 cd ... but hey, I understand that Pioneer wants to keep a certain quality so we forgive ....

    I had paid 1200 euros almost 5 years ago
    I easily put 999 euros, if I had to buy one ... but it's not, it still works as well, nothing to report!
    See less
  • sust'mdsust'md

    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 03/07/06 at 10:12
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    Hi to all
    I use a CMX 3000 for about 5 years.
    Before I mixais with a Denon DN 2500.
    At the beginning I found the system of the wheel not obvious, but once you get the hang of, what up ... how easy to mix. When I look back on my old dn2500 I galley to mix so it's better to start with the CMX 3000 ....!
    in 5 years never any down, just once a CD that refused to read, but otherwise it works great, just one regret is that there have only 3 points per CD memorable. Dn of the 2500 memo was best for
  • hotmichhotmich

    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 12/31/06 at 09:16
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    How long have you use it?

    I use it for one week to purchase priceminister

    What is the particular feature you like best and least?

    trs trs simple to use! the record's only cover it serves me for being protected from dusts: P! non srieusement in 1 hour it was getting started!
    I do not think it is weak, maybe the lack of effect and not reading the mp3 but it's no big deal ...

    Have you tried many other models before acqurir?

    Premire is not my plate, I just tried to quickly do the dns but I prefer the 1000 cmx3000

    How do you report qualitprix?

    So it's expensive pioneer! we must know what you want! 1100 new but you can find used and in very good condition for about 500! trs…
    Read more
    How long have you use it?

    I use it for one week to purchase priceminister

    What is the particular feature you like best and least?

    trs trs simple to use! the record's only cover it serves me for being protected from dusts: P! non srieusement in 1 hour it was getting started!
    I do not think it is weak, maybe the lack of effect and not reading the mp3 but it's no big deal ...

    Have you tried many other models before acqurir?

    Premire is not my plate, I just tried to quickly do the dns but I prefer the 1000 cmx3000

    How do you report qualitprix?

    So it's expensive pioneer! we must know what you want! 1100 new but you can find used and in very good condition for about 500! trs bone quality but I can find one cheap though, sof of opportunity!

    Exprience with, you will do again this choice? ...

    yes no Siter! trs good plate! me that beginners in the DJing I have all on the Russian master! trs simple, complete, great ...!
    See less
  • FP UserFP User

    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 10/31/08 at 16:00
    Everything excelent.... but I 'd like a Reverse swith and a better scratch like CDJ 1000

    Price paid

    900

    Sound quality: Good

    User interface: excelent The manual: I didn't need it All is easy for a fast mix

    Originally posted on FutureProducers.com
    Posted by: Unknown (January 1-, 2003)
  • FP UserFP User

    Pioneer CMX 3000Published on 10/31/08 at 16:00
    It has everything you need.

    excelent sound quality, no problems at all.

    Very easy to use, very intuitive. For a newbie like me, it was about a week. From then on, you only have to continue playing with it.

    the cd's tend to unload not so smoothly after a year. the jog wheel gets a little bit dirty and doesn´t flow as before

    This is an excelent piece of equipment, I would buy it again if I had to. Very well made, no loose bottons, the pitch slider works very well after a year of banging mixes.

    Originally posted on FutureProducers.com
    Posted by: wakus ( 5-, 2004)