All user reviews for the Seymour Duncan SH-4 JB Model

I have this microphone for over a year, I put on my first Yamaha I know what (alder body) and I just install it on my Dean (mahogany body, table Saddle).
Well, it's an Alnico, an adjustable studs ct splittable, RAS. I had put on my Yam splittable, it sounded good in one case (splitter as in the other, and I have not more attack, but a little too sharp c'tait-mdium as I have been able to account once I had my PRS.
APRs have been on my Dean, the opposite: he attacks the right thing and potatoes to which the Czech mtal well, and harmonics come out great, but it is not too sharp as the other guitar. I do not use against more by the split.
In short, a good microphone, I would recommend a guitar with heavy wooden rputs plutt dark, like mahogany. It will provide the precision, potato and treble Necessary for ptent good riffs, but beware of harmonics, many are easy to get, but then imposing a guitar and play well RULES own!

He rode home on my LAG, coupled with the inevitable SH1 59 ... And it's simply divine.
Compared with Di Marzio PAF PRO and Super Distortion, it is light years ahead.

It has a grain incredible versatility of a rare. This responsiveness, this level of output and made such a low / Medium in the light or whatever the level of saturation mailings that he seems unreal for a passive pickup.
Split it become worthy of the Fender bridge. Or how to go from Gilmour, Vai was in Machine Head with a single microphone.
Its agreement with one in SH1 Neck is well established. The versatility in its purest form!

I last year, mounted on a house (we do not laugh!) Copy les paul mahogany body, mahogany neck, table stocky, splittable version, coupled with a splittable sh1 aussi.C is THE micro IDAL acute for rock and clean sound hard.En Splitt is not so good (that said I do not like that of the les paul), splitter is better, especially for rhythmic the "long train running", is coupled to sh1 Splitt IDAL for arpges in short, if you play blues, rock, hard (no mtal, it lacks a bit of gain for has a combination prfrez EMG 81 and 85) is to adopt the SSAI. the price is given the gift qualit.Je not change the micro for the world (for the Paul at least). On a Start, I do not know what can give a

I use it for 2 months on an easel Ibanez MC300 (Mahogany body, neck-through).
I chose it because I needed a microphone that restores shine and slamming my guitar all dark. I've won quite a lot of singing with EHJV surly trs, trs what rock'n'roll. For it is not against and not hyper prcis trs home in the grave. In drop D with a distortion of the sounds pretty rough.
I find it near the trs DiMarzio Norton in brighter / slamming and incisive that it prcis but less and less comfortable in the grave. One could say that the sh-4 is oriented rock hard punk-rock trend 70 Led Zep coughed, while Norton is more modern, more solid and can go for the mtal "quietly".
It has an output level as a lv trs trs tone zone but the precision and color have nothing to see here is saturated to the dirty, not cinderblock.
I put 8 because it is very well, but its lack in the bass can sometimes be Gnant.

I install the microphone on a fender jag stang.
I find it really not bad, compared to sourtout original pickups.
A microphone that is very versatile, especially if it is known to change the equalization of an amp, it goes almost everywhere in disto is very very good clean sounds as in
After the 4-conductor cables let you use differently depending on the microphone wiring as you wish, which is a humbucker ...
But remember that the microphone is just one link in a long chain in the development of sound, and you'll have a beautiful great with a micro scratch, cables, an amp and a set of crap, ca never change anything!
bought in the U.S. for 55 euros including shipping, genial!