Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
Our members also liked:
4.8/5(4 reviews)
75 %
25 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
- LfPublished on 07/23/13 at 06:55 (This content has been automatically translated from French)This is a static small diaphragm cardioid microphone. I recommend it for miking acoustic instruments in the studio.
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for 2 years in stereo with a AT2020 (lower quality, but also excellent considering its price). The positive points of the KSM137 are its versatility, accuracy and the ability to reduce low frequency switch. The negative point is precisely the size of the switches manipulated with a small screwdriver (not practical).16 - moosersPublished on 11/23/11 at 17:48The Shure KSM137 is a small diaphragm condenser that is made for using in a recording studio setting. This is a newer Shure mic, but I only used it for the first time recently. It's a cardioid microphone and has a 20 Hz to 20 kHz frequency response, which is of course the full range of human hearing. It's got a pad that has either -15 db or - 25 db of attenuation and also has a low cut option for both 80 Hz and 115 Hz. It's the perfect condenser for a variety of applications.
OVERALL OPINION
The Shure KSM137 is a nice choice for a pretty inexpensive small diaphragm condenser mic. It's not the most versatile or most brilliant sounding microphone, but will definitely work well f…Read moreThe Shure KSM137 is a small diaphragm condenser that is made for using in a recording studio setting. This is a newer Shure mic, but I only used it for the first time recently. It's a cardioid microphone and has a 20 Hz to 20 kHz frequency response, which is of course the full range of human hearing. It's got a pad that has either -15 db or - 25 db of attenuation and also has a low cut option for both 80 Hz and 115 Hz. It's the perfect condenser for a variety of applications.
OVERALL OPINION
The Shure KSM137 is a nice choice for a pretty inexpensive small diaphragm condenser mic. It's not the most versatile or most brilliant sounding microphone, but will definitely work well for a variety of situations and doesn't cost very much money. I've used it for recording the bottom of a snare drum and on acoustic guitar thus far, but it's going to sound just fine in a home studio setting for just about anything where a small diaphragm condenser would be relevant. It's probably not a pro mic when it comes to acoustic guitar and other acoustic instruments like that, but it's perfect for something like snare bottom where you don't necessarily need it to pick up such a large range as you would with acoustic guitar. Still, the Shure KSM137 is perfect for the home studio owner who wants a nice sounding and inexpensive small diaphragm condenser. In a pro setting it'll be more limited, but is still a solid mic. Of course it's got the Shure name attached with it so you can rely on their reputation when you think about longevity and stability, which has been the trademark of Shure for many years. Definitely get into looking at the KSM137 if you want a small diaphragm condenser for cheap without sacrificing too much quality.See less10 - ProdatlantisPublished on 12/22/08 at 03:43 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Cardioid microphone of good quality trs.
OVERALL OPINION
I've had six months and I used to catch the sounds of wind instruments, percussion, bass, drums, and I find trs trs good.
It sound a little Shure typ.
Sound transparent, very easy mix ...
Briefly, the class.15