All user reviews of 1/5 for the Marshall MG100HDFX

Transistor amp 100w hp 12 '

Effects: clean / crunch, delay, reverb, mod, preset recording, effects loop

Among 1 guitar jack, 1 mini jack online

Outputs: 1 mini jack for speaker 4ohms

USE

Above all, I prcises I'm not scratch at all, I know the world especially amps PA / keyboard. So my opinion is probably perspective. I know this amp because a member of my group has bought one, I'm amen involuntarily compare those of other guitarists of my knowledge (various models: peavey, vox, fender, marschall , transistor, lamp)



<em>Simple Config?</em>

Yes and no: it's an amp with gain, volume and master, so far none of the complicated fine. But the pots are not potentiometers "classic", these are sensors, not very well grs my opinion. So much so that when switching from clean crunch with volume one level, these levels are changing, as if we had candles in the same time the knob ... Example: clean with mini gain, volume Min. Support to enter the crunch: big sound instantaneously when we should be nothing, since we are in the kids ... Idem clean crunch ...



<em>Gets it easy to sound good?</em>

This is the default standard that made me post this review, because I think it's unbearable not to mention "his" artistic creativity within the meaning but only "his" under "sound clean, "no, you can not have a good sound with an amp that is a veritable breath factory! Turn the gain mini, mini volume, turn up the master not least that 2: breath worthy of a non syntonis radio! And del than half is the storm! I know it's a 100watts, so there is always a little breath, but not much! And especially low levels. Gain mini or background, no difference: as if the Pramp was always background, and the gain knob was only down "virtually" level.

SONORITS

No opinion, I let guitarists judge that.

NOTICE GLOBAL

I reprcise I'm not a guitarist, so my opinion is worth what it is worth. I hope that others will scratch theirs. My opinion is based on listening to other models peavey, vox, fender or Marschal transistor or lamp.

it is not me, I discovered the amp Last week, I have a good time gambling ds all directions to try to minimize the damn breath. Nothing to do.

What I like the most, for what I know guitar: good power, enough complte connectivity, Section of cool effects, possibility to record 4 rglages

What I like least: the breath! breath and breath again! And also this bug volume change between clean and crunch

<em>How do you report qualitprix?</em>

In light of other amps guitarist I know, 400 one can certainly find some fewer watts, but otherwise the best! The effects section, the memorization is good, but what to do with an amp that even send you the Mistral 2? With a "usual" amp blowing qud pushed, at worst it can be put less strong and resume ds PA. But even gain and volume 0 (which in any fawn does not serve grd thing ...) and master 2 or 3, dj bcp too much away! <em>
</em>

If other guitarists can contradict me, that I got taken as a ball to rgler, great. But otherwise, I repeats my old principle: better less power, less frills, but solid and clean base. In this case, perhaps a 40watts range above, with less hoopla, but without the unmanageable storm ...

100 watts, but one wonders where he will look for them, a 20 watts gives a better potato
dual connection jack 6.35
effects ..... reverb! do not ask too much!

UTILIZATION

Set simple, ca was on, but anyway it is useless to rgler is a real crap in any case it was a sound of shit, I test with an ibanez and Jackson, and even putting the bass at least with a minimum load in HP, low saturated dead!

SOUNDS

So as I disai above, the sound is really not great, the highs do not stand out at all, even with the maximum prsence is the kind of head who do not even try to push.

OVERALL OPINION

Personally, I think it's the kind of stuff that will make music a beginners dtest
and contrary to the opinion below, even to a volume, it is clearly the diffrence with a tube amp, there is no photo as it looks.
and also in terms of feedback, Marshall amps consoit trs his evil ...., Randall is largely better than that ... (When you look at the price you understand)

It is a 100% head transistors, not the least light preamp or amplifier.
For spec see other opinions on this comprehensive ...

UTILIZATION

The settings are very classic, nothing complicated ... Now find a good sound is extremely difficult in that this amp does not ring anything to do, I never managed to get good sound when I found myself with the head in the studio.

SOUNDS

Arriving in a studio again, my biggest fear is a Marshall MG, these cold monsters that have the name of Marshall ... Whenever he happened to play on this amp, I left half depressed because I had not managed to get THE sound. Even on a good HP 4x12 JCM, the sound is flat ... The distortions are terrible, we seek sound and it only happens to attract all the neighborhood cats (the mewing of the amp though strident must please them! Hehe).

In addition, the amplifier accepts pedals very little external, including overdrive or distortion ... The sound is not clear, rough, flat and cold.

2 / 10 for clean sounds, very "transistors" that can pass, but in some styles.

OVERALL OPINION

I'm surprised to see such positive feedback on notes & this amp ... One of two things: either I have tried wrong (though I often find myself having to play on repeat in the studio when there is no more than that ... ahem), or those who wrote those opinions n have never played on a real full amp tubes. A JCM sounds far better ...

My overall opinion is very, very mixed: this amp does not ring. He might look great, with its logo Marshall, clean sounds are cold, loud distortion at will, no heat, a large hole in the mids ...

A leak of urgency for those looking for a good amp stage. May agree to limit to a few lines at home ...