Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Waldorf Micro Q
Images
1/303

All user reviews of 4/5 for the Waldorf Micro Q

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
4.6/5
(7 reviews)
57 %
(4 reviews)
43 %
(3 reviews)
Write a user review
Users reviews
  • denmakesmusicdenmakesmusic

    Waldorf Micro QPublished on 07/17/05 at 09:16
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    I have a 25-way version, for now it is enough for me, the features are allchantes (2 multimode filters, envelopes 4 3 LFO + matrix)
    Most are in sync oscilloscope and multi-mode filters with Comb.
    Obviously the matrix permits full of DLIR.
    LFOs can sync to the tempo.
    Arpeggiator.
    Vocoder.
    Between audio.
    Multi, drumMap, multiple outputs.

    UTILIZATION

    The edition on the synth itself is quite galley because you have to pass parameters directly to constantly shift parameters so it's difficult to get a hand on the keyboard and the other to change the settings, despite 4 pots.
    For the matrix is ​​the horror, we do not visualize, so unless you go through all we do not know…
    Read more
    I have a 25-way version, for now it is enough for me, the features are allchantes (2 multimode filters, envelopes 4 3 LFO + matrix)
    Most are in sync oscilloscope and multi-mode filters with Comb.
    Obviously the matrix permits full of DLIR.
    LFOs can sync to the tempo.
    Arpeggiator.
    Vocoder.
    Between audio.
    Multi, drumMap, multiple outputs.

    UTILIZATION

    The edition on the synth itself is quite galley because you have to pass parameters directly to constantly shift parameters so it's difficult to get a hand on the keyboard and the other to change the settings, despite 4 pots.
    For the matrix is ​​the horror, we do not visualize, so unless you go through all we do not know what was programmed.
    You have to go through a program editor to draw sounds. I am a right now to MacOSX.
    The manual is very good, with examples and tips.

    SOUNDS

    The sound is generally good trs. The distortion of the filters can get dirty sounds.
    Obviously it is not worth a lot but it is analog. The possibilities are standard.
    The effects are pretty gadgets, it's better without it, except the phaser that I find quite a bit.
    For solo sounds, I have mixed feelings because the filter has a funny running on the keyboard follow.
    If I compare with my Matrix1000, it has many more sounds possible, but it is a little colder. As against the envelopes are faster and is better for sound sequences.

    OVERALL OPINION

    I use it for several months, in fact I spent more time programming the editor so I have not done a lot of sounds.
    I bought it 350 euros. I think for that price it has a lot of opportunities, obviously no longer Waldorf j'espre so he will not let me go ...
    See less
  • kaos2323kaos2323

    Waldorf Micro QPublished on 12/17/06 at 15:32
    (This content has been automatically translated from French)
    View previous opinions! It features good audio inputs and outputs in sufficient numbers to be used as the main synth!

    UTILIZATION

    Good programming is not obvious especially in the beginning! The organization of the synth is clear and logical (as always with Waldorf!) But against the practice is much more complex the system of 'Matrix' assignment (the same as the Pulse of the same brand) is not obvious to manage given the number of parameters available for the synthesis ... That said for aficionados of the brand (including myself!) Is finally not such a big problem that a. .. After several weeks of frustration is starting to figure it out rather easily even if certain features are…
    Read more
    View previous opinions! It features good audio inputs and outputs in sufficient numbers to be used as the main synth!

    UTILIZATION

    Good programming is not obvious especially in the beginning! The organization of the synth is clear and logical (as always with Waldorf!) But against the practice is much more complex the system of 'Matrix' assignment (the same as the Pulse of the same brand) is not obvious to manage given the number of parameters available for the synthesis ... That said for aficionados of the brand (including myself!) Is finally not such a big problem that a. .. After several weeks of frustration is starting to figure it out rather easily even if certain features are sometimes well hidden!

    As against a debutant at risk of more complicated especially since this kind of usability issues can definitely dégouter!

    They add a MIDI control surface dedicated it to this one machine (Behringer style) solves the problem but asked to agree to take the lead in a program before you can fully use it. Therefore not at the door of a newcomer to the world of synthesis and MIDI!

    on the other hand for fans in those without the annoyances are worth the trouble in my opinion ...

    SOUNDS

    Then against it by not bad at all considering the price (used) machine: as usual with the color palette Waldorf sound available is very wide and yet kind and original!

    The sound is clean and smooth (sometimes a cold can!) But ultimately it's not as unpleasant in some Japanese brand (in my opinion of course!).

    In fact after a while one begins to find that it is even an advantage because it can do everything rather well! The distos allow dirty violent sounds and some color filters have a 'digital' very special not found in any other brand (the resonators 'combs filters' for example!).

    When the sound is a strictly analog approaches it without having the eppaiseur and the organic and living a real ... Yet in a mix of illusion works pretty good! In fact I'd buy just to make the final analog modeling and I use it more for its own creative qualities of the original sounds to make a modeling itself!

    From a sound design for a real surprise for me especially as coupled with the excellent arpeggio we get to do evolutionary sequence of strange and very personal! Finally a full-fledged synth that should be useful for its own merits rather than for use as a give ... every time at Waldorf finally!

    OVERALL OPINION

    I use it for 3 years and it became one of the digital synths I use most regularly.

    As indicated previously this is not a machine for beginners (because of its ergonomic ... mainly they should rather seek to remedy these shortcomings Q to use!) But if you're broke and looking for a versatile machine and can help you all do well (pads, leads, basses, fx, sounds' cheloux',...) and even to engage in sound research (combined filters and filter types Varis, matrix modulation powerful arpeggio interressant ,...) is a choice not to be overlooked.

    We can still miss him repprocher slightly at first character of the issue, then once the effect of marketing spend 'analog modeled'il is attaching to its qualities that go far beyond a. ..
    See less
  • FP UserFP User

    Waldorf Micro QPublished on 10/31/08 at 16:00
    The micro Q is very powerful, but it does take a little patience to get used to. The parameters are all mapped out in a matrix fassion.

    Price paid

    600

    UTILIZATION

    I give it an 8 because, Waldorf did a great job mapping the information matrix out. Anyone should be able to pick it up fairly quickly.

    Other than the midi-syncing issue, this thing is great.

    SOUNDS

    It's more of an aggressive sound.

    OVERALL OPINION

    Originally posted on FutureProducers.com
    Posted by: Unknown (January 1-, 2003)