All user reviews of 5/5 for the Numark CDX 1

I had a first generation not really interesting different problem.
The two months since I bought 2 and is pleasantly surprised with the latest releases updates nickel. Some bug from time to time but nothing serious any more than another.
I tried C324 Stanton, Gemini CDJ700, Pioneer CDJ 1000MK3, 800 et850.
I love the touch vinyl.
I like least the 10kg weight lol.
Go for my 200 euro is good.
Yes no doubt against really pay attention to the latest versions.

My Club Gear Appoints possde 2 CDX
Beautiful and versatile, scratch and cue are magic
you tap the tempo by hand if you're press and hop a loop ...
One big snag, it will be remedied soon as Numark and disaster-ready time of a disk
Around 20 seconds and the fact that all is not read MP3 (320 Kps)
still a little reproach, surprising given the pro style and night of racing machines: no lighting between Cd is posing problem in club

Otherwise, it's really now -12/2004) are the top players right in front of Technics cd denon and pioneer (brand I Live test too) it's simple I numrise my records to avoid having had to use my technics, unfortunately cd imports dance and RB are rarely

I have them for 4 months and these are my first turntables, n effect a few small flaws:
"It is rare but sometimes bug ca
With a cd-mp3, the search function is very slow
-Cd should be in a perfect state, otherwise it may buger or even not work at all
-The use of visual cues such as: After scootch on vinyl can not or you find yourself very quickly with 50 pieces of scootch ...
-Buttons are small but compensates illuminca)
otherwise

-The effects are superb for my taste, especially the sonar and filters
-The total effect is vinyl
-Loops are simple to do and change

in short, I find them very well, despite the mini defaults, he does not forget all the false benefits they offer, especially the mixing or scratching noises personal cd set ...

Holder of this model for 7 months
the highlight of this plate is an excellent touch Obviously with the same sensations vynil. The two large buttons dmarage are handy and flexible hope, the search ranges for rotary is pretty convenient, same for the indoor dplacement the beach. The buttons of the effects are somewhat small but the sound effects plutt well. The loop hold easily with the Systm BEATKEEPER of Numark and can then adjust 1, 2, 3, 4-stroke and so on ... Once again the buttons are a bit small and stiff. The screen is readable and trs contains lots of information.
APRS test CDJ1000 and SLDZ Technics, Numark's Submitted really the best touch and it was his strong point. Cot features, try and compare them according to their needs.
It's expensive, but hey it's certainly the price of a premium
I would do probably the same choice if I had a small problem on the engine to insert the CD (1 month SAV), it's really a pleasure to mix with.

Hi all
Here is the 5 months that I have this board and I highly recommend a hiphop dj all (for the electro music I do not know what this is) I have two TT200 front for bin scratch and frankly I prefer scratchté with cdx lol touch and really very close and extremely scratch Sufis for ALL (flare transform .....)
level of reliability and ben first model had problems of integration c cd but since ended and no concern for short scratheur unleash who want to have personal phrase or even make a scratch comorbid while there is no longer the limit I think this board will remain a good reference to scratch aaaaaa +

Hello, with all the opinions ngatifs and positive that I read, I do not agree because I had sl1200mk2 I try denon cd dns5000 which is not terrible, which is Denon's dn3500s not bad at all, pioneer cdj 800 of which means, sl-dz 1200 technics of which is the worst cd of slp1200 of technics as 15 years ago that were really bad (I had 2 before) and j 'I finally numark 2 cdx1 which frankly is the closest platinum cd has a turntable which has more electronics cd.Cot effect of the numark has the most classic effects that work very well but denon, technics and Pioneer are better provided cot effects but if you mix with SL1200 turntables, you have no effects while I think it's the DJ that is effective and which are the most imprssionne when scratch, cut, mix, ect ..

I use them for a year, every day I come home, I turn them on I put my CD I turn on the amp and I shook the house, one day I forget my Fetra open and my CDX taient just endessous. When I returned, I almost keeled over and I have to return the water out by all the buttons (I admit I cried) I have schez in everywhere, I have Allum and it worked perfectly, NUMARK it's solid!
I test the technics ELZ 1200 I'm not sure what, but such imitation CDX junk really zero! It's good for Technics turntables but otherwise it will faloir forget!

I use my CDX has DMOS scratch and gents were particulirement intrsss to Systm XR8K, how it is possible to simulate both a CD like vinyl is silent two, one on vinyl and I on my CDX, FLOW is the style and not the hardware that judges the artist!

Before this acqurir MODEL I ssay:
- Numark HDX (simulator too Soft)
- Pioneer CDJ100 (the worst ever seen)
- Pioneer CDJ1000 (it is good but not quite account with CDX)
- Reloop 909S (dgeulasse)
- Numark Axis 4 (not good enough)
- Numark axis 9 (scratch more important to me)
- Denon S5000 (not my finally being convinced)
- And other stuff JBSYSTEMS dgeulasse forget

great price quality ratio maintenat only 699 or less a year ago it cost 990 euros and 1700 euros 3 years ago

I encourage everyone who is considering purchasing a good CD player for this mix and scratch MODEL l!
Contact me if you want pictures advice etc ...