Filter
Our members also liked:
4.8/5(13 reviews)
62 %
23 %
8 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
totoche3Published on 03/09/05 at 03:50 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Fully agree with the opinions below
Pioneer demonstrated reliability and robustness in its cdj 1000 mkII, which remains a reader friendly design, intuitive, and relatively "easy to use" in the dark of a DJ booth. But for the same price for an equivalent reliability, Denon turntables worth a cdj 1000, and may be even more interesting in terms of evolutivit and proposed functions DJ. OK, some functions are quite complex on the Denon.
If you want the same plates you have seen in pictures of DJ renomms cot in Sono Mag, buy Pioneer 1000. If you want to be a little more cratif and do some music, why not Denon 5000.00
_Chris_Published on 11/06/03 at 03:31 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I do not like too much the opinion of the gentleman who works for Pioneer, it has nothing constructive ...
For my part I t sduit this deck that has a great kick in the market for CD players leaving.
However, times have changed even the MK2 does not compete in terms crativit functionality with its competitor Denon S5000 and with future Technics SL-DZ1200.
So it's expensive for not much:
- A loop, wow! ca is rvolutionnaire!
- 3 hot cue
- A pitch + / -100% (only on the MK2)
- The display of the waveform
- Memory (Denon did this for 10 years ...)
In rsum I think it can be nice to buy a pair of CDJ 1000 OCCAZ, but nine, attention to good competition testing, opinions will cha…Read moreI do not like too much the opinion of the gentleman who works for Pioneer, it has nothing constructive ...
For my part I t sduit this deck that has a great kick in the market for CD players leaving.
However, times have changed even the MK2 does not compete in terms crativit functionality with its competitor Denon S5000 and with future Technics SL-DZ1200.
So it's expensive for not much:
- A loop, wow! ca is rvolutionnaire!
- 3 hot cue
- A pitch + / -100% (only on the MK2)
- The display of the waveform
- Memory (Denon did this for 10 years ...)
In rsum I think it can be nice to buy a pair of CDJ 1000 OCCAZ, but nine, attention to good competition testing, opinions will change.See less10- tony on-linePublished on 09/24/06 at 04:44 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Hello,
> I use the CDJ1000 + eures years since. They are present ds ttes my sheets (versions available).
> CD robust and reliable enough in the functions requested. I quite agree with the opinion left below. For those who mix across our small planet like me, this is a reference that is found in almost all providers.
> Since the advent of CD players-flat, I used the Pioneer. Not that I'm an aficionado of the brand, but by early next + "platinum reference" ds heads available data sheets.
> It's a little pet peeve of the brand ... the price! certainly high enough for my taste. Vs. tjs have the opportunity to purchase outside of France and to enjoy certain tax advantages (but this is…Read moreHello,
> I use the CDJ1000 + eures years since. They are present ds ttes my sheets (versions available).
> CD robust and reliable enough in the functions requested. I quite agree with the opinion left below. For those who mix across our small planet like me, this is a reference that is found in almost all providers.
> Since the advent of CD players-flat, I used the Pioneer. Not that I'm an aficionado of the brand, but by early next + "platinum reference" ds heads available data sheets.
> It's a little pet peeve of the brand ... the price! certainly high enough for my taste. Vs. tjs have the opportunity to purchase outside of France and to enjoy certain tax advantages (but this is us!)
> Why change? Maybe for testing products from the competition. Always be his own opinion.See less00