Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
Our members also liked:
4.4/5(7 reviews)
43 %
43 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
- nicolasmarty-omegaPublished on 11/21/13 at 15:26 (This content has been automatically translated from French)price, number of tracks, usb, effect, minimum latency loop.
use a laptop hp i7 8g ram with cubase
UTILIZATION
for drivers no problems with win 7
I use the Tascam with cubase
low latency barely audible
GETTING STARTED
time to find the right driver for win 7 on the Tascam site
the general config is simple, max capacity of the Tascam you always have low latency
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for more than a year
the + 8 XLR inputs, 4 output, the effects loop
good value for money
if I had to change the interface I will model above that does not exist yet
I imagine in USB 3.0 with 2 or 3 headphone outputs a control room, memory function ....Read moreprice, number of tracks, usb, effect, minimum latency loop.
use a laptop hp i7 8g ram with cubase
UTILIZATION
for drivers no problems with win 7
I use the Tascam with cubase
low latency barely audible
GETTING STARTED
time to find the right driver for win 7 on the Tascam site
the general config is simple, max capacity of the Tascam you always have low latency
OVERALL OPINION
I use it for more than a year
the + 8 XLR inputs, 4 output, the effects loop
good value for money
if I had to change the interface I will model above that does not exist yet
I imagine in USB 3.0 with 2 or 3 headphone outputs a control room, memory function ....See less10 - AnonymousPublished on 10/31/11 at 00:11The TASCAM US 2000 is a pretty more souped up version of the popular US 1641. The appeal of these Tascam interfaces hits the same spot with everyone every time. They offer so many channels for such a rock bottom price that you just cannot pass it up! Right? One thing that the Tascam US 2000 is strangely lacking however, is MIDI. I am not quite sure how it did not make it on there, but if you take one look at the interface, in typical Tascam fashion, this company seemed to not waste any space. In fact, I am quite certain the people over there are neurotically obsessed with making the interface look as busy as possible, because that is certainly the impression that the US 2000 gave to me! Unl…Read moreThe TASCAM US 2000 is a pretty more souped up version of the popular US 1641. The appeal of these Tascam interfaces hits the same spot with everyone every time. They offer so many channels for such a rock bottom price that you just cannot pass it up! Right? One thing that the Tascam US 2000 is strangely lacking however, is MIDI. I am not quite sure how it did not make it on there, but if you take one look at the interface, in typical Tascam fashion, this company seemed to not waste any space. In fact, I am quite certain the people over there are neurotically obsessed with making the interface look as busy as possible, because that is certainly the impression that the US 2000 gave to me! Unlike the 1641, most of the microphone inputs are located on the back, which may make more sense in many applications.
UTILIZATION
What I did find incredibly joyous about the US 2000 however, was its method of monitoring for headphones. On a budget interface, you would only expect to see a knob that controls the ratio of monitoring sound coming from the computer verses the combined inputs. However, the US 2000 generously allows the user to set both volumes separately, which means that fiddling with knobs to strike the perfect balance between volume and ratio is a thing of the past! This is unlike the younger cousin, the 1641, which I am consistently bothered by on a day to day basis. I also find the meters very useful for maintaining balance when recording.
GETTING STARTED
The drivers for the US 2000 are a dream and run incredibly smoothly. Thus, this audio interface is just like any other proper interface. Works. No questions. No need to explain.
OVERALL OPINION
The preamps on this are a little bit better than that of the 1641's I have observed. They seems to have a little more excitement and energy. However, that is not even the main draw. To be truthful, the lack of midi makes syncing latencies when doing midi a little bit frustrating, and that is why even with all of its improvements I cannot truly recommend the 2000 over the 1641 or the 1800.See less00 - radioblagon
For the number of lanes
Published on 02/02/11 at 09:31 (This content has been automatically translated from French)USB2 card for the price and number of lanes is no competition
studio and live use
mac dual core
UTILIZATION
stable drivers with Cubase 4
trials in concert with 10 tracks simultaneous recording + live broadcast.
no audible latency.
GETTING STARTED
Very simple installation.
mimic the electrical doc helps.
I have a problem to record mono inputs 2-channel stereo, I do not know if the problem is with Cubase VST driver card or a bug of the manufacturer, the update does not improve the problem .
OVERALL OPINION
Used for 3 months intensively.
knobs are sturdy unlike the previous model US1641.
very good value for money, can do a good job.
I would do without…Read moreUSB2 card for the price and number of lanes is no competition
studio and live use
mac dual core
UTILIZATION
stable drivers with Cubase 4
trials in concert with 10 tracks simultaneous recording + live broadcast.
no audible latency.
GETTING STARTED
Very simple installation.
mimic the electrical doc helps.
I have a problem to record mono inputs 2-channel stereo, I do not know if the problem is with Cubase VST driver card or a bug of the manufacturer, the update does not improve the problem .
OVERALL OPINION
Used for 3 months intensively.
knobs are sturdy unlike the previous model US1641.
very good value for money, can do a good job.
I would do without this choice problem.
See less20