View other reviews for this product:
ricoute « not good at all ....!! »
Published on 03/01/12 at 13:53I will not repeat the description
Solid mahogany body, maple table
micro dble winding up niveaude output
design and type close to the paul standarrd
tune o matic Knight
factory in czech republic
2 volumes and 2 tonalites
UTILIZATION
rather classic handle end
les paul classic form
Surprisingly light weight ....., raising fears of an average density of wood or not a solid body (in room!
access to traditional acute
mic aspect of iridescent grown old and metal parts (mechanical bridge saddle mics not the best effect, to limit rather cheap!!
sound and well .... let's talk about .... because not TERRIBLE
I tried somairement I do not know if this is due to settings (mic set low enough height issue!
I bveaucoup hopes and frankly very disappointed, it should perhaps be expected based on a quite reasonable price
involved, the body is sorely lacking in relief rather clear, but not at all in the mind pauls with rumbling bass, even the vacuum resonance feature did not sound the pauls (I was one compares the pauls epiphone lspecial that it is astonishing and convincing because comparatively speaking Verily in the
his typed his reference, made with a still less subtle and less accuracy!
j "admits great disappointment, and I intend to try again, I tried a epiphone compared to pauls std (dearer too) a priori too much in the spirit of his pauls
test done on a fender blues junior, so a good amp lamp flawless marking
I'm not married to epiphone, and do not know what is the link with the previous Newbie yds, and unless you have the basic comparison and say nothing else tried priori whether, on gibson faded it supplants ( the faded looks better mic, but one body part without table reported e ceptible and mahogany body that make the sound of the famous pauls std faded it surprises me a little!
I intend nonetheless try another model vs. yds and keep abreast of my impressions
SOUNDS
not because I wanted to finally approach the grain of the spirit paf 57, a nd the GRAI lkes paul std, on this point
if there is some clarity but no brightness characteristic or the roaring of the serious pauls not sound fat
So its not typed without the sound quality of a demerit honorable but not ds mind pauls
no sound for me like this model
OVERALL OPINION
I tried it through a test and had come to buy to be honest!!
other models more Epiphone respecting the spirit and especially the sound pauls
(There is a Newbie who prefer the epi sg yds has faded, a sg this is not the one pauls, and after all not a real ear of eco eco faded!
finish rather good, but far less than flattering photos
NERM
subject to move the height of the mics, and try another copy is for now ... a disappointment!!
Solid mahogany body, maple table
micro dble winding up niveaude output
design and type close to the paul standarrd
tune o matic Knight
factory in czech republic
2 volumes and 2 tonalites
UTILIZATION
rather classic handle end
les paul classic form
Surprisingly light weight ....., raising fears of an average density of wood or not a solid body (in room!
access to traditional acute
mic aspect of iridescent grown old and metal parts (mechanical bridge saddle mics not the best effect, to limit rather cheap!!
sound and well .... let's talk about .... because not TERRIBLE
I tried somairement I do not know if this is due to settings (mic set low enough height issue!
I bveaucoup hopes and frankly very disappointed, it should perhaps be expected based on a quite reasonable price
involved, the body is sorely lacking in relief rather clear, but not at all in the mind pauls with rumbling bass, even the vacuum resonance feature did not sound the pauls (I was one compares the pauls epiphone lspecial that it is astonishing and convincing because comparatively speaking Verily in the
his typed his reference, made with a still less subtle and less accuracy!
j "admits great disappointment, and I intend to try again, I tried a epiphone compared to pauls std (dearer too) a priori too much in the spirit of his pauls
test done on a fender blues junior, so a good amp lamp flawless marking
I'm not married to epiphone, and do not know what is the link with the previous Newbie yds, and unless you have the basic comparison and say nothing else tried priori whether, on gibson faded it supplants ( the faded looks better mic, but one body part without table reported e ceptible and mahogany body that make the sound of the famous pauls std faded it surprises me a little!
I intend nonetheless try another model vs. yds and keep abreast of my impressions
SOUNDS
not because I wanted to finally approach the grain of the spirit paf 57, a nd the GRAI lkes paul std, on this point
if there is some clarity but no brightness characteristic or the roaring of the serious pauls not sound fat
So its not typed without the sound quality of a demerit honorable but not ds mind pauls
no sound for me like this model
OVERALL OPINION
I tried it through a test and had come to buy to be honest!!
other models more Epiphone respecting the spirit and especially the sound pauls
(There is a Newbie who prefer the epi sg yds has faded, a sg this is not the one pauls, and after all not a real ear of eco eco faded!
finish rather good, but far less than flattering photos
NERM
subject to move the height of the mics, and try another copy is for now ... a disappointment!!