Static 2 5 4 with dynamic mics for tom and snare mic and a GC for the sound. I focus not on it, I have to break the next chapter. I put 5 because it lacks a micro hi-hat, but There's the required. Roh worse no, you would have taken too much, I'm just swinging against ...

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 2 years. Or rather, I try not to use it for 2 years. Kit cardboard big m **** call it what you want. When I see the note you put it I do not understand ...

Let's be constructive: You pay € 300 in order to have her with a small battery. you put the kick drum mic the snare drum the other, you record and the surprise, the bass drum mic has no bass response, the overhead is unclear at will and sound "distant" with a little color cardboard ... In sound it may be convenient: no need to hire a sub, they serve no purpose once the bottom stagg you save more.

When the tom mics and CC, it's a shame, no dynamics, no presence, staining nearly a filthy, poor transient response, effect of distance again, so short of cardboard that looks like a move.

I tried lots of other model, to the Prodipe DM8 I advise that you will spend cardboard to plastic, it's not bad. But when I hear the kit stagg, I feel like a scam. I feel like Stagg think the ears of his customers are not able to differentiate the m **** gold. Even if you can not sell micro, real, for € 300 (kit micro reasonable battery can quickly costs 700 €), companies are still not allowed to lower the quality of the microphone until there.

Scam, its cardboard hatred against Stagg now, I can buy a kit microphone, my choice was not focused on the stagg. I would do not have that choice. I chose Beta 52A for the gc, SM57 for DC E604 on Tom, Rhode NT5 for OH ...