Biggest Ever Audio Mixing Contest is ON!
I have owned this product since March 2012. This product has-been used with many combinations of PA systems and always (after a quick set up) Performed faultlessly. It has allowed different combinations of speakers to be controlled to end up with a fantastic sound tailored to the music Being Played Rather than a generic top end heavy sound. The ...
Hello, I have a DBX 231 since 2009 and after a little adjustment pushed this week, I just realize a significant hum when I push the treble potentiometers. yes it is a little out of breath but I'm talking about a hum. Is it a pb I from the beginning, I think I will have seen. In short, after reading re...
How long have you been using? But, since 2010. Did you try many other models before buying it? - No, this is the first processor in which I invested. What feature do you like most? - Easy to use. Sound quality in the meeting, good quality connectors and chassie serious. But those prices still...
Bought 3 years ago, I had a pair, I sold one because I use it mainly for the kick. In a config 'studio, I think a 160 is a necessary tool. For a home studio, it gets a little expensive to use very accurate anyway.
the 3BX-DS is the most successful of the series (DS Digital Series). The following model is an expander 4BX uninteresting. So I found this great DBX-3BX I became convinced of the great superiority of multiband compression and looked to have the same thing better (because more recent) that I found with the Focusrite MIXMASTER. <br ...
Machine timeless and cheap! So why deny it, it's simple, it sounds
Used for two weeks of intensive, I find the report QP excellent. (Bought 80 €) I also Joemeeck VC1Q and I prefer the preamp DBX, much more precise.
Used to correct my balance returns or façade. It must work.
I would do this choice: DBX products correspond to my ability and my uses. This is the entry level, but it's still usable.
"Money"