Numark 5000FX user reviews ( 7/10) - 33 user reviews

• 12/16/10

  Audiofanzine FR's review

  Characteristics

  Originally written by Droopy5915 on Audiofanzine FR.
  
  
  
  Rack mixer with optional mounting brackets.
  
  
  
  Master out on XLR and RCA connectors. Three phono inputs and nine line inputs.
  
  Effects processor
  
  
  
  For other features, read the specs sheet

  Utilization

  Easy to use: you don't need to read the manual for the main applications.
  
  
  
  On the other hand, the sampler and loop functions require that you take a look at the manual.
  
  FX processor simple to use.

  Sounds

  The pots and faders generate noise after a few months of use.
  
  The EQ is not impressive, especially the kill function for the lows :S
  
  
  
  Same thing regarding noise: in the beginning, I didn't notice but after few months of use, it's impossible to ignore it.

  Overall Opinion

  I bought it new in 2005. In the beginning, I liked the FX processor with its jog wheel but the effects became boring so I don't use them anymore.
  
  
  
  I already owned two other Numark mixers (DM3050 and DMX09). I tried out Gemini, Technics and Eclerc mixers. Gemini products provide the same quality as Numark. Technics and co. are much better but also more expensive.
  
  
  
  I sold it to buy an Allen&Heath Xone 42. Nice!
  
  
  
  Summary: I was particularly disappointed by the FX processor and the EQ.
  
  
  
  The manufacturing quality is not good enough to withstand years of use.
  
  Based on my experience, I wouldn't buy it again.
  
  
  
  It's better to spend a couple of bucks more for a better mixer to avoid problems after some months of use.
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno

• 09/17/10

  Droopy5915's review ( translated ) Improve this translation " Mixed feelings"

  Characteristics

  Rackable table but the brackets are optional.
  
  
  
  MASTER OUT connectors XLR, RCA, 3 phono, 9 lines
  
  Box effect etc.
  
  
  
  For the rest, see the datasheet.

  Utilization

  Easy to use, no need to open the manual for primary functions.
  
  
  
  However, the function sampler, loops etc. requires a look at the doc.
  
  The box effect is quite simple to use.

  Sounds

  The knobs and faders (including the master) "crack" after a few months of use.
  
  The equalizer is not terrible especially at the bass kills: S
  
  
  
  At the level of breath, like bin at the beginning I did not pay attention but after several months we hear clearly.

  Overall Opinion

  Buy new in 2006, I liked the box effect with the jog at the beginning and then dropping off the effects and ultimately I do not use it anymore.
  
  
  
  I had in my possession two other tables Numark (DM3050 DMX09 and I regret), I tried tables Gemini, Technics, Gemini --- Eclerc same quality after Numark Technics etc ... it's a different budget but the quality is there.
  
  
  
  I just separate myself for Allen & Heath Xone 42: love:
  
  
  
  In summary: I am particularly disappointed with the effects box and equalizer.
  
  
  
  The manufacturing quality is poor with time and use.
  
  Looking back, I will not go that choice.
  
  
  
  It is better to put a little more money in a table better and have no worries with only a few months.
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 11/26/08

  rollyfx's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Characteristics

  On paper it has all the necessary equipment to any beginner who hopes to develop a minimum.
  
  XLR, 5 tracks, effects, ... that you ask for

  Utilization

  It is very easy to take over the side a little too plastic for my taste, but given the price / performance ratio, there is no photo.
  
  
  
  The purchase of this console was for me the transition from the mix console to mix on USB console independently with platinum cd.
  
  
  
  It has good ergonomics and does not open the manual.

  Sounds

  The sound quality is well worth its price can not be compared with a table that costs € 800 or more.

  Overall Opinion

  A table with a good value if you take care enormously.
  
  
  
  It is very semsible to dust!
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 10/07/08

  tiefshwartz's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Characteristics

  Ahhh, the 5000 Fx! while a novice, it will attract the oeuil is a console bling nothing like a gadget packed with a box effect is rather useful, but so badly made that it quickly becomes a feeling of disgust s' use it!

  Utilization

  Usage is rather simple it is being given a table novice, so far so good!

  Sounds

  Ho lalala! I'm going to please the the sound .... is the numark .. no comment. though if I let this one ..... infameau after 2 months faders crack, my HK sizzles finally total. this table is a crap avoid at all costs as always Beringher, reloop, gemini etc ....

  Overall Opinion

  - How long have you use it?
  
  Only two months and it breaks down in my hands REALLY be rotten as the full range of NUMARK Avoid like the plague, by the way I had also left axis 9 a fuck I do not pretend lol! !
  
  
  
  - What is the particular feature you like best and least?
  
  The box has effect c'tait well be with the fader to send if he did not completely fold in two nights!
  
  Now I have an EFX 1000 is better now take effect from a box even if no efx 500 budget
  
  
  
  - Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
  
  AND not that's the problem though and I'll have a table essaiyer mag in 10 minutes will make you not understand that the FX 5000 is a big shit it after some months it loose, that's all the vice of NUMARK, organized theft! even my dealer and he recognizes it stopped selling the brand to have a force feedback from customers who yelled etc ...
  
  
  
  - How do you report qualitprix?
  
  Is theft pure and simple DO NOT BUY THIS TABLE ABOVE IT You let power in the hands .......
  
  
  
  - With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
  
  No way!
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 04/24/08

  )2eds's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Characteristics

  See other reviews
  
  
  
  allechamte on paper must admit the

  Utilization

  Very easy to use, nothing to say, even if you will qques weeks before the well to have on hand (notably to play well with the sampler and effects)

  Sounds

  Transparent? I am not so pro, I know everything quwe c is that after 7 months of use, I have had all my knobs which cracked, the faders, which produced a sal noise when I pushed a little of my mix (sometimes ahead fader only the left speaker works ... or a crack reaches the end), the fader effects that, even when it is at least heard the impact and who also cracked (very annoying when one uses j echo in a precise mix it breaks at all) ...

  Overall Opinion

  I have the mtn derpuis 11 months,
  
  I must admit vrmt much fun to be m ...
  
  
  
  the most: the effects very very good (and respond to another view, the effects are very easy assignable to the microphone! just as for other channels to press the button above the FX channel, a great price caracteristiaue its good for a beautiful table, a JOGL for special effects in the beginning but over time we do not know s the way) BUT ...
  
  
  
  Cons: c is the problem that is a very poor finish, mediocre quality of this mix: great preniers the month and then come the first problem. J have tried a brand whose quality items was subject to controversy and I regret it ...
  
  
  
  j ai before she had a gemini: deception also, I have had the opportunity to mix on a Berhinger ... just as rotten, its posseseur mememe said the choise: Although at the beginning and then comes after the 8 months and it s finished. j I also mix on the djm 600, there is no picture c is the foot. j I also mix in Rodec: no option but to bcp has a real beast of compet ... so many models in short ...
  
  
  
  The value for money: Excellent in the beginning, no one at the end
  
  
  
  with experience, I am sorry for the fan numark not save even a few day to pay me a better quality table that can take a long time: ecler? Pioneer? in allen heath? I do not know but more branded, even if c was a beautiful table that numark ..
  
  
  
  EDIT: For an objective opinion, WAIT 1 YEAR OF USE! if you look at opinion super 5 / 5, it is advice mostly less than 6 months, which will (like me at first) that will then TERRIBLE the first problems ...
  
  
  
  EDIT: voila, I descended again to the final: it is now unusable, all channels are out, sizzle, intersect after a year and about two months of use! Do not Catch Please Numark must clearly make progress in terms of product quality / components! I'm saving for one in allen heath or Rodec, you should do the same!
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 04/13/08

  bbros1's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Characteristics

  I will not go because I think all t say for my part I use it for a year now and I am more than satisfied ..

  Utilization

  The use of effects is instinctive and its usefulness is unprecedented compared my style of mix.

  Sounds

  No default finding the type of cables used forcment is not a critical issue, I saw there was no difference

  Overall Opinion

  A small jewelry brand numark .. I put the highest mark in its report useful and qualitprix especially since the price decline has
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 04/10/08

  nobody140's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Characteristics

  See Advent

  Utilization

  Simple to understand how it works in May Advent Detre efficiency and fast for of the training, why?
  
  g for a sentence of a commentary on this ur my table that I liked and gladly takes over ...
  
  parfoit it would be useful davoir 3 arms ... lol

  Sounds

  Very good quality

  Overall Opinion

  The CHARACTERISTICS already given I spend my view directly.
  
  c on c May not pioneer in a sense it's not what you asked ...
  
  May the Difference is clear fo know what you expect.
  
  I tried the pioneer (the djm 500) c on the output of its pioneer wins one little walk around it is not fragile brief.
  
  I mix depui 6 months with lelectro in evening, a faith I put an amp 3KW output (for an evening of 700 people in party room and the sound is more than adequate my taste, not trs good seed of breath, cheaply and in May the net is that you can do lots of stuff with this table (many very flexible effects and sampler) I havent found in pionner.alor frankly bought this table for a 300 euros I Ocun remake that choice without worry.
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 03/03/08

  dureau26's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Characteristics

  FEATURES
  
  
  
  I'll make you SSAI a quick test and clear on this table that the 4 MRIT vrits
  
  Level equipment and connectivity, this table is trs complte, paramtrique etc ... this practice is effective (especially beginners when it works). This is a brief view to classify parmisles DJM eg ...
  
  Its effect section and many think fast and efficient, but allows a single effect both and no dice ... SO gnrale we must remember that a table is well equipped for the average!
  
  
  
  END PART FEATURES

  Utilization

  Easy and a table similar way to other brand but attention already on the day of purchase I notice a game on the vertical knobs and on the cross, but pa grsillements, but may first dception pass ....

  Sounds

  The sound of the table the purchase is plutt good, satisfactory, at least, not EXAGRES because there are better, much better, a slight breath remaquer not be when you power on the gain, the ualiseur is well thought out but the buttons too big so its slower running, nothing serious.
  
  I do not care about the time for this part ....
  
  Let me hold your attention as the share following is the most important

  Overall Opinion

  [U] It's been two months now and test the table is HS [u]
  
  >>>> At the end of 1.5 weeks of use (trs heals) the cross begins grsiller a cot and then the other ...
  
  >>>> Games on the vertical knobs s'largissent trs and leaves a bad feeling in the finger, (the game is the ...)
  
  >>> Then comes the turn of the box effects, so the effects instantly applies a mini cross, which dphase compltement therefore impossible to apply effects to do, to see off some cases ....
  
  I even managed to break a button on the sampler, he carrment sink into the table, once broken, we can see the quality curantes plastic buttons, I really do not fupport hard to break, yet I lhabitude but it's really crazy!
  
  In short, I bought this table from a reseller 489th Group mach3, who told me that Since it was a good table Designed ... (RN'l valence)
  
  The quality of manufacture of this table is unacceptable and the big problem trs arrive quickly, [u] I would put the point to the fact that my table does being protected very well, no transportation , no smoking, pa water resistant plastic and packing list pousiere not in use! [u]
  
  BRIEF buy this if you thought NUMARK FX5000 forget your project right away, you never will progress with a table that will drop you three times in two movements, and this is true to say thank you and soon! ;-)
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 02/16/08

  dj K-libre 68's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Characteristics

  Features already contained
  
  (5 tracks, effects, sampler ..)

  Utilization

  It took me a while to adapt to know to make use of all functions, but not rocket science, the habit that table is very easy to use
  
  the manual is clear enough to understand all functions (sampler, effects ..)

  Sounds

  Good sound, no breath

  Overall Opinion

  - How long have you use it?
  
  I use this table for two weeks
  
  - What is so special that you like most and least?
  
  what I like most is its box a very effective effects, the sampler
  
  on the other hand I would have liked matrices summons each channel ..
  
  - Have you tried many other models before buying it?
  
  yes, behringer vmx 200 = zero
  
  - How would you rate the quality / price?
  
  very very good, I got a € 459 with the fly
  
  - With experience, you do again this choice?
  
  I do not think I would pass on the pioneer
  
  
  
  UPDATE:
  
  it's been 8 months now I have, I can now better judge this table
  
  at the beginning was fun with, good effects, ergonomic .. but over time it's too hassle, it falls into pieces faders, buttons ...
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 01/05/08

  pvesco's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Characteristics

  I'm not going Retailer description this is a MODEL trs known and others have done before me in this section. Just my opinion user a night in troubleshooting and testing.

  Utilization

  No worries of Use

  Sounds

  No breath, average sound, a little aggressive for the price range

  Overall Opinion

  Cons:
  
  -Connection of power supply only lightweight (making a table ...), plastoc din mount remains in a rack, if you move a lot and disassemble or manipulate the table to make connections, plugs suffer! and sometimes make bad contact (up to the extinction of the table, in full evening it Balot ... on a table almost new)
  
  Ergonomics average progressiv faders too got my all or nothing
  
  Plastoc-look and feel and lightweight, like connectors printing fragility has a privilgier instalation or you do not touch the connections ...
  
  -No effect on the micro (within failing pig operation)
  
  the most:
  
  -Number of entries, posibilit change the type of
  
  Between micro-correct, equalizers correct, the effects have him correct, I had little time to test them, I prfre nanmoins from the gnrer of a platinum cd
  
  Given this exprience it seemed to me to use an imitation of Pioneer, so the limit, I prfre a Pioneer of opportunity for the same price (I also test the Pioneer). .. at least she will not suffer to be dplace or unplug. Before, I used a silent Excutiveaudio which was better and less "fake", I tried it for a possible purchase in main table, purchase that I would not ...
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno

• Page: 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 
•