QSC RMX 2450 user reviews ( 7/10) - 17 user reviews

• 11/16/12

  sw80's review "tough as nails"

  Overall Opinion

  The RMX 2450 is in my opinion the best amp that QSC makes. It is also one of the higher priced models that they have. I remember using this amp back in 2007, we had a few of them for our group because we needed something to push power to our subs and speakers. The RMX 2450 worked great for us at the time. I loved the way it made our bass sound, it made it big and pushed it all the way across the club we were in.
  
  This amp is a 2 channel amps with 2 XLR inputs and 2 outputs. It can be racked and will take up 2 rack spaces. This amp has a nice weight to it, it weighs about 50 pounds. It is made out of heavy material with metal casting. It will last you a long time, if we didn’t sell ours I am 100 percent sure that it would still be holding up and working to this day about 6 years later. This amp is a Class H amp with 2 750 watts at 4 ohms and 2 500 watts at 8 ohms. You will have all of the power you need to push your bass subs to the full potential and get your sound to stay crisp and clean. This amp is very quiet and does not generate any noise while using it but it does get kind of hot if you are using it for long periods of time. We have had ours on for over 10 hours and the top and bottom of this amp would be burning after we are done. But the unit never burnt out on us or anything so it never really cause any concerns. If you want an amp with power and will last you a long time than the RMX 2450 could be the best choice, even though it has been out for years it is still a great amp to have for your set up.
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno

• 06/11/12

  DJ V-Style's review ( translated ) Improve this translation " Excellent quality / price ratio"

  Overall Opinion

  I use this amp for over a month, this is my second amp QSC RMX. I buy it because the other was no longer powerful enough for my speakers (I need two times 500 W RMS into 8 ohms)
  
  These models are extremely robust. These are legacy amp and that is why their price is quite reasonable, and it gives us that advantage because older generation does not mean lower quality, on the contrary, apart from its weight It is full of indisputable advantages: the sound is very satisfying, the components are quality and manufacture of amplifier has the reputation of faithful QSC: Workhorse.
  
  
  
  I made this choice already twice, and in this price range I would do without hesitation. But to raise the budget more, it is better to move towards higher models like the PLX.
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 03/25/12

  pulvonium's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Overall Opinion

  I use this amp for four years in concert "with sound-self"
  
  With, I pushed the head, returns, and he even served as a bass amp.
  
  I've never found wanting.
  
  It is heavy, but is perfect for my use, the power I need, and (this does not spoil anything) is easily found secondhand for not too expensive. One more day where we seek to expand its fleet of equipment ...
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 11/08/11

  kohort's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Overall Opinion

  How long have you use it?
  
  Since 2005
  
  
  
  Have you tried many other models before buying it?
  
  Yes a lot ...
  
  
  
  What is so special that you love the most, least?
  
  + Very good driver for small satellites or subwoofers (15 ")
  
  - A little bit just to move correctly 18 "but not for. A 9001 Crest or Crown VZ3600 will be much more appropriate in this case.
  
  
  
  How would you rate the quality / price?
  
  Quite good.
  
  
  
  With experience, you do again this choice?
  
  Yes, without hesitation.
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 11/06/11

  brikabrak's review ( translated ) Improve this translation " good"

  Overall Opinion

  We have 3 at work and I have two for several years, and no worries.
  
  I have mounted in various institutions, and also, no problem.
  
  
  
  Perfect for heads, but just for a few subs.
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 08/31/11

  dj charle jean's review ( translated ) Improve this translation " A monster!"

  Overall Opinion

  I use it for several months.
  
  
  
  Yes Bravy a very low-end merdik!
  
  
  
  Most: sound quality of course when I'm used to the sound merdik when there is a QSC RMX 2450 is the 518th's change believe me! warmer more péchut less garish! is setting behind the Pro Connection! In any case I can not do a clipper! button on the gain precise feel good the notches.
  
  
  
  The less body weight is a flycase with the amp in over this, this, this and that it quickly becomes heavy! I even feel that it is heavier than the subwoofer yet there are only 45 kilos.
  
  
  
  Considering the price that I pay I can say is that I am very pleased a good amp for the entry level.
  
  
  
  I think Qsc is unstoppable and I intend to keep it a decade or so I remain faithful to the brand so yes!
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 08/11/11

  ecce48's review ( translated ) Improve this translation " Poor !!!!!"

  Overall Opinion

  I bought it nine months ago. I use a good vieu United States in 1300 on the sub and I was told it would be nice to replace it even though it still works perfectly. I would not say disappointed!! Pushed too far into 4 ohms, it's heating, low equalized at nothing, that clip ... Finally, it was a bad plan and I reconnect the United States. Not letting me down, I try it on the media instead of the Mackie FRS 1700, it's just as well. On the same frequency I compare it to the crown MT 1200, still disappointed!! result would have been better to put some euros more (barely) to make a PLX.
  
  That said and despite all the pain I have said, it's not a bad amp, I think the amp is versatile and will suit a excelence by many amateur ... But not for me, next time I will make my way to the PLX. It is worth its price but not more and more, the Mackie was a bit cheaper.
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 06/02/10

  pushthebutton's review ( translated ) Improve this translation " Very good amp. reliable, robust and cheap enough"

  Overall Opinion

  For how long have you been using it?
  
  
  
  I use it all for 1 year battery. It comes out too often, 1-2 times per month.
  
  Did you try many other models before getting this one?
  
  
  
  I tried a few: I have a QSC Rmx1850HD also, I also owned the Stage Line, DAP and JB ...
  
  I've just played in a company that amplifies its KIND and sub in for some top rmx2450 QSC (FCR art500).
  
  What thing do you like most/least about it?
  
  
  
  +: Price, quality sound output, design, ... IN CRE is missible
  
  -: It takes so I always put the weight (20.2kg) and he sometimes fast clipper.
  
  What is your opinion about the value for the price?
  
  
  
  Simply brilliant!
  
  Knowing what you know now, would you make the same choice?
  
  
  
  Yes without hesitation. I separated from my family just because he is not powerful enough for my boxes if I'd keep.
  
  The amp is really good. Especially when I got it I did not have much experience with good brands but now I'm working on the Kind, QSC, Crown, etc, is something else.
  
  They may say that it is the entry level of QSC I find this amp great. I also sell at cons heart.
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 03/09/08

  Djetasvp's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Overall Opinion

  I use Ben Deou prs three years bought new 695 euros in France projector shop for those who might be interested that price.
  
  I use them with my pair of speakers and it works nsx tr3 bton.bien my tr3 can suporte but hey more power to buy the same plx gnration must ante up first, but works pretty good the coallition well no worries.
  
  I tried several models but need in. rflchir 50 years because the brand I wanted this but I admit some hesitation with a m inter m2000 because I possess an inter dja m m1000 and I did not know in. the promotion because of my QSC I saw more alantours of 1000 euros and I shut supra enjoyable when my supplier I shared this promo durable so I have no po hsit 50.
  
  I recommend it as an amp of this size that price I say thank you QSC.
  
  With the experience I would do as much without any hsitation except to buy a power or plx soft.NO JOKE OF COURSE I would be a waste of money. I will put 10 put j admits he is quite heavy but good as the rest of the stuff so it stays on FDMA wavelength.

  N / A

  N / A

  N / A
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 02/10/08

  merri-val's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Overall Opinion

  Superb amp, I use two 4050 and 2450 a 4 years since 1450
  
  these amps have the PCHE, good quality sound and does not move even when clipe for hours (all without chauffle only problem is the weight of this set lorsq'il is in his fly.
  
  trs good protection of the speakers (I had before the cler and the Sphynx, there's no photo)
  
  trs good report quality price and good resale trs
  
  With the exprience I take up some of this rmx especially for bass, but would take for the rest of pl2 (more lightweight, better sound quality, but many high)

  N / A

  N / A

  N / A
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno

• Page: 1
• 2
• 
•