User reviews: Ultrasone PRO 900

12/09/11

spokito's review ( translated ) Improve this translation " Trs well"

I use it now for two weeks.

I had an old sony open, low-quality front.

All the people who say it is an analytical trs headphone are right.

I test again:

trs comfortable, we ended up forgetting about his ears. Closed you can add a little snare drum in the headphone while playing cot drummer, and out of not having repeated ear whistling.

I test to mix:

I wrote a song mix and master this headset only, your exact comfort me in the ide as c'tait a good headphone if you have not studio monitors high-end. I've got the Fostex PM-0.5 mkII and I had a better rsultat by mixing with headphones that I used products.

Personally, I like the sound and comfort of this headset. One small regret, they deliver it with a cable twist, jack and a 6.35 cable jack right 3.25. The jacks are screwed to the headset. They should have to provide an extension plutt two cables.

Ct report quality price, I can not say whether it is the cart with the price rputs Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro. I do not think I put a 400 but trs attractive prices on Ebay (280 new) made me take the plunge.

This is a purchase "a life" so yes I think I'm doing the right thing.

Did you find this review helpful?yes no

08/10/11

EPSIL@N's review ( translated ) Improve this translation " Awesome!"

Overall Opinion

To replace a Bose passed away, I decided to invest in a good headset for monitoring and listening.

I looked at the Ultrasound Pro 900.

On the one hand the product is high quality, comes with many accessories, the mini jack is screwed into the headphone which is a very good thing.

Since this headset is closed once the ears are really out of touch, finally I'm exaggerating, just means that surrounds us but it's really a very good point in that direction.

The value for money is good given the finishes and especially the sound!

And there I must admit that I was really pleasantly surprised, surprised by the first low, deep and well defined, sub-bass are the game and it is a treat!

The rest is as good, medium and treble are well developed.

In short, this headset is a killer and I am fully satisfied!

I rediscovered Angel by Massive Attack with!

Some told me about his process S-Logic, which provides a front stereo image, but I have not really thought it was obvious even if the field of stereo headphones are excellent!

Did you find this review helpful?yes no

07/20/11

steflor's review ( translated ) Improve this translation " headphone and goggles ....!"

Overall Opinion

I will not go too much on the qualities of this headset.

First because I have not tried them all!

In any case, it is perfect for what I expected.

Bass that actually exist, I mean, it's like having a good subwoofer between the ears. Not too much, just "reality".

Spatial positioning but also a very interesting, really more to the head than most other headphones. Not as much to a pair of monitors, but almost. immediate results: my mixes are largely better with this headset with my monitors (Prodipe 8). I know, do mix with headphones .... yes, in a professional studio where everything is optimal!

But I bring this contribution especially to say this, something I discovered by accident and never read anywhere.

I wear glasses ... modern (!), The branches very fine.

But of course, arises over the headphone, and thus deviates from the ears, 1mm or two perhaps, very little.

Very few ... but very important! With my glasses, the bass is less present, hence my surprise at my first mix played on other media, too loaded low (very low, 60hz and below).

Also, by positioning the branches of my glasses on top of the headphone, problem solved.

So the positioning of the headphone (and maybe others?) Seems crucial.

If you too are concerned, I am curious to know if you have had the same experience.

Did you find this review helpful?yes no

04/23/11

AlexT's review ( translated ) Improve this translation " It's all good!"

Overall Opinion

I use this headset for 9 months for the composition / mix (20%) and listening (80%). My old headphone is a Philips HBC910 as far to say that I made the leap. Naturally, the PRO 900 outclasses even let up on the HBC910 both ways. Given the price difference is not surprising.

The manufacturing quality is the RDV, plastics inspiring confidence, 2 cords (1 + 1 twisted right) tip 3.5 jack screw on a headphone. Joints for folding and storage in appropriate box (most of south wind after a few tweaks my Tenori-on as it goes, two in one!), Very convenient! I travel a lot, I love it!

I had the opportunity to compare it with Sony headphones in the range of 150 € (sorry, I can not remember the ref. Qlq.chose MDR ...). Low PRO 900 are much more spare, identifiable, clear as those made by Sony, which seemed to be a mix between low and high frequencies. At medium, I should not have fine enough or the ear piece was not suitable. Regarding the acute, PRO 900 was clearer, more percussive. Across the spectrum PRO 900 seemed more detailed, detaching the sound of each other.

In conclusion, PRO 900 is a pair of cheap but quality, comfortable, convenient and providing (the record of my ears) listening analytically quite usable and appropriate to the composition or mix.

I remake this choice, yeah, sure!

Did you find this review helpful?yes no

12/29/10

raf's review ( translated ) Improve this translation " Excellent"

Overall Opinion

* S-Logic ™ Natural Surround Sound Plus

* Principle Dynamic, closed

* Frequency range from 6 to 42.000 Hz

* Impedance 40 Ohm

* Sound pressure level 96 dB

* MU Metal bufferboard, Reduced emissions in field shall conduct free ULE (Ultra Low Emission) standard

* Driver 40 mm titanium-plated

* Weight 295g (without cord)

Purchased some ten days running almost 24/24 so about 70 hours

and already the sound has really changed from the early low level that are more round

Spatialization is impressive from the beginning but I knew already because I have an ultrasound Pro 2500 for 5 years

bandwidth from 6 to 42 real

Compared to other brands like Sony, which announced 7509HD 5-80 um I say that low down to 100 max and again (for me it's a cardboard headphone stereo very poor low nonexistent)

Here the entire spectrum is present and the lack of bass and treble a bit garish medium sometimes on 2500 (open face headphone) was corrected

This headset allows the bass not always obvious in a home studio (I have Dynaudio BM5A)

The RPIX is certainly a little expensive but rather than buy several headphones at 200 euros it is worth buying one of the departure

I would do without hesitation that choice but I have for years it is no longer guaranteed 5 years and handmade in Germany and not in Asia as most headphones on the market

Did you find this review helpful?yes no

08/03/10

guilhem09's review ( translated ) Improve this translation " Good stuff"

Overall Opinion

Used for four months for the composition and the mix late ...

Its wicked, really nothing to say! Deep bass, clear highs without being shrill. Super ... Spatialization is bluffing.

Perfect comfort, even if it is hot in a closed, we keep easily on the ears.

It is certainly expensive, but as an investment that does not lapses over the years ...

Did you find this review helpful?yes no

10/23/09

mhch's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

Overall Opinion

Here is a month since I bought this headphone and I'm still amazed at all of music dtails agree. The bass is deep and detailed, but clear and without overload, the major extreme is the same as with the prsence. the rest of the spectrum is also trs prcis and Submitted. Spatialization remarkable.

The sound isolation is excellent, I can not hear the speakers when I put the headphone, and I hear only my nylon guitar (probably the only remaining physical contact transmission) when I record, which allows me to hear the sound as it is recorded.

I tried the 7506 and beyerdynamic high-end purchase, and the ultrasound 550. And I thought they were excessive, even screaming at times, compared to one that is neutral and prcis all frequencies.

Compar my powered speakers TBS2a PMC, also remarkable, the only diffrence resident in the extreme serious on this headphone, and digs deeper, it would take a normal subwoofer to go down so low, and felt that the spatialization: the instruments seem RSID lgrement more "up" in space, but is also the spatial prcise.

I prfre far these headphones my speakers when I DSIR to focus on the bass line costs, such as transcription, then they are clear and easy to hear trs.

The finish is remarkable, for example, the cable jack is fixed APRS insert that screws, two cables one twisted the other not (I prfre), and adapter jack 6mm - 3.5 mm.

I do not know what I like least!

While the price is lev but the quality is at the appointment, and finally it is cheaper than a subwoofer or speakers high end. I will say it even possible to measure the quality of its speakers. Thank you my God PMC bear comparison, unless of course serious in the extreme.

I do it again this choice without hsiter.

Did you find this review helpful?yes no

05/22/09

Dj William WiLD's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

Overall Opinion

I have a few days ago, so still running ... (I'm still listening level has a lightweight in terms of power)

What I like most the prcison the spacialisation Systm of ultrasound, low Submitted just enough ... nikel to compose and pre-mix without too much surprise by switching on my monitors DYNAUDIO ...

Yes 7509HD Sony, AKG, Beyer, and PRO 2500 (trs trs is good too ... but open a little boring if the world was doing something else ... ct or night if your CHRIE not sleep away ... LOL)

The report QualitPrix: Well then let's say for my part I looked for "EC" headphone long ago, the 2500 pro suited me but open ... so I opt for a closed then I really took a slap on the PRO 2500, for my part it was a musical exprience because I had never heard of the headphone as spacialisation ... it is immersed in the sound which helps me in the composition and the pre-mix ... really! so I'll say I invest! especially since I put it weaker than other headphones so in the end it's my ears thank ULTRASONE sr! and then the Ultrasone Edition 8 is really above my means! pfff ouaaaaaaaaaaa 1150 euros is a heart attack!

The report qualitprix excellent for me ... (Aesthetics is more sober, hard carrying case, two cables and two atria supplmentaires: COOL but it is only more ...)

With exprience oh yes, but I would hear by just 8 EDITION curiosities!

N / A

Did you find this review helpful?yes no

03/25/09

David-Paul's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

Overall Opinion

This is a headset that uses a technology called S-Logic Owner '+ which is not to send the sound directly into the ear canal, but to enjoy the reverberations of the pavilion. This results in a relatively efficient spatialization. A CD is supplied that is probably used for grinding. Listening to the CD eyeful, but there is virtually as scenic phase, giving a 3D feel, but not on this headphone!

Time of use:

I received yesterday, it is still a little break, but I have begun to appreciate the quality.

Features and less apprcies apprcies:

Cot positive, the first of his precision and a remarkable spacialisation. The headphone looks pretty solid, and it comes with many accessories (semi-rigid cover that allows you to store everything in compartments, two cords, adapter jack 6.35-> 3.5 jack, two sets of foam, a CD that must take place CD running) He shakes the head well. For cons, the proprietary technology means that if you put the headphone backwards (left to right and right to left), the sound is high frequency impoverishment. It should also be careful to put the headphones (my ears are smaller than the internal space of the atria, I have to adjust to find the right position, but once well put, it's good)

Other models known

I also tried other headphones, and Numark prodipe, I know enough about the K240 and K401 models from AKG, and Sony MDR models 7506 and 7509.

I compared to 7509.

Nieau to the cost, the 7509 seems much more medium, after comparison, I would say that the sounds seem closer to the tape medium, compared, it appears from a pro 900 print width of frequencies, and stereo width of space also. The sounds seem more distinct from each other. Low frequencies give the impression of being much more present, the bass drums have low impact in the low growl, a 40 hz means EQUAL. What seems strange is that the bass seems more present and less occulting vis a vis the rest of her as the 7509. on the other hand, the sound seems drier, less rich medium, which initially surprised. After listening further, maybe the sound is altogether more natural, the voices are faithful, you feel the vibrations of the details of saxes synths.

The subjective approach being one thing, I then pass a test that I like to do, monitoring of singing. It receives more details singing, the more we come to adequately control the song. I once did this test with a Numark (vocals slightly wrong) the two AKG (vocals correct but hesitant) and 7509 which was at the time my best headphones (he got away with flying colors during the test, I leaving the feeling of precise control of the song). The Pro 900 also is doing extremely well, leaving me feeling even a finer control over the votes of head not necessarily obvious to control it.

Quality price ratio

What is it expensive! While ...

but what is it good! Lol

I truly believe that this is a good headphone. It provides both a quality vis a vis the bandwidth and space stereo, although at first it divert a little on this point (the extremes seem spacialisation go outside of the headphone). It is totally DIFFERENT from 7509, much less medium, unable to say whether the bandwidth is more or less flat as this.

Repeat this choice

Yes, I would do, but I hope to keep it long enough for me not having to ask

N / A

Did you find this review helpful?yes no

Ultrasone PRO 900

Ultrasone PRO 900 user reviews ( 9/10) - 9 user reviews