Acoustimass 5 Serie II classified ad
Alerte nouvelle annonceImages
Reviews
4.0/5(3 reviews)
67 %
33 %
Write a user review
loll06Published on 10/04/07 at 02:42 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
"Alli IDAL a pair of 901"
If your amp watts provide real is what you need.
10 Cms in high ca 200 real watts does it well.
It can meet any kind of listener
Bose invented the solution to the problem "my pice acoustics limit and I have no place to put the columns of the two cots distance itch ...
Purists will tell you out of the stro nothing.
For over 6 years I have only the bose, and I would say the figure is stro why should it be seated between her image to hear a speaker balance.
Try the bose is believing!!
If your amp watts provide real is what you need.
10 Cms in high ca 200 real watts does it well.
It can meet any kind of listener
Bose invented the solution to the problem "my pice acoustics limit and I have no place to put the columns of the two cots distance itch ...
Purists will tell you out of the stro nothing.
For over 6 years I have only the bose, and I would say the figure is stro why should it be seated between her image to hear a speaker balance.
Try the bose is believing!!
11
»
alcoolsPublished on 03/04/09 at 04:51 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
I used these speakers in a showroom of 250 m2 and in this use, the side "well distributed" is very interesting.
However, I tested my home and my columns in comparison to JBL (2 woofer, a midrange and a tweeter, speakers purchased 15 years ago about 350-400 euro per pair) the sound really sucks. Yet I have tried several styles of music (Jamiroquai, the rock genre vieu Bob Seger, the Daft Punk, the Air) and in all cases of figure, my modest JBL sounded better: On my JBL, more body, bass deeper and more striking (though I thought that on this point would Boses the top, but far from it), his best defined in the midrange and treble. My JBL directives are actually more but the obvious loss...…
However, I tested my home and my columns in comparison to JBL (2 woofer, a midrange and a tweeter, speakers purchased 15 years ago about 350-400 euro per pair) the sound really sucks. Yet I have tried several styles of music (Jamiroquai, the rock genre vieu Bob Seger, the Daft Punk, the Air) and in all cases of figure, my modest JBL sounded better: On my JBL, more body, bass deeper and more striking (though I thought that on this point would Boses the top, but far from it), his best defined in the midrange and treble. My JBL directives are actually more but the obvious loss...…
Read more
I used these speakers in a showroom of 250 m2 and in this use, the side "well distributed" is very interesting.
However, I tested my home and my columns in comparison to JBL (2 woofer, a midrange and a tweeter, speakers purchased 15 years ago about 350-400 euro per pair) the sound really sucks. Yet I have tried several styles of music (Jamiroquai, the rock genre vieu Bob Seger, the Daft Punk, the Air) and in all cases of figure, my modest JBL sounded better: On my JBL, more body, bass deeper and more striking (though I thought that on this point would Boses the top, but far from it), his best defined in the midrange and treble. My JBL directives are actually more but the obvious loss of sound quality was not an option.
So, apart for a small room music well distributed (handy for a dinner for example, or in a store), I strongly recommend these speakers. I put 3 / 10 for his interest in the store (but it's worth no more than one for listening quality).
Note that I am not part of the "clan anti-Bose" just because I use this brand in my band, but with products for semi-pro (Bose L1).
However, I tested my home and my columns in comparison to JBL (2 woofer, a midrange and a tweeter, speakers purchased 15 years ago about 350-400 euro per pair) the sound really sucks. Yet I have tried several styles of music (Jamiroquai, the rock genre vieu Bob Seger, the Daft Punk, the Air) and in all cases of figure, my modest JBL sounded better: On my JBL, more body, bass deeper and more striking (though I thought that on this point would Boses the top, but far from it), his best defined in the midrange and treble. My JBL directives are actually more but the obvious loss of sound quality was not an option.
So, apart for a small room music well distributed (handy for a dinner for example, or in a store), I strongly recommend these speakers. I put 3 / 10 for his interest in the store (but it's worth no more than one for listening quality).
Note that I am not part of the "clan anti-Bose" just because I use this brand in my band, but with products for semi-pro (Bose L1).
See less
11
»
_Chris_Published on 04/05/09 at 07:27 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
I use this system for about 4 years, I bought OCCAZ, it must be 15 years ...
Bose has invented what is pompously called the "2.1", the fact is that very point.
There will always be people who say that the sound is distorted, that lack of media, but in any case the report made / size is incredible. One has the impression that the bass comes from these tiny speakers ...
In summary, a very compact system that will please his lady and a great bass with the neighbors to yell. The acoustimass 5 series 2 even more of a respectable age, is still compares favorably with other systems 2.1 that is now on the market. And looking on the box, yes there is only one hole, not a basic bass-reflex...…
Bose has invented what is pompously called the "2.1", the fact is that very point.
There will always be people who say that the sound is distorted, that lack of media, but in any case the report made / size is incredible. One has the impression that the bass comes from these tiny speakers ...
In summary, a very compact system that will please his lady and a great bass with the neighbors to yell. The acoustimass 5 series 2 even more of a respectable age, is still compares favorably with other systems 2.1 that is now on the market. And looking on the box, yes there is only one hole, not a basic bass-reflex...…
Read more
I use this system for about 4 years, I bought OCCAZ, it must be 15 years ...
Bose has invented what is pompously called the "2.1", the fact is that very point.
There will always be people who say that the sound is distorted, that lack of media, but in any case the report made / size is incredible. One has the impression that the bass comes from these tiny speakers ...
In summary, a very compact system that will please his lady and a great bass with the neighbors to yell. The acoustimass 5 series 2 even more of a respectable age, is still compares favorably with other systems 2.1 that is now on the market. And looking on the box, yes there is only one hole, not a basic bass-reflex ...
Bose has invented what is pompously called the "2.1", the fact is that very point.
There will always be people who say that the sound is distorted, that lack of media, but in any case the report made / size is incredible. One has the impression that the bass comes from these tiny speakers ...
In summary, a very compact system that will please his lady and a great bass with the neighbors to yell. The acoustimass 5 series 2 even more of a respectable age, is still compares favorably with other systems 2.1 that is now on the market. And looking on the box, yes there is only one hole, not a basic bass-reflex ...
See less
20
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Bose
- Model: Acoustimass 5 Serie II
- Category: Hi-Fi Speakers
- Added in our database on: 06/09/2005
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Manuals and other files
Other categories in Hi-Fi
Other names: acoustimass 5 serieii, acoustimass5serieii, acoustimass5 serieii, acoustimass5 serie ii, acoustimass 5serie ii, acoustimass 5 serie ii, acoustimass 5 serie 2, acoustimass5serie ii, acoustimass5 serie ii, acoustimass5 serie 2, acoustimass 5serie ii, acoustimass 5serie 2