View other reviews for this product:
jycom « Good big sound »
Published on 12/16/11 at 07:46- How long have you use it?
> I use the M50 for a little over a year. I had the excellent little Prcdemment ATH-M35 (ATH-M30 is a foldable) is, however, back from the M50
- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
> Yes, Shure SRH range, Sennheiser HD25, the AKG and the ATH-M35
- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
> Assets: a banana patient without any distortion, low doses just beautiful music for the massive electronic rhythms, in the high precision
> Cons: an indispensable requirement for running-in phase during the hours of Premire costs; for a MUCH acoustic, jazz or classical, an open headphone is my opinion more appropriate than this one which is closed br />
- How do you report qualitprix?
> A report absolutely excellent, there is no equivalent on the plant. headphones have over 300 euros that behave.
- With the exprience, you do again this choice?
> Yes hsitation no. I expect a successor as the M50 of 2007 but how could we do better?
> I use the M50 for a little over a year. I had the excellent little Prcdemment ATH-M35 (ATH-M30 is a foldable) is, however, back from the M50
- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
> Yes, Shure SRH range, Sennheiser HD25, the AKG and the ATH-M35
- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
> Assets: a banana patient without any distortion, low doses just beautiful music for the massive electronic rhythms, in the high precision
> Cons: an indispensable requirement for running-in phase during the hours of Premire costs; for a MUCH acoustic, jazz or classical, an open headphone is my opinion more appropriate than this one which is closed br />
- How do you report qualitprix?
> A report absolutely excellent, there is no equivalent on the plant. headphones have over 300 euros that behave.
- With the exprience, you do again this choice?
> Yes hsitation no. I expect a successor as the M50 of 2007 but how could we do better?