Not satisfied with those reviews?
Filter
Our members also liked:
4.9/5(7 reviews)
86 %
14 %
Write a user review
Users reviews
kykylekillerSuperb advice I
Published on 02/10/13 at 10:19 (This content has been automatically translated from French)Hello;
I has this little plate for 1 month
First I had so much Numark TT1650 say nothing to see!
+: The couple, the chassis stable and heavy, the style, the arms and everything ..
-: A hand that ca do heavy (18kg) but hey ..
It's a bit expensive new but used is affordable especially for the quality that is top of the range!
With more experience I would do exactly the same choice is really a very good turntable phew!10
stellyannI recommend!
Published on 02/04/13 at 01:20 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I used it for 2 years before moving to the technics 1210 M3d.
Very good turntable with a good arm that holds the scratch.J 'had a cell shure m-44 and the sound was very good for qualité.Mon only worry was on LIVE on stage! RUMBLE I could and I was many disabled! That's why I changed my turntables.
The value for money is more than better and I think this is the Techncis is not justified (although very good turntable).
If I did that scratch and mix studio, I repeat again ...10
badboysdu38My favorite, the best market
Published on 07/04/12 at 14:31 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use it for 6 years and they have not a single wrinkle snuff.
I have 2 CDJ 1000 and 2 Numark TTX and yet I keep coming back to my Stantons 150 because those are by far the best. They go like clockwork even after 6 years of use and scratch, they have a couple of crazy (even more impressive than the TTX or the MK2) to scratch the top.
What I like most about this deck:
- The torque of madness
- The perfect finish to any standard
- Its connectivity: no need for the ground wire as on MK2, then plug in the old forgotten Line phono connection!
- The duration of life, platinum indestructible compared to TTX
What I like least:
- As mentioned in a previous comment "power button" t…Read moreI use it for 6 years and they have not a single wrinkle snuff.
I have 2 CDJ 1000 and 2 Numark TTX and yet I keep coming back to my Stantons 150 because those are by far the best. They go like clockwork even after 6 years of use and scratch, they have a couple of crazy (even more impressive than the TTX or the MK2) to scratch the top.
What I like most about this deck:
- The torque of madness
- The perfect finish to any standard
- Its connectivity: no need for the ground wire as on MK2, then plug in the old forgotten Line phono connection!
- The duration of life, platinum indestructible compared to TTX
What I like least:
- As mentioned in a previous comment "power button" that is not very well placed
- The weight because it is really heavy compared to TTX if I may compare yet, but the justification is in the frame (steel)
The value for money is great because for the same price as Numark TTX or Technics MK2 you have a much better deck, a view of the finish, engine torque and the duration of life (when compared to a numark).
I would do without free choice, these frames are simply perfect, I do not understand also why people have so much enthusiasm for MK2 Technics or Numark TTX while we here in a product that has nothing to envy them, believe me, it's been 10 years since I mix and I have nothing better to date, if you scratch, throw yourself on it!See less30- BOOWEL34.7
After teknics there is no better (personal opinion)
Published on 04/07/12 at 01:21 (This content has been automatically translated from French)2 years
yes 5 or 6 pairs of different brands BST numark belt and direct drive
positive characteristic: no sensation passing from - to +
negative feature: no protective cover
very good QPR
with a new choice I contains the same20 
OSRgood product
Published on 01/25/12 at 08:56 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use 5 years sinc
never had a problem!
it gives me the best turntable on the market that there
I have tried many different makes and models throughout the evening but it will remain the best for me
the set is heavy unlike the technique M5G
I do it again without hesitation that choice only 1 second10- DJ Zemant
Perfect
Published on 10/20/11 at 17:25 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I use it for 9 months
Numark CDX, HDX, Technics SL 1200, cdj 100 mk3
+ Pitch, motor torque
- The location of the switch, my plates are positioned to the scratch (arms up) thus not possible to paste the table with the plate (see photo)
It was worth every penny, better than the Technics to less expensive
Unhesitatingly00 
HaarpPublished on 01/16/09 at 04:36 (This content has been automatically translated from French)For how long have you been using it?
I use these plates for 1 year
What is the specific feature you like best, the least?
+ It works very well, really powerful engine torque, specific on pitch, she is strong / rugged. I love it!
- The weight ... apse, but the quality is good
Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
Before purchasing this table I was mixing on Numark TT1650 So yeah there is a very big difference. The gas sold them to me at a period mixai on technics mk2 and he told me it silent as well.
How do you report qualitprix?
I've had a pair of OCCAZ 600euro. the price is very reasonable nine.
With exprience, you do again this election?
Yaaaaaaa !!!!!Read moreFor how long have you been using it?
I use these plates for 1 year
What is the specific feature you like best, the least?
+ It works very well, really powerful engine torque, specific on pitch, she is strong / rugged. I love it!
- The weight ... apse, but the quality is good
Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
Before purchasing this table I was mixing on Numark TT1650 So yeah there is a very big difference. The gas sold them to me at a period mixai on technics mk2 and he told me it silent as well.
How do you report qualitprix?
I've had a pair of OCCAZ 600euro. the price is very reasonable nine.
With exprience, you do again this election?
Yaaaaaaa !!!!!See less20