Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Edirol UR-80 reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Edirol UR-80
Images
1/18
Zval Zval
Published on 02/22/06 at 17:23
Value For Money : Excellent
See above

UTILIZATION

No problem for installation, compatible with all apps that I used currently.

For cons, the control surface is configured for boring trs softs less ambitious. It is really basic paramtre for Cubase, ProTools and other ...

The manual ... frankly, there's really much more boring but there's even more explicit when

GETTING STARTED

There are two big problems with c'te machine:

The first is that there is no possibility to use the 96khz in rerecording, which in-home studio, is frankly a handicap if you want to have an acceptable quality of his.

The deuxime, I knew that by buying it, is the non-motorized faders ... I dropped the case, I find my good old mouse automation, so it galre ... Unless the Russians the first draft. Anyway ...

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for more than 2 years, despite my Previous criticism has remained a product of quality and a good value qualitprix trs.

I would say its main default are non-motorized faders, the 96khz used very little in this case prcis, and ... the pre-amps that are not really transparent.

The quality of c'te machine are its compatibility (audio), the transport section (really useful), and that it impresses the girls to see a machine with a few buttons and faders ... j'dconne. There's still stuff frankly useful and well made (see the Technical Specifications for this), and especially its price.