Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Line 6 TonePort UX1 reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Line 6 TonePort UX1
Images
1/172
Line 6 TonePort UX1

USB audio interface from Line 6 belonging to the TonePort series

ropongi ropongi
Published on 08/14/09 at 10:00
Value For Money : Poor
What technical specifications motivated your choice? For what purpose? What is your config (motherboard / CPU / Ram / Hard ,...)? Which instruments or Systmes (console, prampli, DtDs ...) you use the connection and how? * ...
Using Toneport GX as a result of the need XLR connections. Choice motivated by price in nice gear for the USB 2.0 and amp simulations dj known by the GX, sufficient in my beginners computer music for models of cool.

My computer is a portablePackardBell rcent, 3 GB RAM, Intel pentium proc dual-core. Utiliss instruments: Hohner L75 Lespaul, Ibanez ATK 300, recorded with Shure SM 58 for vocals.

UTILIZATION

The drivers are stable? Are they often put day? What software do you use most often? What latency you get and how many tracks you get record / playback simultanment? * ...

Drivers: no worries, installation of road gearbox.
Software: Acid Pro above, and Ableton. Freesoft test with Kristal and Audacity.

Tracks a registered one, not tried pluysieurs time. Tracks played: in a trouble-free package Acid.
Correct latency, not far, but has not Corchi my ears!

GETTING STARTED

Installation is no problem it? Have you experienced any incompatibility? Gnrale The configuration is easy? The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
Trouble-free installation, XP (old pc) and Vista. No incompatibility including OS (tested on Mac).

The hardware config is simple: two volume knobs and gnral mic. Soft least friendly: menus Droulez boring presets for guitar, bass and vox. In addition, it is visually riquiqui (size of windows requires), so glasses for everyone! Everything is very intuitive (back in the menu gnral to try to find the last used preset), but it does seem to have corrected the POD version.

Simulations: LINE6 big stuff, so normment preset guitar, a little less for the bass and one for voice qq, combinations abound amps, speaker cabinets, effects ... but NOT ALWAYS SOUNDS THE HEIGHT! Especially having APRS Discoveries Guitar rig, and another type vst Ampeg ...
A lot of line losses, then! Let's say that we must take time to test those usable once this work is, quite a roll.
That said, fewer choices in the simulation, but better sound quality would not it smarter t from line6?

OVERALL OPINION

How long you use it and what is the particular feature you like best and least? Have you tried many other models before acqurir? How do you report qualitprix ? With the exprience, you do again this choice? * ...
Using Toneport GX 1 year, 6 months UX1. My Premire audio interfaces, no regret or worry too much after all. on the other hand, it is clear that one must necessarily go beefier ds that progresses computer music (MIDI, conversion srieuse more ...)
Most all land, zero crash!
and -: simulation many but ultimately not all used (question of taste, of course ...), a little box toc (super lightweight, rsistant?).
With the exprience? A good choice of OCCAZ (nine is expensive for what it is!). I wonder if a card with better converstisseurs without simulation boards, would not be sufficient, using vst plugins ....

But I recommend this card in its price range and see what is asked Obviously (well-made model, for more go in the studio!), Possibly to go before anything else.