All user reviews for the Behringer DJX700

It is a mixer that reflte the Money (for 200euros do not CHARACTERISTICS s'tonner of) the multi-effect for me is not of good quality in terms of sound but also sync from the tempo.Les faders are fragile, and the pramplis (gain) of this table are of poor quality. If not for the price we must admit that it is not so bad has!

UTILIZATION

The manual is clear, the mixer is easy to use. All functions are very easy to use.

SOUNDS

The console introduced many of breath if you push the master-General for the table above 8. The pramplis should not be too pousss as if the table gnre even more breath. The eq is not that evils that a. For the multi-effect against the sound is mdiocre.

OVERALL OPINION

I have been prt, I use it extensively for 2 months (wedding, evening, etc ...) I do not recommend for someone who will use it extensively but for someone one that beginners who want a cheap table it should.

I bought this mixer May 19, 2007, the effects work well, the qualiseur also faders too, but this mixer poses problem.
When the active master means a heavy breath, like the sound of the electric voltage.
Reading the manual is not clear how to assign a path prcoute SPECIFICATIONS, explanations that are more restricted.
When you connect a CD player sometimes we may well follow the instruction that the BPM counter displays a value duly!
The song In Love With David Guetta will Myselfde 280 bpm for example then what is going to ke ... 110 bpm
SPEED slide faders too, practical mix of hiphop and make a scratch parrallle platinum cd or vinyl, but for the transitions trance techno dance house, easy not easy, since ke transitions have to be slower ...

220 for the next time I reflchirais

DENIS

UTILIZATION

Simple configuration gnrale
normal function quickly and easily accessible
clear enough for manual connections and rglages
except prcoute

SOUNDS

Transparent to use, lol not at all on prcoute, apart from her, so good
yes it introduces the breath
qualizeur trs good quality

OVERALL OPINION

I use it since May 19, 2007
positive and has ngatifs see above comment
(I've never tried before MODELS, but I know enough to say that the ratio quality price is way, way trs).
I would do not elect

I use this machine to mix the vinyl, soon I will invest the ds Skud time codes.
This machine is complete for beginners (4 channels (including 3 phono), an effect between an output micro ...)

UTILIZATION

Everything is clear except the use of effects, the book must be in a cot to find the effect DSIR ...
This machine bug it happened to me after a power cut but it just me ... and the bpm is irrelevant ...
The faders are stable but fragile parraissent (apparently after I do not know if they really are ....) and especially the cross are too small (c many large faders to control precisely the sound ...).

SOUNDS

Frankly I find the sound very clear, I was partying with the ziq it goes all up!
The sound is really perfect contrast as some say ...

"When I hear the sound is loud, there's every breath and it made me Rigol ... This table does not generate qd breath unless you push the master above 8 and beyond ca outlaw ... if not the stuff that generates that's all ... "

Equaliser effective (- 32db / +12 db).
The kills are not evil =).

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for one month, will I like most is the price and number of channels and quality sound!

The least: the effects but can connect a generator to effect such KORG so it is the same qd; =)

report quality price / top (I saw a less than 175E)

I would do this choice? so if I do that and 200E can be no more if I had to (I saw such a numark 400E which has the area of ​​card fx5000 ... I think after the above should be addressed. ..).

No rack? so what?
5 ways?
RCA and XLR (for micro eh!)
eq not paramtrique
effect section intgre

UTILIZATION

Configuration? OK! Everything is very simple!
familiar terms, but the manual is clear and sufficient as the habit of BEHRINGER

SOUNDS

It is the only I grew my word, it is certain that we take for 200 not too likely to say (when you want to impersonate a ing his junior) that the sound is "not great "" too sharp "and so on. I think the sound is gnial, the bass is very round, what some people say the medium and treble parraissent trs correct me, and I have all this cost without correction or kill many on! So if nothing Toche, cdj trs well!
again, I found the box effects trs friendly and intuitive, it was not OK presets, nothing prevents the assets on a sheet printed cot Ah yes! c true! AC requires a minimum of organization and discipline DSOL ...
and the sound effects I found it!

OVERALL OPINION

Long enough to have an opinion
I like the higher the price! My least favorite BPM counters that even with bocou dynamics are a little to the street ... shame! (C easy yet in an electronic BPM ULI!)
I tried the gemini, the img, the pioneer, other behringer, among others.
quality price ratio? that will not agree?
I reffer this choice, more ways than one!

No rack but I'm not interested
4 channels + 1 micro
while RCA and XLR for mic
parametric equalizer is not
yes and j'la is pretty cool

UTILIZATION

Very easy to use
the only thing interesting in the manual is a list of effect

SOUNDS

Very good sonoritbr /> but I do not like too much of the EQ knobs

OVERALL OPINION

About 1 year of use
I like the effects
the DX626, just no ...
very good value qualitprix
yes

Non-grae rack but the edge can be built the same right.
-Enough of ways to use DJ.
-XLR and RCA
-The effects are incredible but they let themselves be used from time to time

UTILIZATION

-The configuration is the same as the tables diffrent DJ
-I have not read the manual

SOUNDS

-The console is virtually transparent in sound ... Finally it is my opinion ...

OVERALL OPINION

-It has been ending for a year I work on it.
-The good crossfather and particulirement
Good-qualitprix
And I would do the same choice

In short, my opinion is gnrale it's a good mixer almost like the pioneer.

Not a nice rack, but use two simple CD player.

UTILIZATION

The opinions donns prcdement gives a good picture of the table.

I would add that there is indeed a breath when the master is back.

Also be aware, for those who intends to use it in marriage or what type of night that the microphone no sound booth on the output. pity for those who wanted to use an amp deuxime!

Otherwise the table is trs intuitive and enjoyable to use.

SOUNDS

It's been two years since I use this table and I hear a breath when the master is thoroughly ...

OVERALL OPINION

Good food that I use for two years.

the -
I also have a problem of the master linares but my table starts to get old ...
The problem of micro also is quite annoying at least for my use

the +
Enjoyable to use
good price quality ratio

Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
I try two table Gmini I can not remember the references. I bought this table in tips.

Exprience with, you will do again this choice?
Not because this table does not quite my needs. But if I can not find a table best fits what I want, I will turn to the table!

Is Rack?
not

And what type of connection?
RCA and XLR microphone. Too bad the left or only RCA

UTILIZATION

The general configuration is it simple?
As the model Pioneer copy, it can be.

The usual functions are they easily accessible?
The effects application to have the manual handy ...

The manual is clear and sufficient?
TRANSPARENT

SOUNDS

She introduced the breath?
Personally, I mix a + / -0 dB, the table does not breath at this level.

The equalizer is effective?
Yes, I had the opportunity to mix with the DJM 600 (Pioneer), and I confess it was not comfortable with the equalizer, that of the DJX 700 is perfect for me, a little more for the very apreciate to Kill some way.

OVERALL OPINION

Since Comben time you use it?
1 week

What is so special that you love the most, the least?
+ ... looks 100% Pioneer (ergonomics, usual)
-... faders seems fragile at best.

Have you tried many models before buying it?
DJM-600
DJM-800
NUO-2
NUO-5
UMX-ES 3-way

How would you rate the quality / price?
more than well, for 160 euros (new), I'm really pleased with this table.

With experience, you do again nd choice?
For now, yes, (and more than attractive price)

.

UTILIZATION

.

SOUNDS

.

OVERALL OPINION

This is my first table, and my impression is that more mixed. Many features but most are illusory: BPM abslolument unreliable at best average effects for some and difficult to use because you have to counter the rise in volume due to the activation effects.
Otherwise the quality of the equalizer is correct and still no malfunctions to report
Briefly for those who do not really need 4-way, I recommend the Numark dxm06 in the same price range but with very usable effects.

I do not have that choice would do

Non-rackmount console.
Doom RCA (gold plated even qd)
Effects just sucks But it has all the characteristics of a large table.

UTILIZATION

Config copied from Pioneer, very effective and simple. Even intuitive. The functions are easily accessible and I have not even opened the manual

SOUNDS

Y clearly qd breath you climb the master above 7-8 10. But we can certainly stay below and the sound becomes quite drinkable, even good if the downstream system is quality.
The effects are just to forget!

Slight problem: On my last evening (yesterday), the first use of the machine recently purchased ... The sound was good until late in the evening (+ /-3 am), where high and low volume started to appear ... I have not found an acceptable explanation for this, but by connecting the PC from which came the music on a Mackie next, turning the music perfectly. The problem is the table. I therefore put him 7.

A small edit a few months: The sounds are pretty bad ... The EQ is very far from being linear (that's normal), but not log either ... The cuts are too sharp a point in time. I maintain that the breath does not exist if it agrees to keep the master up to 8. Against by the sound that comes out of this besiole does not suit me ... Problem with RCA, or the internal architecture of the table, I do not know. One thing is certain, not possible to do professional work in these conditions -> I sold it!
But I think for beginners, it can be of great service (especially the price), so that they learn on a table that has the air of a large (just look eh: D)

OVERALL OPINION

It's a Behringer, certainly, but definitely worth its price, and even more!
The price / quality ratio is unbeatable. I used all kinds of tables (Mackie, Behringer, Yamaha, Pioneer, etc.). And it is worth surment not one of those brands (but why not put XLR?), But it honorably defended much better! I highly recommend it!

Edit: this is now about 3 months I use it and it is the victim of a false contact. The power supply is cut for a few seconds sometimes qd of 1cm on the move ... I do not spit on Behringer provided. At that price, they are tacitly accepting that risk to take! Too bad all the same, I liked him but I will have to replace it with another, more reliable. Fortunately, it happened one day when I was having fun with me, but I can not risk that happening right in the event ... I go down but its overall score of 8 to 6.

Hmm, it is on these points that attracted me to the matron, trs attractive on paper but the debutanisme EST ......

UTILIZATION

L is also sduisant, "she pte this table for its price, it's crazy, it's not possible," h yeah it's not possible !..... cest ca the desilusionisme

SOUNDS

It's ugly, it blows serious, but the qual and kills it going not too bad.

OVERALL OPINION

My first (only) table, for 2 years my alie, I was quickly disappointed, shortly before its 1 year, phono amps slammed, the faders have begun to crack and messing end of the race .. .. it's ugly.
With the experience I have absolutely no choice referrer, you who read, think twice, it is better to be patient before, that of being obliged APRS (buy a new table !!!!) .............. ca cest the decutentisme. Amitis

No rack
the effects are very poor if not fun to begin djing

4 channels + 1 micro

Only RCA and XLR for mic

Eq is not parametric

UTILIZATION

Operation is very simple and the buttons are well placed I think

I covered only the last page of the manual (page white loll)

SOUNDS

It is almost transparent (almost: for the breath after wear)

Yes there is breath in the sound levels but only after wear potentiometer.

The EQ is effective up to a certain limit (limit I would say)

OVERALL OPINION

8 months (daily use x number of hours ((no stop)))

I like this track very practical, the button layout, price, durability

I do not like the sound of wind that appeared after a few months is the worst default this table should be said but I think it has to turn 8 months and everything is intact and focntionnel 100%. The only thing it does time to time you saw the c Metter bpm counter and displaying a really c but oddly OCASI is disconnected the current 3 sec it reconnects it starts and start fresh

The price is excellent I would say for what she has as she

so a realistic ssm-2200 bronze-colored

I do not refer this choice for the simple reason that I want to mix in the box and it does not effect my x-table should be changed (Especially for the breath) I then folds into the denon

Non Rack Console
Dpart effects & Returns
RCA Connectors XLR + jack & microphone
3-band EQ
Effects? If but ... 2% are usable!

UTILIZATION

Simple configuration
Manuel clear, but worth the read, the table is simple enough that

SOUNDS

Console not necessarily transparent, it introduces a lot of breath when used on large systems or default of a table are easily detectable.
Equalizer effective, but not badly configured linear

OVERALL OPINION

I used it for 2 years, mixes personal with me.
Outlawed for large accessories
I have tried many models before buying, more or less good: behringer vmx 300, pioneer djm 500 & 600, Ecler Smac & nuo, allen & heat, Oshino, Rodec ...
Report qualitprix interesting because low prices trs!
I would do this choice, I knew perfectly well what to expect by purchasing this table, it is suitable for use in non-intensive, home, or to learn about the world of mix without breaking the wallet ...

Table not rack ...

UTILIZATION

- The general configuration is it simple?
---> A table is very easy to take control
- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
---> Yes it is very complete

SOUNDS

Nothing was said about the equalizer is quite corect!

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?
---> A year and a half
- What is so special that you like most and least?
---> Most-> look PIONEER DJM 600 for three times less
the least-> pourave effect but two (40 and echo flanger 39)
heated at the table after an hour of intensive mix
the sound is OK but not great ...
quality faders and buttons is completely sucks
- Have you tried many other models before buying it?
---> So the range pioneer (djm 400.600 and 800) and a home GEMINI PMX 500
- How would you rate the quality / price?
---> It is good, however, less than 300 euros lice do not expect to be seated the same quality that a Pioneer DJM 600
- With experience, you do again this choice? ...
---> Oula it was not a big ereur on my part to buy this m *** e. .. I save a pe of more and acquire directly from a djm 600 OCCAZ!