Log in
Log in

or
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Behringer DJX700
Images
1/126

Behringer DJX700

4+ Channel Mixer from Behringer belonging to the Pro Mixer series

57 reviews
Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums

DJX700 classified ad

Alerte nouvelle annonce

Images

Reviews

3.2/5
(57 reviews)
19 %
(11 reviews)
21 %
(12 reviews)
33 %
(19 reviews)
11 %
(6 reviews)
14 %
(8 reviews)
Write a user review
Audience: Beginners
FP UserFP User

Behringer DJX700Published on 10/31/08 at 16:00
I am satisfied with most of the features on the mixer. I would have like to seen a better beat counter seeing as I am a new dj. I really think my beat counter may be screwed up, or I don't know how to use it. It was good to me for a first mixer. I would have love to seen the 8 second sampler from the Pioneer DJM-600.

Price paid

$350 Canadian

UTILIZATION

Took me around 5 minutes to set all the cables up and get it running. The manual is really helpful and I thank Behringer for making it so helpful. It was easy to understand, even for a first time buyer. I have to figure out the beat counter then it will be all good. Thats my only concern about it right now. The whole layout of the...…
Read more
I am satisfied with most of the features on the mixer. I would have like to seen a better beat counter seeing as I am a new dj. I really think my beat counter may be screwed up, or I don't know how to use it. It was good to me for a first mixer. I would have love to seen the 8 second sampler from the Pioneer DJM-600.

Price paid

$350 Canadian

UTILIZATION

Took me around 5 minutes to set all the cables up and get it running. The manual is really helpful and I thank Behringer for making it so helpful. It was easy to understand, even for a first time buyer. I have to figure out the beat counter then it will be all good. Thats my only concern about it right now. The whole layout of the faders and dials was pretty good. Every thing is in a good place.

SOUNDS

Sound quality is good, but one of my turntables is in bad shape, and it shows in the hum. If you have out of shape turntables, fix it or get a new one. It really shows in the sound. I found some of the effects to be useless, but some of the effects I like. I like the Panning Tremolo. It has a total of 46 effects built in. There is a great spinning dial to scroll through different effects easier. I am going to buy a seperate effects machine later.

OVERALL OPINION

I have not had to contact Behringer for anything that has gone wrong with the DJX 700. It has been great for me. It seems like a tough mixer, and the quality of the mixer is good.

I really like this mixer, but I can't speak for every DJ seeing that this is the first mixer I have bought. I am fairly new at DJing, but this mixer I really enjoy. I think if I had the money I would go with the Pioneer DJM-600, but for know I absolutly love this the Behringer DJX-700. I can't wait to see what they come out with next!

Originally posted on FutureProducers.com
Posted by: Unknown (January 1-, 2003)
See less
»
FP UserFP User

Behringer DJX700Published on 10/31/08 at 16:00
As a first mixer, i am very satisified with the features. as i am not an "expert", the features are more than enough to keep me entertained. i don't dj in clubs, but in my pseudo-studio.... reason being, i live in a city with no musical flavor. i spin mostly deep house and a little downtempo.

Price paid

$200

UTILIZATION

As my first studio setup, i think the manual could have been more helpful. if you have patienience however, there are more than enough resources on the net to answer any and all questions you may have.

being around many party djs in the past, i don't think i would use this mixer at a large gig. for house parties and other smaller events i think it would be...…
Read more
As a first mixer, i am very satisified with the features. as i am not an "expert", the features are more than enough to keep me entertained. i don't dj in clubs, but in my pseudo-studio.... reason being, i live in a city with no musical flavor. i spin mostly deep house and a little downtempo.

Price paid

$200

UTILIZATION

As my first studio setup, i think the manual could have been more helpful. if you have patienience however, there are more than enough resources on the net to answer any and all questions you may have.

being around many party djs in the past, i don't think i would use this mixer at a large gig. for house parties and other smaller events i think it would be good. i have had no problems, therefore no need to contact customer service.

SOUNDS

I think the sound quality is a bit above average. my setup is as follows: 2 stanton str8-100's w/ ortofon concord pro s needles behringer djx 700 onkyo tx-ds656 receiver (i would rather have a power amp as i feel it would improve the sound) klipsch kg 4.2 speakers (beautiful sound, love the horns) my main problem with the sound is probably due to the fact that my room is small and carpeted. the speakers are off the floor on cinder blocks but the equipment sits directly on the carpet. i think when i get the equipment desk off of the carpet and cinder blocks under it, it will help alleviate some of the vibration from the speakers causing some feedback in the tables. as i said, i primarily spin deep house and i think the behringer mixer is good for this.

OVERALL OPINION

I would love this to have been a BALANCED mixer vs. an unbalanced one. i am sure at some point, when money permits, i will upgrade to a different mixer, probably one with few if any effects. for a beginner like myself or any bedroom dj, i think this is a great mixer.

Originally posted on FutureProducers.com
Posted by: Unknown (January 1-, 2003)
See less
»
FP UserFP User

Behringer DJX700Published on 10/31/08 at 16:00
Very good features for money, shame that effects dont feature more control such as cutoff frequency, resonance, delay time, rather that just one universal "Level" control which just controls the volume or the effects. I have had a lot of fun playing with the effects, could do with more control though, dissapointed about this. Beatcounter seems to be a useless gimmick and I rarely use the "XPQ surround". I do like the fact you can choose the crossfader curve thoough.

Price paid: £144

UTILIZATION

Interface fine, pretty standard. No problems. Master out could be a bit further from channel 4, have knocked it by accident few times. People moving up from a really low end...…
Read more
Very good features for money, shame that effects dont feature more control such as cutoff frequency, resonance, delay time, rather that just one universal "Level" control which just controls the volume or the effects. I have had a lot of fun playing with the effects, could do with more control though, dissapointed about this. Beatcounter seems to be a useless gimmick and I rarely use the "XPQ surround". I do like the fact you can choose the crossfader curve thoough.

Price paid: £144

UTILIZATION

Interface fine, pretty standard. No problems. Master out could be a bit further from channel 4, have knocked it by accident few times. People moving up from a really low end mixer might take a while to get to grips with the assignable crossfader, not hard really though. The beat counters could be easier to use, seems to me they rarely work, and very very rarely actually show the correct tempo. Just seems to say 160 most of the time. This would be not of much use to those who need a beatcounter. Kill switches would be better if they were easier to turn of and on quickly. As it is they arnt.

SOUNDS

Sound quality good. Sometimes I think it lacks the high frequency but it might be due to other equipment

OVERALL OPINION

Am in the process of returning it, due to countless problems. The main reason for returning is the crossfader broke. Ive had a look inside and although the part connecting the knob to the insides is metal, the bit this is joined to is very thin plastic! which broke! rubbish design, I wasnt even giving it much stick. All the controls feel a bit wobbly and unsure of themselves. Ive also experienced leak between the monitor channels when at fairly high volumes. This makes mixing a bit of an ordeal. Also, the button to turn effects on isnt that bad, but sometimes has a mind of its own. As I said earlier the beatcounters might as well be replaced by a cigarrete lighter/bananna holder, as t'would be a lot more useful. The actual case build seems quite good, it hasnt fallen apart, but im not holding my breath and its only been moved 3 times in its 6 month life. Basically this mixer is a cheapo rip off of the pionneer DJM 500 I think which is a lot nicer. If you got the money get that instead (I dont!)

Well I loved it for the first 3 months or so.. Now I dont so much hate it, but I dont quite feel the same anymore, it hasnt got what it once did and to be honest I cant see us lasting much longer. Let me rephrase that; I cant see it lasting much longer. Don't love it - Dont hate it. First 3 months love of about 8, now due to broken monitor cues and shattered crossfaders, i barely feel half that way any more.....

Originally posted on FutureProducers.com
Posted by: pielicker ( 6-, 2005)
See less
»

Tech. sheet

  • Manufacturer: Behringer
  • Model: DJX700
  • Series: Pro Mixer
  • Category: 4+ Channel Mixers
  • Added in our database on: 04/08/2005

We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed

»

Manuals and other files

Other categories in DJ Consoles

Other names: djx 700

cookies
We are using cookies!

Yes, Audiofanzine is using cookies. Since the last thing that we want is disturbing your diet with too much fat or too much sugar, you'll be glad to learn that we made them ourselves with fresh, organic and fair ingredients, and with a perfect nutritional balance. What this means is that the data we store in them is used to enhance your use of our website as well as improve your user experience on our pages and show you personalised ads (learn more). To configure your cookie preferences, click here.

We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent
These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine and allow its optimization. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Example: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).
Audience analysis (Google Analytics)
We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it.
Advertising (Google Ads)
This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.
Marketing (Meta Pixel)

On our websites, we use the Meta Pixel. The Meta Pixel is a remarketing pixel implemented on our websites that allows us to target you directly via the Meta Network by serving ads to visitors of our websites when they visit the social networks Facebook and Instagram. The meta pixel are code snippets which are able to identify your browser type via the browser ID - the individual fingerprint of your browser - and to recognise that you have visited our websites and what exactly you have looked at on our websites. When you visit our websites, the pixel establishes a direct connection to Meta's servers. Meta is able to identify you by your browser ID, as this is linked to other data about you stored by Meta on your Facebook or Instagram user account. Meta then delivers individualised ads from us on Facebook or on Instagram that are tailored to your needs.

We ourselves are not in a position to identify you personally via the meta pixel, as apart from your browser ID no other data is stored with us via the pixel.

For more information about the Meta Pixel, the details of data processing via this service and Meta's privacy policy, please visit Meta Privacy Policy - How Meta collects and uses user data for Facebook and Meta Privacy Policy - How Meta collects and uses user data for Instagram.

Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd. is a subsidiary of Meta Platforms, Inc. based in the USA. It cannot be ruled out that your data collected by Facebook will also be transmitted to the USA.


We did not wait for a law to make us respect our members and visitors' privacy. The cookies that we use are only meant to improve your experience on our website.

Our cookies
Cookies not subject to consent

These are cookies that guarantee the proper functioning of Audiofanzine. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. Examples: cookies that help you stay logged in from page to page or that help customizing your usage of the website (dark mode or filters).

Audience analysis (Google Analytics)

We are using Google Analytics in order to better understand the use that our visitors make of our website in an attempt to improve it. When this parameter is activated, no personal information is sent to Google and the IP addresses are anonymized.

Advertising (Google Ads)

This information allows us to show you personalized advertisements thanks to which Audiofanzine is financed. By unchecking this box you will still have advertisements but they may be less interesting :) We are using Google Ad Manager to display part of our ads, or tools integrated to our own CMS for the rest. We are likely to display advertisements from our own platform, from Google Advertising Products or from Adform.

Marketing (Meta Pixel)

On our websites, we use the Meta Pixel. The Meta Pixel is a remarketing pixel implemented on our websites that allows us to target you directly via the Meta Network by serving ads to visitors of our websites when they visit the social networks Facebook and Instagram. The meta pixel are code snippets which are able to identify your browser type via the browser ID - the individual fingerprint of your browser - and to recognise that you have visited our websites and what exactly you have looked at on our websites. When you visit our websites, the pixel establishes a direct connection to Meta's servers. Meta is able to identify you by your browser ID, as this is linked to other data about you stored by Meta on your Facebook or Instagram user account. Meta then delivers individualised ads from us on Facebook or on Instagram that are tailored to your needs.

We ourselves are not in a position to identify you personally via the meta pixel, as apart from your browser ID no other data is stored with us via the pixel.

For more information about the Meta Pixel, the details of data processing via this service and Meta's privacy policy, please visit Meta Privacy Policy - How Meta collects and uses user data for Facebook and Meta Privacy Policy - How Meta collects and uses user data for Instagram.

Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd. is a subsidiary of Meta Platforms, Inc. based in the USA. It cannot be ruled out that your data collected by Facebook will also be transmitted to the USA.


You can find more details on data protection in our privacy policy.
You can also find information about how Google uses personal data by following this link.