Advance Acoustic MCD203II user reviews ( 4/10) - 5 user reviews

• 10/07/11

  leana911's review ( translated ) Improve this translation " good quality / price ratio"

  Overall Opinion

  I use this stuff since 2008 "no problemo" sonnorité a soft and warm through the exit tube "tube sovteck" not original
  
  also uses the digital output "in coaxial" accuracy is phenomenal and the message timer is formidable and oversampling in 24/192khz is good
  
  the quality / price is right and different views on this stuff
  
  What is it to miles and cents for the stuff, has nothing, not that those who do this are the difference between a complete and pushed to extreme and a tin sold in our store price?? ?????
  
  "No comment"
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 10/26/10

  Shimin's review ( translated ) Improve this translation " To flee"

  Overall Opinion

  I bought this player in January 2007. It worked properly until July 2007 (average usage 1 hour / day). Then she started having problems reading more and more frequent.
  
  
  
  I made a VAS in August because 20% of my CDs (not burned, and often new) no longer read. She came back, I think changed the optical, in September 2007. She again dysfunctions from May / June 2008 to finally be out of service in July 2008. To date, no longer under warranty I grieve for my € 550 and bought a player from another brand.
  
  
  
  I find it unacceptable acoustic ADVANCE put on the market a player to 550 € minimum that is as unreliable, especially as the model in my possession was the MCD203 II (So the second version).
  
  
  
  Reading the reviews on the forums I'm not the first to advance myself is abused by acoustic.
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 04/10/10

  darius 14's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Overall Opinion

  I use it for 2 years
  
  
  
  I tested before HK Yamaha Denon Marantzetc ...
  
  
  
  Platinum lenteet noisy output tubes home of very poor quality to change emergency sovteck or mule to get a correct result but will never be worth vincent, Jolida or their Chinese equivalents.
  
  
  
  money mediocre
  
  
  
  decoseiller choice except posers without ear for the look!
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 05/16/09

  Ipo24's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Overall Opinion

  - How long have you use it?
  
  2 years
  
  
  
  - Most
  
  The sound! Even better with Sovtek tubes.
  
  The quality of the analog output (not tried out numrique).
  
  The simplicity.
  
  
  
  - The least
  
  60 seconds of heating tubes the power to annoy me every time.
  
  The CEC drive is supposedly the very best, but that is wrong trs. Sometimes he loses track during playback, it does not load some CDs (mostly burned CDs). He made a small noise audible low volume. Frankly, his performance is not even the height of a player 50.
  
  The CD load times a little long.
  
  
  
  - Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
  
  NAD and HK.
  
  
  
  - How do you report qualitprix?
  
  For sound, the report qualitprix is ​​excellent.
  
  For the drive, it is lamentable.
  
  
  
  - With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
  
  I am sharing.
  
  This player has a default of rdhibitoires mcanique signal as Previous in the notice.
  
  For cons, the sound is simply stunning. So I think I'll still keep a long time (this will be my last CD of all fawn).
  
  For cons, I invite those interested by this player if it supports good rflchir default of its drive.

  N / A

  N / A

  N / A
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno
• 04/24/09

  djmotion's review ( translated ) Improve this translation

  Overall Opinion

  - How long have you use it?
  
  
  
  2 months.
  
  
  
  - What is the particular feature you like most?
  
  Sonora sound of a heat and an exceptional dtail (couplet with the amp and speaker ADVANCE ACOUSTIC MAP305 Focal).
  
  The vintage look with a finish treats in appearance.
  
  HD-CD compatibility
  
  
  
  - What is the particular feature you like least?
  
  An optical borked (and I pse my words):
  
  After one week of use, I soon noisy dchant mcanique dificult then more and more pronounced reading see total ignorance of the original CDs.
  
  
  
  When the stability mcanique I realized that it is compensated by a buffer memory, comparable operating a portable CD or a PC (not a bad make up for a basic design of the drive by accident? ).
  
  
  
  - Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
  
  Including several NAD, Rotel, Sony, Denon, Marantz, Harman Kardon, Philips 723 (dernire this is not like the plate of the century the road level): all can read CDs without prolmes
  
  
  
  - How do you report qualitprix?
  
  In view of the problem meets all bad (and apparently according to some I am far from being the only problem with having).
  
  
  
  - With the exprience, you do again this choice?
  
  
  
  Surely not. Too bad because the sound is a real massacre and you really have to type up to find an equivalent in a competitive but the tracking for a device is an Audiophile prtendu dsastre.

  N / A

  N / A

  N / A
  Did you find this review helpful?yesno

• Page: 1