View other reviews for this product:
coroners « Daube »
Published on 07/14/11 at 18:39Said before:
Table Rack
Lack of a box effect (a true)
just filter
The aqua non-parametric (damage)
no auto-mix for me, I go my way
UTILIZATION
-The manual is clear and sufficient?
No, only in English!
The general configuration-is it simple: yes (1H
-The usual functions are they easily accessible?
Simple EQ for bof, the filter sucks
SOUNDS
It heats very quickly, too!
Low sizzles many, often obliged to descend EQUASIS ... no top
the voices too high spit ...
The preview is in mono and boring to use,
the headphone output is rather weak ... you need a headphone amp, you mix a lot on the fly for calibration if you don t have sufficient back.
The Master and Aux 1 & 2 is super boring,
I do not give a damn about it settle in my mix!
ils'auraient separate channels of the master of your life once you pass your eyes
meters for the top and bottom for the headphone feeble, at the end it's still on the fly.
The filter is really bad, you know why it jumps!
the
Connected to the amp ... you have a great pre-amps to get ouf of sound,
the box effect send, big problem, because the preview not good, always on the fly ...
It is serious mouth with turntables ...
If you put in extension, the extension cord should think well be connected to a ground, otherwise it farts.
OVERALL OPINION
For my part I mix in 12 years!
I've had three weeks,
I had vestax, Pioneer, Denon, Rodec!
I bought the A & H, more out of curiosity,
5 years, big brands War,
I sold the djm 2000, after one month because it goes off by itself,
the Vestax, but very good restaurant indeed rotten, the Equasis are the top 580!
I have two a Denon 1500 and 1600, then two Rodec a small Rane (the former not comparable)
The Xone 92 is disappointing,
very expensive for a table which will remain in the final at home
if you had a djm 500 or a Denon 1500 or Rodec (Old) you soon realize: damn money in the air!
Too much too expensive, you pay the brand!
I prefer to put out the ears than buying this brand again!
Table Rack
Lack of a box effect (a true)
just filter
The aqua non-parametric (damage)
no auto-mix for me, I go my way
UTILIZATION
-The manual is clear and sufficient?
No, only in English!
The general configuration-is it simple: yes (1H
-The usual functions are they easily accessible?
Simple EQ for bof, the filter sucks
SOUNDS
It heats very quickly, too!
Low sizzles many, often obliged to descend EQUASIS ... no top
the voices too high spit ...
The preview is in mono and boring to use,
the headphone output is rather weak ... you need a headphone amp, you mix a lot on the fly for calibration if you don t have sufficient back.
The Master and Aux 1 & 2 is super boring,
I do not give a damn about it settle in my mix!
ils'auraient separate channels of the master of your life once you pass your eyes
meters for the top and bottom for the headphone feeble, at the end it's still on the fly.
The filter is really bad, you know why it jumps!
the
Connected to the amp ... you have a great pre-amps to get ouf of sound,
the box effect send, big problem, because the preview not good, always on the fly ...
It is serious mouth with turntables ...
If you put in extension, the extension cord should think well be connected to a ground, otherwise it farts.
OVERALL OPINION
For my part I mix in 12 years!
I've had three weeks,
I had vestax, Pioneer, Denon, Rodec!
I bought the A & H, more out of curiosity,
5 years, big brands War,
I sold the djm 2000, after one month because it goes off by itself,
the Vestax, but very good restaurant indeed rotten, the Equasis are the top 580!
I have two a Denon 1500 and 1600, then two Rodec a small Rane (the former not comparable)
The Xone 92 is disappointing,
very expensive for a table which will remain in the final at home
if you had a djm 500 or a Denon 1500 or Rodec (Old) you soon realize: damn money in the air!
Too much too expensive, you pay the brand!
I prefer to put out the ears than buying this brand again!