All user reviews for the MOTU UltraLite

-The number of entries (10) and output (14). Microphone inputs complete and quality preamps
-I use it now for the Home Studio, but I plan to use the outputs to multicast ...
-I use it on a laptop Acer Centrino / 1.6 Ghz / 512 MB Ram 60 DD GG DD + 80 GB external USB 2
- Used primarily with microphones (Apex 415, Rode NT1, 414 ... C) but with an electric bass

UTILIZATION

-The installation was almost smoothly (qques missed at the beginning with the installer MOTU "interface not recognized after installing the CD Rom") so I used to install the XP drivers
- To date no pbes ...
- The config is easy
- The manual (in English) ... I still open

GETTING STARTED

-The drivers are stable
I use Cubase, Audacity ...
Zero-latency foot!
-Up to now I pile the tracks one by one and by simultaneously read ... 8

OVERALL OPINION

-I use it for 6 hours and I'm already hooked!
-The English manual and installation MOTU a little "galley"
"I have a ream M-Audio Firewire Solo, a Presonus Inspire 1394, but the Ultralite
exceeds the
Value-unbeatable price considering the quality of the preamps and the possibilities of the "beast"!
For now, no regrets ...

- I was looking for a sound card more "fine", more accurate than my previous models.
Mission accomplished with the Ultralite. It's lace.
- I use it in a home studio config 100% electronic and is connected to a PC running XP Home SP2 (Asus P4P800-E, 3GB PIV, 1GB RAM ...). It will no doubt be used in live, hence the interest of compactness and excellent build quality (it feels the tough stuff).

UTILIZATION

- Installation without a history (I did not use the original CD but went in direct MOTU download the latest drivers).
- To date, no Incompatibility met; FLOW (even with my "old" Cubase SL v1), which is not the case of some models of newer cards.
- The config is quiet, the Cue Mix is ​​simple and uneventful, but not essential when working in direct monitoring in Cubase.
- Hand side is a bit heavy because only in English. Even when you master the language, it is painful to have to play translator (I would rather make music during this time ...). So, just one point less for that.

GETTING STARTED

- To date, no problem with the drivers (I do not know the frequency of updating in Motu)
- I use with Cubase SL and Wavelab. Still, I did a little test with demos and Live Fruity, it works impeccable.
- Side latency ... is low, very low. It's great fun.
- For the moment, I did not test with thousands of audio tracks but the beast should be collected, given the performance.

OVERALL OPINION

- It's been three weeks (only) as I explore
- In the positive, I would say almost everything, it will be less for the manual in English.
- I worked with an old Delta 66 (incidentally very nice) but the accuracy is better sound.
- Value for money nickel. Can finally afford a Motu without eating potatoes for ten years is quite nice!
- The choice I would do without hesitation ...

RPTES bought to record or see to catch maquter vocals / guitar + pramp
barebone msi 180 2200 + 1giga/ram western digital 7200T
not very complicated to install mm childish I'd say, for against ATTENTION: srieux problem of firewire, firewire to my base on my barebone inappropriate, jai add the card (40 euros at Darty, beklin 3 ports ). Seen to this problem is the forum rcurant !!!!!

UTILIZATION

I will rpter ... FIREWIRE but big problem is my Premire card so it can be normal but apparently has often done for this card, chipset via the deprecated and NEC firewire card, opting instead for the intel , texas ...
config if not easy

GETTING STARTED

Cubase SX, everything seems to work, not on test tracks bcp

OVERALL OPINION

I've had one week, been using it for 2 days after nights of hard to understand the concerns of his that I (sometimes closer to pink noise as music dla ...). Qd a walk, the air ringing aa lot for that price. I worked on pro tools HD is on when it's not the same mm but for ptites config is sufficient. To see if the chaining works, can become a very interesting (16 analog inputs / outputs for 1200 euros, the average price dla Digi002). If you're a little handy and you will know a little computer / sound, for beginners I would recommend the Digi002 but this is only my opinion ... Preamp Premire seem nice view, virtually no latency so far, comes with soft very clear. Just what worries firewire very restrictive, but once rolling rgler any a priori

- What characteristics have motivated your choice?

All! Firewire, the number of inputs and outputs, stand-alone aspect of the card mix, mini screen integrated monitoring, etc. format.

- For what purpose?

Replace my Digi 002 for my work and my personal friendly sessions for friends. The amateur, but demanding!

- What is your config (Motherboard / CPU / Ram / Hard ,...)?

Two configs for now, a dual G5 and a MacBook 2GHz. In other words, that sound values ​​with respect to a map Motu.

- Which instruments and systems (console, preamp, DTD ...) you use it and how connections? ...

No mixer, the card takes care of herself very well, just a preamp with digital outputs upstream and / or the same for 10 entries. Instrumentation classical guitar, bass, microphone, keyboard etc..

UTILIZATION

- The installation is done it without problems?

Plug and play, can be used without installing drivers, but you still have to install (and reboot) if you want to use the Cue Mix Console.

- Have you experienced any incompatibilities?

No
- The general configuration is easy?

It is clear, simple, effective! A real treat!

- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...

Light, but also practical. At the same time it is a sound card is not very complicated.

GETTING STARTED

- The drivers are stable?

Yes!

- Are they often updated?

No idea.

- Are they often updated?

With a Mac and a Motu? Digital Performer of course! Machfive, Bias Peak and some VSTi instruments.
- What you get lag?

It must be played to a quarter of a micron of hair! In other words, zero latency, or when I play faster than my shadow!
- How many tracks you get to record / play time? ...

A record, as far as I input, ie 10. Without any sign of weakness or dropping from the card or computer (1GB RAM for the portable version, 2GB for desktop).

Read, for now my biggest project is 36 tracks and it runs itself without squealing.

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?

Ten days to be significant.

- What is so special that you like most and least?

<img src="img.audiofanzine.com/img/v35/icones/plus.gif" class="plusmoins" width="35" height="11"> Subject to the mic preamps, really large, the dynamics of the map in general, very powerful, comprehensive connectivity, console CueMix really excellent, the robustness of the case, the solid appearance of the rest elsewhere etc.. !
<img src="img.audiofanzine.com/img/v35/icones/minus.gif" class="plusmoins" width="35" height="11"> we need small fingers to use the Trim buttons or volume, the front is complete but the space is still relatively small.

- Have you tried many other models before buying it?

Too much!
- How would you rate the quality / price?

Really excellent! One moment I thought the card was the ideal mobile Firebox firewire, but frankly this is not small Motu beats everyone hands down. It is inconceivable for the price! Motu Congratulations!
- With experience, you do again this choice? ...

I plan to acquire the same analog console and a second for a small studio inline 20-way! I think of when you see the high quality of the thing!
I want to thank Mr. Nours © for all his good advice that led me to buy this card! I just have to convince him to buy his own!

What characteristics have motivated your choice?
Firewire, many of exit, the front panel display, the size

For what purpose?
Home studio

What is your config (Motherboard / CPU / Ram / Hard ,...)?
P4 3.2GHz 1.5GB of mem viv, 500GB HDD, and a PCI firewire card in the mail order

With which instruments or systems (console, preamp, DTD ...) do you use the connection and how?
Guitar, bass, DI, Keyboard

UTILIZATION

The installation is done it without problems?
Nickel

Have you experienced any incompatibilities?
No! (I've been lucky ?????)

The general configuration is easy?
Very simple software and audio cue mix setup very practical

The manual is clear and sufficient? ...
Manual in English (a shame)

GETTING STARTED

The drivers are stable?
Yes

What software do you use most often?
Cubase SX3, Ableton Live

What you get lag?
Entree 13ms 10ms Out

How many tracks you get to record / play time? ...
Not tested but for now it runs without worry

OVERALL OPINION

How long have you use it?
2 weeks

What is so special that you like most and least?
The least: the small size of the buttons and little spaced
Plus: The value for money

Have you tried many other models before buying it?
I had a digi 001 before I get to lower the latency with the motu
I tested the digi 002 which was less stable on my system and the side was less convenient transport

With experience, you do again this choice? ...
For now, yes! Now we will see life??

Use only portable with firewire connection
toshiba p100-153
vsti cubase + + keyboard emu x board 25
tronic m / Vangard / Z3TA

UTILIZATION

Yes, no worries, the manual can be more explicit but hey! was used in computing to dbrouiller as can be

GETTING STARTED

Nothing to say ...

OVERALL OPINION

Since about a month. I like the quality of manufacture as I travel often and I tried building an interface that can srieuse rsister my dplacements. sound, dynamic trs Submitted ...
I have a firebox and then the diffrence means motu case does not heat up too much (I was in Poland these days, so climate).
connectivity of mobile enough for me so happy!
I find the front and back cover charge but trs MOTU had to make an effort to cram all the connections. I wish I can use it without external power on the move but it is a problem of laptop, I'm serious shit!
and then the software suite that helps me is nothing I CABASE the first hour, so hard for me to pass that offers me a MOTU. I do not regret my purchase, trs good audio interface, really.

I was looking to replace a certe excellent but a little old DIGI 001 Digidesign especially because of the inability to connect this card on a laptop. I wanted to find the same range of connection and the same quality preamp without neutral wind, etc.. There is no 36 such cards on the market. The MOTU is well positioned in price / quality ratio. I heard the good of the Presonus FIREBOX but the number of entries seemed right.

I also bought this card for the DSP which seems less CPU seek another card and it was an argument of weight for my old laptop.

I use the MOTU as home-made studio for guitars, vocals, bass, synth, etc.. I have no preamp or console because I believe that the MOTU preamp is sufficient to themselves and the fact that it can act as a standalone mixer offered me to buy a console.

My config is divided between a Dell P4 3GHz, 512 RAM and an old-Fujitsu laptop running at only 1.88 ghz and 256 RAM. When I asked if the MOTU fonctionneriat on it, the stores told me that yes, "which is the soft food, not the map" ... rather a good sign!

UTILIZATION

By installing the MOTU I had fond memories for long sessions at the con with the old stuff. They really rose to that level. I must say that my DIGI OO1 had six years and I did not have any other card in the meantime.

I did not even used the CD that came and went the last chopper drivers on the MOTU site. Instalation without any worries, being careful to start with first install the drivers, click to accept a few here and there, restart, once registry cleaning, plug and presto it worked first time.

I see guys on the forum galèreent with stories of IRQ conflicts in the bios where I do not know what ... damage, I had no trouble ... Perhaps the fact that my PC is not a gas plant and I customized runs on the Intel base. When buying, keep hanging on the compatibility between the card and PC components. We often pale with exotic configs hacked in every sense.

Then, for the config, it&#39;s about setting the soft ... Just know it.

These remarks are also valid on the laptop, no worries ... but I plan to use it only to the taking off solo ... logically not make a whole mixes old nanard like that and knees.

In any case no cracking on 2, once the adjustments made.

But ... at the beginning is not easy to navigate their stories mix console thing, and this especially as they damn manual is in English and I had beautiful send an email to the importer and to MOTU, I see nothing coming. In my opinion it is not yet translated. It is unacceptable these days to buy stuff for that price and not having a French manual. So, to date, I does not use all the possibilities of MOTU. But hey, we are in the world of computer music and the world of computer music is the démerder first.

So I stick 5 because although it works perfect, hello to any dip because of the manual in English.

GETTING STARTED

No problems with the drivers, they seem very stable.
I do not know if they are updated ... and then, as long as it works.
I have run 2 to 3 milliseconds of latency input and output ... Finally! It&#39;s totally transparent.

For the number of tracks, I have not done testing with a lot of runs.

Finally, the most important and then I can compare that against my DIGI 001 which was already very good. The SOUND!

It&#39;s pretty amazing how the MOTU is transparent. I rapprelle registry renewal of my debut digital 8-track Korg, it was clean but cold. Here, the sound is warm, clear, precise, detailed ... and especially no breath and that&#39;s excellent. I think the entries are all symmetrical. DIGI on, I used to spend my Jazz Bass with plugs for obtenr sound I wanted. And at a time I bypassed the plugs and found the direct sound of the bass through the preamp is simply excellent. Returning to the essence of sound with such a device.

A surprising detail caught my old sheets and listening again badly encoded MP3. The DIGI, treble sounded logically wrong and there on the MOTU, it does not forgive. One senses immediately that we have a much higher definition, the defects do not pass. The rendering is very analytical and transcribed all the errors of mix and mastering. I have not yet done so to mix with the MOTU, but I know I will enjoy to remix projects for former chopper defects. In short, it&#39;s precision and sense immediately that we are not dealing with the beginner stuff.

OVERALL OPINION

One month

Plus:
- The high definition sound, transparent preamps
The potential for mix-standalone (what joy to be able to connect without hearing all the fan of the PC!)
- The seriousness in building
- One arm, one rule and it works

Minimum:
- French manual not doing that ls routing options are not to enter évideentes

MOTU&#39;s reputation is second to none. It is sometimes the scope of spending a little more for such quality and yet, I find that the price of this card is fully justified.

I was looking for a sound card to perform a digital input-output SPDIF, MIDI, at least 6 audio inputs and 8 outputs, all in 24 bits and 48 kHz, which fits well at the MAC, size 1 U and a reasonable price for recording, editing and mix.
In short, for a music production simple and not too expensive.
Recently, the manufacturers realize that the cards more than 1000 euros is not available and may be too teams for working in home studio. Thus merger of smaller modules and more "effective" much cheaper.
The choice of the ultralite has been plutt the meeting of this trend that I find more practical and less technical and Will Fidler to stay through the choice of the software used. The output of this card fell so good.
But Reason derrire, 768 M of RAM and processor that runs 800 million, we forget.
Too rich. We must remain prudent and use the applications separately. Samples of the sounds in Reason Performer running in sync via Rewire, Reason and the exit process if ncessaire, it works well. All dpend as the fawn you dial
The sound of the instrument taken voice go through pre-amp in FOCUSRITE symtriques and other records of the Previous or spdif jack.
If you have a computer system connected to a home cinma preamp, connect the 8 outputs with 6, 7 or 8 discrete channels for multichannel COST.
To connect a guitar, an XLR jack is high impdance front. Another is derrire.
Personally, I use the XLR front for a classic talkback.

UTILIZATION

The installation was done properly.
Called out the inputs and outputs of the card and the names appear in the audio software. Peinard.
The manual IS in English. So it is perfect to Improve your english language.
Read aloud for pronunciation, "Is in zzzzzzze zzzzzzzzzzze sound box"
Srieusement a translation for Christmas, with gift wrap, has rassurrait well.

GETTING STARTED

Drivers ok
Utiliss Software: Digital Performer and Reason
Latency: I must verifies
I record a track for both the moment.

OVERALL OPINION

3 months of use alone.
It is small and "box" though.
The sound is good enough for a little prod. This issue is so relative that I can not venture further. If you are a purist, low acute transient harmonics blablabla has to pay. Cher.
If you like the catch of his nomadic, with a handy map, when the same sound quality, right price and not too limited, it is probably the card for you.
Also, if you have thin fingers to turn the pots in faade, fine. Too small for any obviousness.
If you turn on MAC intel is compatible.
Otherwise, rflchissez what you want to do before you buy, that's all.

- What technical specifications motivated your choice?
mic preamp that goes up by three levels of 60dB dpart + 24 dB not prs
- For what purpose?
home studio, sound model for
- What is your config (motherboard / CPU / Ram / Hard ,...)?
IBM T41 CPU 1.5 RAM 256 DD 4200T / M VIA FIREWIRE PACMCIA
- Which instruments or Systmes (console, prampli, DTD ...) you use it and how connections? ...
RODE K2 Cubase SX
High end Hi-Fi costs on

UTILIZATION

No, but fortunately there were other opinions:
the public opinion: If like me who has a FireWire PCMCIA (laptop), the card should be impractical with a brand Controller Texas Lucent ... cf. WWW.MOTU.COM
Darty Belkin 50 3 6-pin FireWire cable 6 to a 4 with Texas and Controller
So
Manual useless for me because AudioDesk and succinct brochure

GETTING STARTED

Absolutely
V.1.0 home if I do not know a little card rcente
Cubase SX
Setup 32bit 96Khz = 256 Buffer I / O 3.646ms 2.781ms (recording)
Setup 44.1 kHz 16 bit = 128 Buffer I / O 4.172ms 3.152ms (for 50 tracks cost a Stros)
with only 256 of ram!

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?
for several weeks
- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
volume that supplies the lamps and adjustable static accuracy prs but not a pure grain cd its net to capture just the background noise surrounding pushing some 60db pramps become deprecated
robustness of matrial utiliss
- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
EDIROL FA 66 410 M-AUDIO
- How do you report qualitprix?
TB
- With the exprience, you do again this choice? ...
if there is not technologically better tomorrow

I bought it for the number of I / O because it is small.
Use in home studio with frquents travel.
Congig: Asus 1.6 GHz, 1GB RAM
pramp lamp SM Audio TB101 Po, keyboard matre oxygen, Cubase SX2, Ableton Live, VST intruments ...

UTILIZATION

Installation without any problem.
No incompatibility. (Emphasis added because "read the forum might scare some).
Gnrale configuration very easy, and even to beginners too.
Manual lightweight, medium, several times the same stuff, not easy to find an info.

GETTING STARTED

Drivers stable.
Last day? I wait.
Latency is more than enough even live, and I can record / play as many tracks as I need it.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for three months.
I love the sound, the fact that it is very small, lgre, but at the same time she looks super strong. The number of I / O enables routing of madness and the two pramp Intgr are good.
The CueMix and so easy that beginners is not clear trs. Used to it quickly.
Too bad there's not one or two effects in the CueMix.
I do m'tais may be too little information but that the Ultralite is powered by the laptop, it is essential that it has a 6 pin firewire (I'm a bit of ).
Too bad they also provide the standard with a manual (!) Software (Audiodeck) which is only available for Mac.
Before I had an EMU 1212M internally so I can not judge on The models of the same type.
I bought in the U.S. so the report qualitprix worth it.
Yes I would do this choice because I am happy trs.

- What characteristics have motivated your choice?

the number of input output, midi in out, preamp, high quality firewire autonomous, standalone function, height, weight, guaranteed compatibility on MAC

- For what purpose?

music production studio and live

- What is your config (Motherboard / CPU / Ram / Hard ,...)?

Desktop PC: Athlon 3000 +, 300 GB HDD, 1GB ram
Mobile: MacBook 13 "Intel Core 2 Duo 2 Ghz, 1GB RAM, 120 GB HDD>> 1 partition with OSX, Windows XP with a partition BOOTCAMP

- Which instruments and systems (console, preamp, DTD ...) you use it and how connections? ...

bass, guitar, microphone, vinyl turntables (with timecode vinyls)

UTILIZATION

- The installation is done it without problems?

Mac OSX: nikel, motu recess is therefore no pb installation takes 1 minute and is immediately operational
WIN XP: same, slightly longer installation, click more to do, but in the end everything is ok, no bugs of any kind

In both cases, only a reboot was necessary

- Have you experienced any incompatibilities?
no ... not on the windows partition I was nervous given what we read on the forums ... and finally all went well

- The general configuration is easy?

yes it is very clear as well on OSX than on XP
DSP console is very comprehensive

- The manual is clear and sufficient? ...

Clearly, yes and no, in English, but actually I just flew
a French textbook would have been welcome (hence the 9 / 10)

GETTING STARTED

- The drivers are stable?

Until now, yes, no bug has yet emerged

- Are they often updated?

I do not know, a long-term view. The updates are available on the website of Motu.

- What software do you use most often?

Cubase SX2, Reason 3, 5 Live, Traktor DJ Studio .... and I plan to make soon Logic

- What you get lag?

less than 5 ms, it depends

- How many tracks you get to record / play time? ...
I have not tried to load the beast, but in any case with a dozen big style VST Korg Legacy Cell, the processor was only a 20%
see a long term ... I will complete my opinion

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it?

has only 2 or 3 h

- What is so special that you like most and least?

on number of in / out, portability and simple installation, bug-free

- Have you tried many other models before buying it?

No, I inquired about any kind of forum, I hesitated with the TC Konnekt 24D, but after having had two in hand, I chose the Motu, which seemed more reliable ... and the ADAT not useful for me, for now, so I preferred the multiple input output jacks

- How would you rate the quality / price?

excellent. it is a budget, but given the functionality and reliability of the product is really good

- With experience, you do again this choice? ...

I did not yet fully exploited, but I feared that incompatibility with Windows, ultimately it turns perfectly.
can be, with a bigger budget, I chose an EMR but good for 500euros, there really is no hesitation.

See the reviews for Low carastéristques

Config:
Athlon PC (3200?) Dual processor
WCRC ASUS (pilot FW Texas Instruments)
2GB Ram competition
IDE HDD 7200 320 GB System
500GB SATA2 HDD banks
Audio RAID HDD 160GB SATA1
XP SP2

Accuracy: the previous message said that the I / O jacks are tight and the need to avoid hefty jacks: Neutrik I have "in large sheets" and it goes smoothly!

UTILIZATION

- Compatibility: zero interest! Install a quiet, everything worked right away!
When you read the forum was a little scared, but I thought there must be the 15 guys on this forum board can, and all others who do not show up because they do not galèrent! Good pick!

GETTING STARTED

- Stability OK
- Latency 5 ms to 48khz (it should do under 3ms 96khz)
- Console (CueMix) is correct and aesthetic
- It sounds!

Preamps: Comparison with a Universal Audio LA-610.
Micro used: C414 XLII
Listens: Dynaudio BM5-A
Headphones: Beyer DT770 Pro

After some testing voice + nylon guitar, I can tell you that the MOTU rivals him in terms of dynamics, presence, accuracy. There are many highs without there being aggressive!
Of course, the LA-610 is an all-tube, so it has its grain to it, but what struck me is that the MOTU does not sound cold next to him! The heat is present, and the sound is musical!
I was very impressed with these preamps!

Cons:
* The buttons are very small, turn the volume turn by turn!
* The period of 4 seconds to turn it off is a bit boring, but I quibble!

OVERALL OPINION

I did that for three days, so this is a hot first impression, but it is excellent!
The ratio Q / P seems to me excellent, especially because the number of I / O and especially the quality of the preamp!

I wanted a mobile audio interface for my Toshiba M40X 118
Pentium M730 equipped with TI firewire internal 1 GB RAM + 1 External USB2 HD 7200 trs / min
and the Possibility of extension with my already well-equipped home studio (I'm a singer songwriter, guitarist, keyboard enthusiast for almost always)

UTILIZATION

Regarding the installation is better to copy the driver from the CD to the HD or directly download the latest update it and after a trouble free installation manual in English ... shame but the interface is intuitive and once the 'we understand the spirit of the cue-mix we say that it is very easy and we are very intelligent ... M and M as Motu Mac as PC users are left out grrrr .. and for Tanpis "AudioDesk" the software supplied with the Ultralite

GETTING STARTED

There is the brand experience for drivers is super stable.
For the latency varies between I 96 and 512 samples as appropriate.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 3 months soon and I think the sound is clean, neutral, non-aggressive Péchu. I appreciate the mini side table mix, the gain setting can be saved each entry, this allows among others to leave their equipment connected to his ideas quickly enrregistrer thus avoiding an opportunity to connect to reconnect his cables.Les buttons facade are also ultralite mini but then ...
This is a good value for money, I had problems with the Konnekt 24D (and other cuts of his ...) I could test, compare with the Konnekt Motu together for one week of the two brands qualitée Each one is as good with its extras (effects, adat for Konnekt / more analog inputs, more possibilities for mixing Motu) But on my system well over the Ultralite in terms of the Konnekt stabilitée then j ' have kept and no regrets the Motu.

What motivated my choice:
- Midi in / out
- The 2 XLR preamp
- Multiple input and output jack
- The reputation of the brand

Usage:
Home-studio recording of guitar and voice. Using VST instruments.

Config:
- Windows XP
- Amd 64 3200 +
- 1 GB of RAM

I use no preamp or mixer. I plug my mic directly on the map.

UTILIZATION

Installation is no problem.
No conflict.
The general pattern is clear.

The manual is in English, but frankly, it does not take a pro engineer to use this card and get excellent results.

Or, basically, you just unpacking the box, you branches, t'instales, you record and it sounds live.

GETTING STARTED

The drivers are impeccable! There is an update on the site of Motu.

I use Cubase SX, Reason, Live, Wavelab.

Latencies are very low (I do not have numbers in front). By recording in 24 bit - 96 Khz it rolls so well that we forget what the word latency and recording four tracks at once.

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for four months.

What I like most is the sound quality. I have even just to get the roundness in the bass and treble clarity in (knowing that I use an SM-57, what I would get a Rode or Neuman!)

Before I used an M-Audio Audiophile USB. Suffice to say right away that it has nothing to do (it's not the same budget either).
The motu is far above in sound quality, latency, ...

The Ultralite is a simple to use interface with a quality that I did not expect to have on my demos.
View the reputation "pro" Motu, I was afraid of not knowing properly use the card. But everything is simple. The Cue Mix console pads mitigation ... it's a real treat.

I would do this choice.