2x12 Shiva Closed Back classified ad
New ad alertImages
Reviews
5.0/5(1 reviews)
100 %
Write a user review
Berzin
Published on 02/19/07 at 05:12 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
This enclosure is Designed to accompany the head Shiva. Unlike what is said in the title, it is open and not closed. It is two Celestion V30 team for a impdance announcement of eight ohms, although mine is in sixteen. Its weight is about twenty-five kilograms. It is a mono speaker. It is extremely well finished, which is normal, considering the price. I find trs class. Although much smaller than its cousins in Bogner, its height is relatively large for a 2x12. A small regret: it has a unique grip on the top. Latrales the grips are comfortable and the grip up a little when ESG wants to ask a head or combo above. The balance is prcaire and must be put shims to stabilize the whole....…
Read more
This enclosure is Designed to accompany the head Shiva. Unlike what is said in the title, it is open and not closed. It is two Celestion V30 team for a impdance announcement of eight ohms, although mine is in sixteen. Its weight is about twenty-five kilograms. It is a mono speaker. It is extremely well finished, which is normal, considering the price. I find trs class. Although much smaller than its cousins in Bogner, its height is relatively large for a 2x12. A small regret: it has a unique grip on the top. Latrales the grips are comfortable and the grip up a little when ESG wants to ask a head or combo above. The balance is prcaire and must be put shims to stabilize the whole. It's bad when even pens!
Before possder the baffle, I had an E112 and a Peavey 1922 Marshall. I will not give you the insult to compare them to the Bogner. His level, I find that the records are well balance, even if the mdiums prdominent. Submitted are low and round. The only small acute Reserved For I find a bit garish. But I also think that HP need to be rods and the sound should soften with time. Level projection is Drout. When I test for the first time I played trs prs baffle for possible rgler the amp on. later, I drop a few meters and I took an earful. The projection is excellent. Above, a parat low, but four meters in front of you your deaf!
That's my opinion, an excellent speaker, although I have not had the opportunity to compare it with other high-end speakers (Mesa, Soldano, CAA, etc.).. I like its simplicity it sound quite traditional (open baffle), its projection and Aesthetics lgante trs. I regret the design of the grip. However, we do not have the ide Mtera it's a bit expensive for some boards and two HP. But in fact, competition poster rates in the same waters, so ...
Edit: After a few time, hps are now part of the small rods and garish appearance does feel more. The sound is beautiful. I could compare it with a Marshall 1960 4x12 standard and well spread, the silent Bogner comparable or better and Marshall had less bass!
Before possder the baffle, I had an E112 and a Peavey 1922 Marshall. I will not give you the insult to compare them to the Bogner. His level, I find that the records are well balance, even if the mdiums prdominent. Submitted are low and round. The only small acute Reserved For I find a bit garish. But I also think that HP need to be rods and the sound should soften with time. Level projection is Drout. When I test for the first time I played trs prs baffle for possible rgler the amp on. later, I drop a few meters and I took an earful. The projection is excellent. Above, a parat low, but four meters in front of you your deaf!
That's my opinion, an excellent speaker, although I have not had the opportunity to compare it with other high-end speakers (Mesa, Soldano, CAA, etc.).. I like its simplicity it sound quite traditional (open baffle), its projection and Aesthetics lgante trs. I regret the design of the grip. However, we do not have the ide Mtera it's a bit expensive for some boards and two HP. But in fact, competition poster rates in the same waters, so ...
Edit: After a few time, hps are now part of the small rods and garish appearance does feel more. The sound is beautiful. I could compare it with a Marshall 1960 4x12 standard and well spread, the silent Bogner comparable or better and Marshall had less bass!
See less
21
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Bogner
- Model: 2x12 Shiva Closed Back
- Category: 2x12 Guitar Cabinets
- Added in our database on: 03/13/2004
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Other categories in Guitar Cabinets
Other names: 2x12 shiva closed back, 2x12shivaclosedback, 2x 12 shiva closed back, 2 x12 shiva closed back, 2 x12 shivaclosedback, 2x12 shivaclosedback, 2x12shiva closed back